The vote result

jamstercompaq · Post by **jamstercompaq** » 11 Mar 2010, 17:18

If more people voted yes how do we know that the union couldve doctored the results?

uprising95 · Post by **uprising95** » 11 Mar 2010, 17:26

a no vote in my opinion wont do anything.
that agreement is made to sound better than it actually is as well.
just got to page 26 then got bored

Dogs of War · Post by **Dogs of War** » 11 Mar 2010, 17:45

Why do you think it will not make a difference? Voting no.

LDV 350 · Post by **LDV 350** » 11 Mar 2010, 18:00

Dogs of War wrote:Why do you think it will not make a difference? Voting no.

Just my opinion there is no point in voting no when we still have the same CWU leadership and negotiaters in place, if you went on strike the danger is we would be soundly defeated as downhearted posties just cross the line anyway, we must first defeat and remove Hayes and Ward before we can even realistically think of taking on and defeating Royal Mail, the last round of strikes we were ordered back to work when we where on the verge of a magnificent victory, the troops will never vote to strike in strong enough numbers until these 2 are gone

uprising95 · Post by **uprising95** » 11 Mar 2010, 19:34

i just cant see them saying or well its a no vote lets see what else we can think of.

belle smith · Post by **belle smith** » 11 Mar 2010, 21:39

uprising95 wrote:i just cant see them saying or well its a no vote lets see what else we can think of.

Vote no, it might cause higgson some distress!

ROYALMAILCHAT

The vote result

The vote result

Re: The vote result

Re: The vote result

Re: The vote result

Re: The vote result

Re: The vote result