ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Would you?

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
number one
Posts: 1324
Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 21:20
Gender: Male

Would you?

Post by number one »

To all the "yes" voters just a quick question for you. Would you of gone on strike for this deal?
Top
Dogs of War
Posts: 474
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 21:00
Gender: Female

Re: Would you?

Post by Dogs of War »

I am not a yes voter, I would go on strike to get a better deal.
Top
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Would you?

Post by DirtyHarry »

number one wrote:To all the "yes" voters just a quick question for you. Would you of gone on strike for this deal?
Wasting your time, mate. As this is a bank holiday, I suspect those that are inexplicably voting for their own demise, will have packed their buckets and spades, and are probably half-way to laa-laa land as I speak.
Top
number one
Posts: 1324
Joined: 19 Aug 2009, 21:20
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by number one »

I just cant get my head round this deal! ? Just think on this scenario if this happend last Oct/nov when we went on strike

CWU "right we are going on strike for better working conditions"

Postie " ok but what would we settle for"

CWU "well, we would like to earn less money, do more D2Ds for free AND work longer on a saturday"

Postie " but this would mean we are WORSE off than we are now, so why are we going on strike for less money and more work"?

CWU "ermmm I dunnooo"

WOULD WE OF GONE ON STRIKE IF THE ABOVE HAPPEND? I THINK NOT!!!!!!!!
Top
dblad
Posts: 448
Joined: 20 Nov 2009, 18:26
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by dblad »

Happened in 2007, we were called out because RM wanted to make changes to work and conditions, after the strike RM changed our work and conditions and CWU called it a pay dispute and claimed a victory
Top
wf
Posts: 183
Joined: 01 Nov 2009, 13:21
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by wf »

number one wrote:I just cant get my head round this deal! ? Just think on this scenario if this happend last Oct/nov when we went on strike

CWU "right we are going on strike for better working conditions"

Postie " ok but what would we settle for"

CWU "well, we would like to earn less money, do more D2Ds for free AND work longer on a saturday"

Postie " but this would mean we are WORSE off than we are now, so why are we going on strike for less money and more work"?

CWU "ermmm I dunnooo"

WOULD WE OF GONE ON STRIKE IF THE ABOVE HAPPEND? I THINK NOT!!!!!!!!

you should come and have a swift word with the union reps in our office .apparently this is the best deal ever and british airways staff would bight our arms off for it. how sick can i feel.your whole post above just about sums it up.dont forget tho you will be working an hour less every week. as if!! bulliied into working an extra ten more like for nothin.
Top
mailman71
Posts: 500
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03

Re: Would you?

Post by mailman71 »

we went on strike in 1971 for 7 weeks and went back for less.
Top
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by fishtank »

mailman71 wrote:we went on strike in 1971 for 7 weeks and went back for less.

Yes mailman71 and i bet it still smarts today.
Now do we really want another crappy deal that hurts for nearly 40 years? :hmmmm
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Top
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16683
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Would you?

Post by clashcityrocker »

mailman71 wrote:we went on strike in 1971 for 7 weeks and went back for less.
And I doubt if you could get a strike to hold for 7 days now let alone 7 weeks.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Top
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32784
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by POSTMAN »

Bob Gibson said at the London briefing that even the RMT 'wouldn't get a deal like this.' :nervous
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
Top
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by dvbuk55 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
mailman71 wrote:we went on strike in 1971 for 7 weeks and went back for less.
And I doubt if you could get a strike to hold for 7 days now let alone 7 weeks.
Which goes to show how much loyalty the present leadership engenders I'm afraid.
Top
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by dvbuk55 »

POSTMAN wrote:Bob Gibson said at the London briefing that even the RMT 'wouldn't get a deal like this.' :nervous
Do you know postman - that is the one thing he did get right - although he might be running a close call - lets see:

Undefined journey times
Less Money
More and later shifts
Loss of allowances

Oh I don't know maybe an employer would go for it at a pinch :crazy:
Top
clashcityrocker
Posts: 16683
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 13:50
Gender: Male
Location: strummerville

Re: Would you?

Post by clashcityrocker »

dvbuk55 wrote: Which goes to show how much loyalty the present leadership engenders I'm afraid.
More to do with more home-owners with mortgages than any lack of faith in Hayes/Ward I think.
More part-timers as well.
And a massive change in popular thinking. Fewer union members (was it a closed shop in '71?) and less public acceptance of strikes because the media has changed as well.
So nothing to do with loyalty I'm afraid.
The societies of consumption and squandering of material resources are incompatible with the idea of economic growth and a clean planet.
Top
mailman71
Posts: 500
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03

Re: Would you?

Post by mailman71 »

clashcityrocker wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote: Which goes to show how much loyalty the present leadership engenders I'm afraid.
More to do with more home-owners with mortgages than any lack of faith in Hayes/Ward I think.
More part-timers as well.
And a massive change in popular thinking. Fewer union members (was it a closed shop in '71?) and less public acceptance of strikes because the media has changed as well.
So nothing to do with loyalty I'm afraid.
so long ago cant remember if it was a closed shop but few people had mortgages in those days there's no way people could stay out so long nowadays i honestly dont know what will happen when the vote is no.
Top
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Would you?

Post by fishtank »

clashcityrocker wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote: Which goes to show how much loyalty the present leadership engenders I'm afraid.
More to do with more home-owners with mortgages than any lack of faith in Hayes/Ward I think.
More part-timers as well.
And a massive change in popular thinking. Fewer union members (was it a closed shop in '71?) and less public acceptance of strikes because the media has changed as well.
I suspect those reasons may play a part however many put their personal issues aside last year and voted overwhelmingly for strike action. :hmmmm
So nothing to do with loyalty I'm afraid.
Well you could try a re-ballot as this is the only factor that has really changed in the last 6 months.
Good luck. :wave
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Top

Return to “BLUE SHIRTS”