ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
postghost
Posts: 433
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 21:19

If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by postghost »

Taken from "A summary of the agreement"


"Exsisiting full time employees will retain full time jobs - similarly existing part time employees are entitled to retain their existing contractual hours if they wish"

if they wish.................

if they wish...........................

if they wish.................................

WHAT IF WE DON'T F*****G "WISH"??
DO PART TIMERS HAVE ANOTHER OPTION CWU???
OF COURSE WE DO - WE CAN JACK IT IN EH?

THE CWU HQ ARE AN UTTER DISGRACE!!!
THEY ARE PORTRAYING THAT THEY ARE DOING US PART-TIMERS A TURN BY SAYING WE DON'T HAVE TO CHANGE HOURS IF WE "WISH"

WHAT IF WE WANT A FULL-TIME JOB YOU CLOWNS??
CWU HAVE NOT ONCE MENTIONED WIH A VIEW TO "GOING FORWARD" THAT FULL TIME POSITIONS WILL BECOME AVAILABLE.
THEY F*****G WELL SHOULD GIVEN ALL THE SINGING AND DANCING THEY HAVE MADE ABOUT DOOR TO DOORS "SECURING THE FUTURE OF THE COMPANY" AND THE FACT WE WILL BE "GIVEN ADDITIONAL TIME" TO PREP THE DOOR TO DOOR ITEMS................... THE CWU EXPECT ALL PART TIME STAFF TO WORK BEYOND THEIR CONTRACTED HOURS WITHOUT ANY COMMITMENT ON THE CWU'S PART TO ESTABLISH A MORE APPLICABLE CONTRACT TO THEIR PART TIME MEMBERS NEEDS.....................NOT ONCE HAS IT BEEN MENTIONED IN ANY CAPACITY SINCE THIS S***E WAS FIRST PROPSED ON PAPER.
:arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
:evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad :evil/mad


Yes I know....caps lock. Sorry mods. Was neccessary :whistle
proper postie
Posts: 328
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 18:26
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by proper postie »

But FT means they will have to give you the full money and not pro rata........
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32784
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by POSTMAN »

"Exsisiting full time employees will retain full time jobs - similarly existing part time employees are entitled to retain their existing contractual hours if they wish"
I'm guessing the above means that PTers do not have to go FT if they don't want to,please be aware that some take a PT job because it suits them.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by Big Daz »

Ive been 30 hours since September 2007 and habve no real desire to go back FT, although if the magic 35 hour week and 400 basic come along I may change my mind. :chuckle
postghost
Posts: 433
Joined: 05 Oct 2007, 21:19

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by postghost »

POSTMAN wrote:
"Exsisiting full time employees will retain full time jobs - similarly existing part time employees are entitled to retain their existing contractual hours if they wish"
I'm guessing the above means that PTers do not have to go FT if they don't want to,please be aware that some take a PT job because it suits them.
Th point is though that they have worded it as if there are other options available.
Pat Ostman
Posts: 2797
Joined: 17 Sep 2008, 21:53
Gender: Male
Location: In the Line Managers office being screwed over.

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by Pat Ostman »

POSTMAN wrote:
"Exsisiting full time employees will retain full time jobs - similarly existing part time employees are entitled to retain their existing contractual hours if they wish"
I'm guessing the above means that PTers do not have to go FT if they don't want to,please be aware that some take a PT job because it suits them.
Aye, and Dave Ward said the union's primary goal is to save FULL TIME jobs. So does that mean part timers do not get the unions attention?
Run, rabbit run. Dig that hole, forget the sun.
And when at last the work is done. Don't sit down, it's time to dig another one
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32784
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by POSTMAN »

postghost wrote:
POSTMAN wrote:
"Exsisiting full time employees will retain full time jobs - similarly existing part time employees are entitled to retain their existing contractual hours if they wish"
I'm guessing the above means that PTers do not have to go FT if they don't want to,please be aware that some take a PT job because it suits them.
Th point is though that they have worded it as if there are other options available.
Word on here is that with the new revision tools there could be some PTers made up,but you're right possibly that there has been no 'official' comms on it except perhaps the odd branch or div.
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
el_cartero
Posts: 838
Joined: 27 Oct 2009, 17:43
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by el_cartero »

we are expected to work below the poverty line

yes i could get ANOTHER part timer job but in reality im going to make myself ill be overworking

im physically exhausted after my walk no lies.

i cant even bare to go out the door again most nights.

the cwu has protected full time jobs and conditions at the cost of part timers payments + conditions becoming UNBEARABLE

I really now am forced to find another job with more money .

And where is the incentive for full timers to go part time with this on the table.

PLEASE STOP SUMEBODY STOP THIS CRUEL AND DISGUSTING PLOY
one day part timers will have the same right as full timers
Roy Mayall
Posts: 236
Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 16:46
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by Roy Mayall »

proper postie wrote:But FT means they will have to give you the full money and not pro rata........
No pro-rata means that even if a part-timer works full time hours, he still only gets part-time pay for his d2d. This is now effectively a 2-tier workforce. What gets me is that either the union didn't realise the implications of this - in which case they are forgiven and they have to go back to the negotiating table to sort it out - or they did, and they have made a deliberate calculation to split the workforce, choosing to secure full-time jobs at the expense of part-timers' status.
proper postie
Posts: 328
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 18:26
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by proper postie »

el_cartero wrote:we are expected to work below the poverty line

yes i could get ANOTHER part timer job but in reality im going to make myself ill be overworking

im physically exhausted after my walk no lies.

i cant even bare to go out the door again most nights.

the cwu has protected full time jobs and conditions at the cost of part timers payments + conditions becoming UNBEARABLE

I really now am forced to find another job with more money .

And where is the incentive for full timers to go part time with this on the table.

PLEASE STOP SUMEBODY STOP THIS CRUEL AND DISGUSTING PLOY
Join the union and vote then you muppet.

Roy,I was being sarcastic.
yakuza
Posts: 16
Joined: 30 Mar 2010, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by yakuza »

yes that was is gonna happen if yes vote go through

CWU and RM management screw PART TIMERS over with D2D and put unsustainable workload and disgracefully discriminatory condition (pro rata payment for same amount of D2D as full timers)
they probably will expect to deliver all D2D within current contractual hours (25 in my case) and they will find expaination that all that super duper automatic machinery saving so much time that we should be still manage to do far more within 25hrs - this is attitiude of my DOM at least

appreciate if more PT will share their views

Once again

union wants to save full time jobs at our PART TIMERS expense making job simply unbearable and cousing ill health for many PT i suppose
Speedydelivery
Posts: 32
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 00:00
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by Speedydelivery »

they have made a deliberate calculation to split the workforce, choosing to secure full-time jobs at the expense of part-timers' status.

I think thats exactly what the CWU have done. The CWU have said themselves that they don't want the workforce replaced with part time workers and this agreement protects fulltime jobs. The D2D agreement is so unfair and If the agreement goes through then I will not allow myself to go over my time due to door to doors, they will sit in the depo if I can't finish on my time.
el_cartero
Posts: 838
Joined: 27 Oct 2009, 17:43
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by el_cartero »

This is exzactly why part timers need there own union .

part time postmen have taken the hit for everyone.

even if ur part time elsewhere uf u dont touch d2d youve gained.

But ive made a decision - if this agreement gets through i will be working to my time and i wont be doing any favours . because im goign to have to get another job on the side
one day part timers will have the same right as full timers
postiel
Posts: 56
Joined: 05 May 2007, 09:34
Location: south

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by postiel »

el cartero wrote
yes i could get ANOTHER part timer job but in reality im going to make myself ill be overworking

im physically exhausted after my walk no lies.

i cant even bare to go out the door again most nights. then ;


But ive made a decision - if this agreement gets through i will be working to my time and i wont be doing any favours . because im goign to have to get another job on the side
:arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
:crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
delboy
Posts: 367
Joined: 05 May 2009, 16:12
Gender: Male

Re: If there is one reason for part timers to vote no!

Post by delboy »

To coincide with the introduction of the national agreement unit payments will cease and the 3 items per week cap will be removed. D2D Monies will be turned into a delivery supplement paid 52 weeks a year for all delivery employees (OPG and ORR) pro rata for part time employees.

This is my number one reason to vote NO Just can't believe the cheek of the cwu... :mad
FUMING!