ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Union Leadership Poll

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.

What would you do if the CWUs leadership changed

I have left and WOULD rejoin
3
5%
I have left and would NOT rejoin
2
3%
I Have left and would not make a decision until replacements were named
6
10%
I am still in the Union and am not leaving for any reason
28
46%
I am still undecided whether to leave or not and in this situation I WOULD stay
17
28%
I am still undecided whether to leave or not and this would NOT affect my decision.
5
8%
 
Total votes: 61

TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72719
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Union Leadership Poll

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

stokes11eg wrote:P.S time for another poll, along the lines of if Big B and Big D stepped down would folks be liklier to stay in the Union, and would those who left rejoin.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
pinstripe
Posts: 2474
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by pinstripe »

IMO, it is not just the leadership that is responsible for this agreement. The PEC accepted it, branches recommended it, CWU officials promoted it, 40,000 members voted for it and over 50,000 members didn't even vote.
For me, changing the top 2 in the union would have no effect. Over 90,000 of our colleagues either accepted or didn't feel strongly enough to vote against it. It was the apathy of the majority (of the membership) that got this agreement accepted, not just poor leadership.
That is why it is such a let down. Give it 3 years and when RM's next offer of £1.50 and a packet of crisps to sell our children into slavery is accepted, we will see just how low we have fallen.
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by stokes11eg »

:sad: Yes, but it is not only this agreement that the Union have performed badly in. --For nearly ten years now, since B.B
took over the reins the vast majority of agreements have been brough nothing but more job cuts, real cuts in wages, and the most abysmal set of working conditions---shame on them.
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by andy2007 »

Which is precicely why we need change. We get to vote on who holds the top positions, including the PEC. What we need however, is people to stand against those who've let us down, so we can replace them. I don't believe that the problem is the CWU itself. It's a combination of voter apathy, and loss of touch at the top. I have a great deal of respect for my local, and area Reps. They've done a great job despite the situations we've found ourselves in, over the years. We've turned this Union around before, we can do it again! That is. If we want it enough. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
youwot!!!!!
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 582
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 14:45
Gender: Male
Location: oop north

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by youwot!!!!! »

so if you feel that strongly about this will we see you standing for election at the next oppertunity or will you do like most of the whining gits(me included)and keep your head down because they want a quiet life and not the hassles that you would get if you stood and were elected as a rep.
who the hell invests £2 billion into a servic and makes it worse?????????????
you really couldn't make it up!!!!!!!!!!!
pinstripe
Posts: 2474
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by pinstripe »

youwot!!!!! wrote:so if you feel that strongly about this will we see you standing for election at the next oppertunity or will you do like most of the whining gits(me included)and keep your head down because they want a quiet life and not the hassles that you would get if you stood and were elected as a rep.
I don't know if this question is directed at me, but if it is,no, I will not be standing for unit rep. My rep, who is one of the best in this union, deserves my support. I'm sure if you read my post you'll see what my issues are.
"it is not just the leadership that is responsible for this agreement. The PEC accepted it, branches recommended it, CWU officials promoted it, 40,000 members voted for it and over 50,000 members didn't even vote.
For me, changing the top 2 in the union would have no effect. Over 90,000 of our colleagues either accepted or didn't feel strongly enough to vote against it. It was the apathy of the majority (of the membership) that got this agreement accepted, not just poor leadership."
That is the problem.
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by stokes11eg »

:sad: Then you should ask yourself WHY such a large number of members are too apathetic to vote--it's because they havew no faith in the Union any more--
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: Union Leadership Poll

Post by andy2007 »

youwot!!!!! wrote:so if you feel that strongly about this will we see you standing for election at the next oppertunity or will you do like most of the whining gits(me included)and keep your head down because they want a quiet life and not the hassles that you would get if you stood and were elected as a rep.
That depends on what level of the Union you're talking about. I have no intention of going for any of the "top jobs", because I haven't got the neccesary experience at local level, to do a good job. There's no point in replacing formerly good Reps, who've lost touch. With inexperienced replacements, who aren't likley to be able to do a better job. But if you're talking about at local level. Then yes. I will be going for a position.

What we need. Is for experienced local, area, etc.. Reps, to go for the "top jobs". So we've an alternative to vote for, when the time comes. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!