Email to Postcomm fired off.

[mclovin]

In reply to their failure to see what was coming.

Email I recieved 26 January 2010 regarding later finish times.

Hello

Royal Mail have not informed us of any changes to the 2 / 3pm times.

Postcomm’s remit is to protect the one collection and one delivery per day at a uniform price however the times of collection / delivery are not included in our remit, therefore this remains with Royal Mail.

However, Postcomm would not welcome any change that led to a deterioration in service and will monitor the situation. I will highlight your concerns to Postcomm management

Regards

Michelle Koretz
Associate, Customer Interest Directorate
Postcomm - the Postal Regulator
Hercules House
6 Hercules Road
London
SE1 7DB

Email I just fired off.

Hello again.

Not even 3 months down the line and RM and CWU have an "agreement" which sees delivery times increase to 3pm and 4pm, INCLUDING Saturdays. What exactly is the point of Postcomm if you let RM just do as they please against the wishes of their staff and more importantly, the customers whose mail deliveries you are there to protect. There are already postmen and women up and down the country who cannot complete delivery and either take mail back or have to leave it in, this mail is left for the following day in many cases. How exactly is this a good service?? Its deteriorating fast while Postcomm sit and watch. And with a later finish time of 3pm and 4pm even more posties will be handing back or cutting off. This "agreement" is nothing short of a disgrace. Modernisation?? Its a joke.

CAJ.


Cant wait for the reply.

[POSTMAN]

Nice one,this should be interesting.

[Dogs of War]

Will not make a difference the changes are coming no matter what.

[opgpat]

Good work, however to ensure you get a reply and the attention you deserve you should have asked specific questions eg
What is Postcomm doing to ensure later finishes are not introduced?
Is Postcomm being consulted over the changes to service as outlined in the New Agreement 2010?

let us kow if they do get back to you.

[Night Tonic]

I'd take the name off if I were you, unless you have permission to publish it.

[TrueBlueTerrier]

I'd take the name off if I were you, unless you have permission to publish it.

why. Its publicly available exactly in the format posted


here is a link http://www.psc.gov.uk/postcomm/live/pol ... onse_2.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[POSTMAN]

I'd take the name off if I were you, unless you have permission to publish it.

Nice of you to care about us.

[Pinky 1]

I'd take the name off if I were you, unless you have permission to publish it.

Nice of you to care about us.

I wouldn't get too excited POSTMAN, it's a first ....... and probably a last

[Night Tonic]

I don't and obviously neither do you

[POSTMAN]

I don't and obviously neither do you

I know you don't,but what do you mean about me?