Dingo and his mates have expressed the view that a high turnout is important for this ballot.
They have refused to answer my question on why non letters members are being balloted on proposed MtSF changes but not being balloted on the proposed 10% performance standard.
Why do they want a high turnout?
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
What are the consequences of a low turnout?
-
MinisterofCucumber
- Posts: 806
- Joined: 15 Dec 2009, 22:18
- Gender: Male
What are the consequences of a low turnout?
"You wanna f**k with me? Okay. You wanna play rough? Okay. Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana
-
chewi
- Posts: 124
- Joined: 27 Sep 2009, 16:19
- Gender: Male
Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?
because the higher the turnout, the greater the validity of the answer. You should be encouraging everybody with a vote to use it regardless of whether it's yes or no
-
Big Daz
- Posts: 5668
- Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
- Gender: Male
Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?
This agreement covers employees in CWU represented grades in Royal Mail Letters Operations, Logistics and Network, Engineers, Fleet Maintenance Services and Royal Mail International.
No mention of POL and PF or GLS
Both parties commit to the deployment of WCM, which will be the subject of consultation at all levels and will be consistent with existing national agreements. The rollout which started in mail centres in January 2009 will complete in mail centres and RDCs by September 2011. In delivery offices WCM is still being developed and will be completed in all delivery offices and network hubs by September 2012.
Again no mention of POL and PF or GLS
Sorry M o C but i think you are wrong, other than MTSF everything is RML only IMHO.
No mention of POL and PF or GLS
Both parties commit to the deployment of WCM, which will be the subject of consultation at all levels and will be consistent with existing national agreements. The rollout which started in mail centres in January 2009 will complete in mail centres and RDCs by September 2011. In delivery offices WCM is still being developed and will be completed in all delivery offices and network hubs by September 2012.
Again no mention of POL and PF or GLS
Sorry M o C but i think you are wrong, other than MTSF everything is RML only IMHO.
-
MinisterofCucumber
- Posts: 806
- Joined: 15 Dec 2009, 22:18
- Gender: Male
Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?
Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?
World Class implies global implementation.
Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
World Class implies global implementation.
Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
"You wanna f**k with me? Okay. You wanna play rough? Okay. Say hello to my little friend!" - Tony Montana
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?
You mean Mr Miyagi - lay it on pretty thickMinisterofCucumber wrote:Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?
World Class implies global implementation.
Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
-
DGP1
- Posts: 15551
- Joined: 07 Jun 2007, 20:39
- Gender: Male
- Location: Terminus
Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?
Wax on - wax offdvbuk55 wrote:You mean Mr Miyagi - lay it on pretty thickMinisterofCucumber wrote:Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?
World Class implies global implementation.
Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?
I'm preparing myself for the zombie invasion, rule number 1 - Cardio
-
dvbuk55
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 16650
- Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
- Gender: Male
Re: What are the consequences of a low turnout?
Thanks for that DGP - but it wasn't wax I was thinking thats been laid on pretty thick with this agreementDGP1 wrote:Wax on - wax offdvbuk55 wrote:You mean Mr Miyagi - lay it on pretty thickMinisterofCucumber wrote:Why is it called World Class performance in the proposed agreement and not just World Class Mail?
World Class implies global implementation.
Has anyone got the email address of the Japanese dude, maybe he knows?