ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Minimum standards ?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
beckydave
Posts: 12
Joined: 23 Dec 2007, 20:58

Minimum standards ?

Post by beckydave »

In our office we have been told that we cannot cut off or book over unless we have more than 1300 items of mail. Is this an agreed figure does anyone know ? We have town walks which are fine but some of the rurals cover 55 miles and take a lot longer !
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by DGP1 »

Ask dingo, he'll probably just blame your office though :roll:
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
youwot!!!!!
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 582
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 14:45
Gender: Male
Location: oop north

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by youwot!!!!! »

they are talking bollocks.
this is for the gullible mugs who don't have a set of balls and believe everything managers tell them.

THEY CANNOT MAKE YOU WORK OVER YOUR CONTRACTED HOURS-HOW MANY TIME DOES THIS HAVE TO BE SAID FOR GODS SAKE.
who the hell invests £2 billion into a servic and makes it worse?????????????
you really couldn't make it up!!!!!!!!!!!
AnotherLimey
Posts: 751
Joined: 08 Aug 2009, 18:45
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by AnotherLimey »

DGP1 wrote:Ask dingo, he'll probably just blame your office though :roll:
Yes Dingo is strong, you on the otherhand are weak, weak i tell you!!
beckydave
Posts: 12
Joined: 23 Dec 2007, 20:58

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by beckydave »

Yes I know in theory that they can`t make you work over ,but it seems that there are some sort of minimum standards that have been agreed !
GHOSTman
Posts: 283
Joined: 16 Dec 2009, 08:48
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by GHOSTman »

We've had this discusion in our office loads of times. Our local rep and area rep have always stated there is no agreed prep rate and no agreed figure for amount of items required to cut off. Our manager once said people should only be struggling if they have over 1600 items. which for my duty structure would give an overall prep rate of 26.6 items a minute...thats including walking round for boxing off, mis-sorts, redirections, ect. so would need to be throwing in the items at about 40 items a minute to achieve an overall rate of 26.6. Madness.
ashadd
Posts: 605
Joined: 03 Oct 2008, 20:20
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by ashadd »

beckydave wrote:In our office we have been told that we cannot cut off or book over unless we have more than 1300 items of mail. Is this an agreed figure does anyone know ? We have town walks which are fine but some of the rurals cover 55 miles and take a lot longer !

WHAT!!!!!!!! So who is going to count them..???????? :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: Its got to be a wind up.. :Very Happy
I married my wife for her looks, but not the one she gave me when i said i was going to be a postman.
GHOSTman
Posts: 283
Joined: 16 Dec 2009, 08:48
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by GHOSTman »

ashadd wrote:
beckydave wrote:In our office we have been told that we cannot cut off or book over unless we have more than 1300 items of mail. Is this an agreed figure does anyone know ? We have town walks which are fine but some of the rurals cover 55 miles and take a lot longer !

WHAT!!!!!!!! So who is going to count them..???????? :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: Its got to be a wind up.. :Very Happy
Afraid to tell you that in some offices, mine included, managers are counting peoples mail before they allow them to cut off. then they put the figures in to their computer to say whether your prep rate is acceptable...(even though there is no agreed rate) :arrrghhh Some days the managers are going round like headless chickens counting mail.
beckydave
Posts: 12
Joined: 23 Dec 2007, 20:58

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by beckydave »

What does not make sense is the fact that they seem to take no account of the fact that some rurals in our office take an hour and a half longer than some town walks. And the town walks don`t take the overweights or tracked ! Not having a go at town walks because I cover both in our office !
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by fishtank »

beckydave wrote:What does not make sense is the fact that they seem to take no account of the fact that some rurals in our office take an hour and a half longer than some town walks. And the town walks don`t take the overweights or tracked ! Not having a go at town walks because I cover both in our office !
When they count your mail they are measuring indoor not outdoor workload.
What they want to be able to say is the reason you are cutting off is that you have not reached acceptable prep rate standards and therefore have taken too long to prep your duty.
It is all typical Royal Mail management bullsh*t but you better get used to it.
When the as yet unseen/agreed/supposed to be achievable standards are published managers will really go to town.
And you know what.....you voted for it so live with it. :cuppa
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by drb »

OK,get your rep to ask them this :

Where are the workshops and date in the next 4 weeks?

Where is the word "budget" in the national agreement?

ALL previous delivery spec withdrawn by Royal mail as they want them to be fair

What is the accurate traffic figure?

Can we indentify "Stress" and the cause of it?

All revision activity to involve the CWU at the earliest time

Any previous activity involving exec action has cost the business MORE

All executive action to be reported by your divisional rep.Mr Higson does not want managers with their own policies.
sub rep
Posts: 2
Joined: 27 Apr 2010, 20:04
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards

Post by sub rep »

beckydave wrote:In our office we have been told that we cannot cut off or book over unless we have more than 1300 items of mail. Is this an agreed figure does anyone know ? We have town walks which are fine but some of the rurals cover 55 miles and take a lot longer !
wot a load of crap you have got your set hours if i have got 3 letters and go past my time they go back you dont go asda and get your shopping for free so you dont work for free thats wot i tell my members so your dom better get there working shoes on
beckydave
Posts: 12
Joined: 23 Dec 2007, 20:58

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by beckydave »

[quote="fishtank
When the as yet unseen/agreed/supposed to be achievable standards are published managers will really go to town.
And you know what.....you voted for it so live with it. :cuppa[/quote]
This is the thing, what are they ? [voted no by the way !]
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by fishtank »

beckydave wrote: This is the thing, what are they ? [voted no by the way !]
Who knows?....and to be honest it doesn't matter that much what they are.
It's how they will be used that will cause the real damage. :hmmmm
And the "you voted for it" was aimed at the membership in general not you in particular. :sad:
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Minimum standards ?

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

beckydave wrote:In our office we have been told that we cannot cut off or book over unless we have more than 1300 items of mail. Is this an agreed figure does anyone know ? We have town walks which are fine but some of the rurals cover 55 miles and take a lot longer !
I would frankly be amazed if its agreed as it would take no account of weight, average call or attendance rate, the duties average mail profile. Its a DOM trying it on report it or raise a grievance.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.