ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Ballot Papers

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
packmule
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 132
Joined: 04 Jun 2009, 08:49
Gender: Male
Location: E mids

Ballot Papers

Post by packmule »

As so many papers were either not sent ,lost or whatever why is this result allowed to stand and not null and void ???

While I disagree with the result, I find it incredable that 50,000 plus people didn't vote or were unable, even more so that it was a postal vote anyway in view of the fact it was to do with the post and is open to "lost " papers . Surely it would have been better as a internet or telephone vote ?


:mfo :mfo :mfo
eian687
Posts: 743
Joined: 27 May 2007, 09:43
Location: south wales

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by eian687 »

I bet Royal Mail would have gone to court had it gone against them :d'oh!
wakkono
Posts: 392
Joined: 21 May 2007, 17:14
Location: south wales valleys

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by wakkono »

if someone had the time and money and the will im sure they could go to court and get a juditial review against the ballot result. i work in a unit of 45 and 7 didnt get a ballot paper so i imagine over the country it would soon amount to thousands!
rural driver south wales valleys
RelocatedRick
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 64
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 01:43
Gender: Male

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by RelocatedRick »

Do they need time & money? What about union legal services? (Is it still Simpson Millar?)!
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by Stormproof »

The union would'nt contest the result after all they were advocating a YES vote
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by DirtyHarry »

Stormproof wrote:The union would'nt contest the result after all they were advocating a YES vote
Absolutely.
The only winners were/are Royal Mail and the CWU. The workforce lost out again, as usual. :roll:
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32784
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by POSTMAN »

Even the 'quiet' ones at my place thinks it's dodgy,and if they pipe up,you know summins wrong.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
feduppostie
Posts: 947
Joined: 24 Jun 2007, 19:46

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by feduppostie »

I would like to know why there was nothing on the envelope that contained the DVD that also read 'ballot paper inside'

It took me 3 goes to find mine as it had stuck to the back of the leaflet inside

it was only the return envelope inside that made me look again

i know alot of peeps just chucked the envelope away without opening it as they did not realise it contained a ballot paper
2leftfeet
Posts: 24
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 20:43

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by 2leftfeet »

Some at my place did not recieve anything!
RelocatedRick
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 64
Joined: 07 Feb 2010, 01:43
Gender: Male

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by RelocatedRick »

Here is the link to the court case brought by two members who didn't receive ballot papers in 2000:

http://www.certoffice.org/Decisions/pdf ... r_2000.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.certoffice.org/Decisions/pdf ... D.25-26.00" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Interesting bits:

2.7 The complainants also cited Conference Motion 11 from the same paper,which noted ‘with dismay’ the apparent lack of response and absence of concern from both the General Secretary’s Department and the Unity Security Balloting in respect of ballot papers found unopened in Yorks(sic) “At Wolverhampton Mail Centre on the ‘Way Forward Agreement’.”The motion was carried.

3.15 Turning to Conference Motions E11 and E53, Mr Dodd explained that in the case of E11,the fault lay at the door of Royal Mail and the mailing house concerned,for which the union could take no responsibility. The Composite Motion 53 which noted with concern the‘deterioration of information from the records department’ could be attributed to a lobby within the union who had been used to its own record system before its members, who had previously belonged to the National Communication Union (NCU) had merged to form the Communication Workers Union. Mr Dodd said that there was nothing in this Conference debate about accuracy and therefore the motion was not at all representative of mainstream opinion.

The judge rejected the members complaints, but in respect of conference motion 11 (unopened papers) did this ever get properly investigated? And in respect of members not receiving ballot papers, deja vu anyone?
ziko
Posts: 225
Joined: 01 Dec 2009, 20:26
Gender: Male

Re: Ballot Papers

Post by ziko »

I find it funny that the cwu and royal mail asked its members and workforce how they felt by asking them to vote yes? Guys, do you really think our votes were even counted............. Ballots have been fixed since people in power entertained their slaves sorry, their commoners sorry, workers. Again may i point out that my last vote was not counted as a manager had hid, sorry 'delayed' all of our offices ballot papers. Didnt the bbc get in trouble for fixing votes? Did not also Itv get in trouble for fixing live telephone votes.
For the record i agree with anyone that suggests that agreements should be on a national level and 'not' at a divided local level.
Are we the not all as one - Divided we fall ?