As so many papers were either not sent ,lost or whatever why is this result allowed to stand and not null and void ???
While I disagree with the result, I find it incredable that 50,000 plus people didn't vote or were unable, even more so that it was a postal vote anyway in view of the fact it was to do with the post and is open to "lost " papers . Surely it would have been better as a internet or telephone vote ?
:mfo :mfo :mfo
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Ballot Papers
-
packmule
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 132
- Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 08:49
- Gender: Male
- Location: E mids
-
eian687
- Posts: 743
- Joined: 27 May 2007, 09:43
- Location: south wales
Re: Ballot Papers
I bet Royal Mail would have gone to court had it gone against them 
-
wakkono
- Posts: 392
- Joined: 21 May 2007, 17:14
- Location: south wales valleys
Re: Ballot Papers
if someone had the time and money and the will im sure they could go to court and get a juditial review against the ballot result. i work in a unit of 45 and 7 didnt get a ballot paper so i imagine over the country it would soon amount to thousands!
rural driver south wales valleys
-
RelocatedRick
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 64
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 01:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Ballot Papers
Do they need time & money? What about union legal services? (Is it still Simpson Millar?)!
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
Re: Ballot Papers
The union would'nt contest the result after all they were advocating a YES vote
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Ballot Papers
Absolutely.Stormproof wrote:The union would'nt contest the result after all they were advocating a YES vote
The only winners were/are Royal Mail and the CWU. The workforce lost out again, as usual.
-
POSTMAN
- SITE ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 32784
- Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Ballot Papers
Even the 'quiet' ones at my place thinks it's dodgy,and if they pipe up,you know summins wrong.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
-
feduppostie
- Posts: 947
- Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 19:46
Re: Ballot Papers
I would like to know why there was nothing on the envelope that contained the DVD that also read 'ballot paper inside'
It took me 3 goes to find mine as it had stuck to the back of the leaflet inside
it was only the return envelope inside that made me look again
i know alot of peeps just chucked the envelope away without opening it as they did not realise it contained a ballot paper
It took me 3 goes to find mine as it had stuck to the back of the leaflet inside
it was only the return envelope inside that made me look again
i know alot of peeps just chucked the envelope away without opening it as they did not realise it contained a ballot paper
-
2leftfeet
- Posts: 24
- Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 20:43
Re: Ballot Papers
Some at my place did not recieve anything!
-
RelocatedRick
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 64
- Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 01:43
- Gender: Male
Re: Ballot Papers
Here is the link to the court case brought by two members who didn't receive ballot papers in 2000:
http://www.certoffice.org/Decisions/pdf ... r_2000.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.certoffice.org/Decisions/pdf ... D.25-26.00" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Interesting bits:
2.7 The complainants also cited Conference Motion 11 from the same paper,which noted ‘with dismay’ the apparent lack of response and absence of concern from both the General Secretary’s Department and the Unity Security Balloting in respect of ballot papers found unopened in Yorks(sic) “At Wolverhampton Mail Centre on the ‘Way Forward Agreement’.”The motion was carried.
3.15 Turning to Conference Motions E11 and E53, Mr Dodd explained that in the case of E11,the fault lay at the door of Royal Mail and the mailing house concerned,for which the union could take no responsibility. The Composite Motion 53 which noted with concern the‘deterioration of information from the records department’ could be attributed to a lobby within the union who had been used to its own record system before its members, who had previously belonged to the National Communication Union (NCU) had merged to form the Communication Workers Union. Mr Dodd said that there was nothing in this Conference debate about accuracy and therefore the motion was not at all representative of mainstream opinion.
The judge rejected the members complaints, but in respect of conference motion 11 (unopened papers) did this ever get properly investigated? And in respect of members not receiving ballot papers, deja vu anyone?
http://www.certoffice.org/Decisions/pdf ... r_2000.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.certoffice.org/Decisions/pdf ... D.25-26.00" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Interesting bits:
2.7 The complainants also cited Conference Motion 11 from the same paper,which noted ‘with dismay’ the apparent lack of response and absence of concern from both the General Secretary’s Department and the Unity Security Balloting in respect of ballot papers found unopened in Yorks(sic) “At Wolverhampton Mail Centre on the ‘Way Forward Agreement’.”The motion was carried.
3.15 Turning to Conference Motions E11 and E53, Mr Dodd explained that in the case of E11,the fault lay at the door of Royal Mail and the mailing house concerned,for which the union could take no responsibility. The Composite Motion 53 which noted with concern the‘deterioration of information from the records department’ could be attributed to a lobby within the union who had been used to its own record system before its members, who had previously belonged to the National Communication Union (NCU) had merged to form the Communication Workers Union. Mr Dodd said that there was nothing in this Conference debate about accuracy and therefore the motion was not at all representative of mainstream opinion.
The judge rejected the members complaints, but in respect of conference motion 11 (unopened papers) did this ever get properly investigated? And in respect of members not receiving ballot papers, deja vu anyone?
-
ziko
- Posts: 225
- Joined: 01 Dec 2009, 20:26
- Gender: Male
Re: Ballot Papers
I find it funny that the cwu and royal mail asked its members and workforce how they felt by asking them to vote yes? Guys, do you really think our votes were even counted............. Ballots have been fixed since people in power entertained their slaves sorry, their commoners sorry, workers. Again may i point out that my last vote was not counted as a manager had hid, sorry 'delayed' all of our offices ballot papers. Didnt the bbc get in trouble for fixing votes? Did not also Itv get in trouble for fixing live telephone votes.
For the record i agree with anyone that suggests that agreements should be on a national level and 'not' at a divided local level.
Are we the not all as one - Divided we fall ?
For the record i agree with anyone that suggests that agreements should be on a national level and 'not' at a divided local level.
Are we the not all as one - Divided we fall ?