Don't want to seem thick here, but a little clarity is required here please.
On the Ballot papers, I have a second option "Do you accept the revised MTSF agreement"
how does this affect those currently receiving MTSF allowances and what are the implication of this agreement ?
Thanks
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
The revised MTSF agreement
-
NWpostie
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9
The revised MTSF agreement
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
-
Dogs of War
- Posts: 474
- Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 21:00
- Gender: Female
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
NO vote all round.
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
Yep, I'm with youDogs of War wrote:NO vote all round.
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
NWpostie
- Posts: 3620
- Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
- Gender: Male
- Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
I understand your sentiments, a bit more detail would help
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
-
belle smith
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
- Gender: Male
- Location: scotland
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
Hmmm i voted yes on that, in case the first vote came back as a yes, haven't read the details of it but i thought MTSF had been improved.DGP1 wrote:Yep, I'm with youDogs of War wrote:NO vote all round.
-
mailsort6
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 11 Aug 2007, 13:22
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
Most posties are voting yes when it comes for the new terms for the MTSF. this is a good deal where redundancies are concerned and travelling allowances will increase under these terms if posties have to relocate to another office. Posties must vote yes for this part of the deal, even if the other part is rubbish.NWpostie wrote:I understand your sentiments, a bit more detail would help
-
headscrewedon
- Posts: 290
- Joined: 30 Sep 2009, 20:40
- Gender: Female
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
But the improved MtSF agreement is an integral part of the 2010 & Beyond agreement. So it will not come into being if there's a No vote on the 2010 & Beyond deal, even if the MtSF2 ballot has an overwhelming Yesmailsort6 wrote:Posties must vote yes for this part of the deal, even if the other part is rubbish.
Last edited by headscrewedon on 17 Apr 2010, 19:41, edited 1 time in total.
-
postie222
- Posts: 177
- Joined: 25 Mar 2010, 09:39
- Gender: Male
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
i think some of the improvements in the Mtfs are subject to the whole deal been voted in.
-
headscrewedon
- Posts: 290
- Joined: 30 Sep 2009, 20:40
- Gender: Female
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
Wrong, postie222. ALL of the improvements in the Mtfs are subject to the whole deal been voted in
-
belle smith
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
- Gender: Male
- Location: scotland
Re: The revised MTSF agreement
Yep thats right. but the 2nd vote will be relavent if theres a yes in the first.headscrewedon wrote:Wrong, postie222. ALL of the improvements in the Mtfs are subject to the whole deal been voted in