ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
bwfcmaddog
Posts: 94
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 12:12
Gender: Male

Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by bwfcmaddog »

it jooks that i will be loosing money every week as a postman to enable mc,s and indoor people to have a pay rise or am i wrong ??? :hmmmm :hmmmm :hmmmm :hmmmm :hmmmm :hmmmm :hmmmm
Postbot
Posts: 31
Joined: 21 Oct 2009, 21:29
Gender: Male
Location: Sheffield

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by Postbot »

Can't argue plenty in delivery will be seeing less in their pay packet in the guise of a rise!!!, however, the mail centre staff do not get the supplement and the bulk of the job losses will come from there also I believe.
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by gb93 »

I am no angel or beyond reproach but comments like that do nothing to help anybody but RM.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
bwfcmaddog
Posts: 94
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 12:12
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by bwfcmaddog »

gb93 wrote:I am no angel or beyond reproach but comments like that do nothing to help anybody but RM.
sorry to upset you and i dont want a conflict but by that remark i suspect you work in doors if so answer me this why should i take a substantial cut in pay to do more work in less hours to enable the cwu to spread thoose saving acrooss the whole of the membership
bwfcmaddog
Posts: 94
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 12:12
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by bwfcmaddog »

gb93 wrote:I am no angel or beyond reproach but comments like that do nothing to help anybody but RM.
and wat royal mail and the cwu have done is to seperate mcs and dos why should mcs have a vote on cutting dos pay
tpost
Posts: 245
Joined: 26 May 2007, 13:33
Gender: Male
Location: Thames house

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by tpost »

RM are using divide and rule tactics, and people are falling for it
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by gb93 »

No i work in deliveries,if you think it is a bad deal use your right and vote no(when you get the chance :Very Happy )

And if you do(if) want a no vote in the ballot across all functions,Your original comments would not help sway MC colleagues to your desired result.

Just my opinion doesnt meen i am right.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
bwfcmaddog
Posts: 94
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 12:12
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by bwfcmaddog »

gb93 wrote:No i work in deliveries,if you think it is a bad deal use your right and vote no(when you get the chance :Very Happy )

And if you do(if) want a no vote in the ballot across all functions,Your original comments would not help sway MC colleagues to your desired result.

Just my opinion doesnt meen i am right.
ok noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo :crazy:
wacko74
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1572
Joined: 04 Apr 2009, 20:35
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by wacko74 »

Just cant understand why the indoor staff get a share of the dr2dr purse when its us on deliveries doing all the hard work,
i wouldnt expect to get a share of their night-shift allowance or the various bonuses that they get i.e. for cleaning the machines.
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by gb93 »

Now here is a contraversial opinion, D2D and the Delivery Supplement is not the be all and end all of the deal.

There is a lot more lurking in there if you take a close look that affects all functions.

Just my opinion.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.
bwfcmaddog
Posts: 94
Joined: 19 Oct 2009, 12:12
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by bwfcmaddog »

gb93 wrote:Now here is a contraversial opinion, D2D and the Delivery Supplement is not the be all and end all of the deal.

There is a lot more lurking in there if you take a close look that affects all functions.

Just my opinion.
no matter how its dressed up they want do staff to vote themselves a PAYCUTwho in there rite mind is going to do this i find it amazing that ward and his side kicks wud insult us with this deal :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
garymgo
Posts: 39
Joined: 03 Oct 2007, 19:50

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by garymgo »

Ive been more than 20 years and its always been the same, delivery is the hardest worked and the worst rewarded.
Godric
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 855
Joined: 17 Oct 2009, 12:08
Gender: Male
Location: The Kingdom of Alba

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by Godric »

Ricky Bruch wrote:
bwfcmaddog wrote: why should i take a substantial cut in pay to do more work in less hours to enable the cwu to spread thoose saving acrooss the whole of the membership
Because this is a UNION and we should be sticking together and helping each other out through the good and bad times.

Unfortunately DO`s have had yet another kicking as spoken by my manager, but then again was he just drumming up conflict :hmmmm
:Applause :Applause


spot Ricky we are in this together
"Vi har haft århundraden av kärlek och tillit till varandra."
tomangoe
Posts: 117
Joined: 10 Apr 2007, 18:47

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by tomangoe »

What I don't understand is why the CWU think its ok to capture our early shift allowance so its not lost and then spread it around all functions.Surely the same principle should apply to all allowances protected under "grandfather rights" eg ex PHG,driving etc. these are also lost when someone leaves the business and these should be "captured" and spread around everyone.Or to take all this to its logical conclusion and pay everyone whos an OPG the same-pro rata of course !
gb93
Posts: 1462
Joined: 29 Oct 2009, 16:25
Gender: Male

Re: Do,s subsidising Mc,s

Post by gb93 »

Fair point about OLD PHG and Driving allowance tomango it puzzles me why these were not included in new delivery supplement.

Especially as ex phg and drivers seem to benefit most from new delivery supplement.

Just my opinion.
This ain't no baseball game, you get only one chance and you blew it.