ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

The revised MTSF agreement

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
NWpostie
Posts: 3620
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

The revised MTSF agreement

Post by NWpostie »

Don't want to seem thick here, but a little clarity is required here please.

On the Ballot papers, I have a second option "Do you accept the revised MTSF agreement"

how does this affect those currently receiving MTSF allowances and what are the implication of this agreement ?

Thanks
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
Dogs of War
Posts: 474
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 21:00
Gender: Female

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by Dogs of War »

NO vote all round.
DGP1
Posts: 15551
Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
Gender: Male
Location: Terminus

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by DGP1 »

Dogs of War wrote:NO vote all round.
Yep, I'm with you :Very Happy
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
NWpostie
Posts: 3620
Joined: 04 Aug 2007, 17:32
Gender: Male
Location: Sector 001 Borg Collective, 6 o f 9

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by NWpostie »

I understand your sentiments, a bit more detail would help
Six of Nine loves Seven of Nine, together in Electric Dreams.
belle smith
Posts: 1557
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
Gender: Male
Location: scotland

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by belle smith »

DGP1 wrote:
Dogs of War wrote:NO vote all round.
Yep, I'm with you :Very Happy
Hmmm i voted yes on that, in case the first vote came back as a yes, haven't read the details of it but i thought MTSF had been improved.
mailsort6
Posts: 356
Joined: 11 Aug 2007, 13:22

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by mailsort6 »

NWpostie wrote:I understand your sentiments, a bit more detail would help
Most posties are voting yes when it comes for the new terms for the MTSF. this is a good deal where redundancies are concerned and travelling allowances will increase under these terms if posties have to relocate to another office. Posties must vote yes for this part of the deal, even if the other part is rubbish.
headscrewedon
Posts: 290
Joined: 30 Sep 2009, 20:40
Gender: Female

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by headscrewedon »

mailsort6 wrote:Posties must vote yes for this part of the deal, even if the other part is rubbish.
But the improved MtSF agreement is an integral part of the 2010 & Beyond agreement. So it will not come into being if there's a No vote on the 2010 & Beyond deal, even if the MtSF2 ballot has an overwhelming Yes :roll: :crazy:
Last edited by headscrewedon on 17 Apr 2010, 19:41, edited 1 time in total.
postie222
Posts: 177
Joined: 25 Mar 2010, 09:39
Gender: Male

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by postie222 »

i think some of the improvements in the Mtfs are subject to the whole deal been voted in.
headscrewedon
Posts: 290
Joined: 30 Sep 2009, 20:40
Gender: Female

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by headscrewedon »

Wrong, postie222. ALL of the improvements in the Mtfs are subject to the whole deal been voted in
belle smith
Posts: 1557
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
Gender: Male
Location: scotland

Re: The revised MTSF agreement

Post by belle smith »

headscrewedon wrote:Wrong, postie222. ALL of the improvements in the Mtfs are subject to the whole deal been voted in
Yep thats right. but the 2nd vote will be relavent if theres a yes in the first.