Privatised by the cons if we vote no! Discuss.

[banner18]

Not liking the deal one bit but voting no could mean something worse rears its ugly head on the horizon once the blues get in power.

[el_cartero]

Not liking the deal one bit but voting no could mean something worse rears its ugly head on the horizon once the blues get in power.

vote labour - vote no

[midvillain]

i think it's going to end up privatised whatever we do.

[garymgo]

Even if the deal gets accepted tories will still privatise us.I'm surprised crozier didn't hang around for his free windfall shares, parasite! :cfo

[belle smith]

i think it's going to end up privatised whatever we do.

YES! and we better just accept anything rather than upset them is the phycology of a batterd wife

[steven100]

Yep we are in a no win situation, privatisation is looming whether its tories or new tories. We shouldn't agree to any changes ie no ballot until our pension is sorted out with all big parties agreeing. Our two backstabbers clearly have political asperations for recommending this pants deal.

[belle smith]

Yep we are in a no win situation, privatisation is looming whether its tories or new tories. We shouldn't agree to any changes ie no ballot until our pension is sorted out with all big parties agreeing. Our two backstabbers clearly have political asperations for recommending this pants deal.

I'll be voting NO even with pensions thrown in....They have to pay them anyway it's not optional.

[joe379]

Vote Labour? Labour must love you, treat you like dirt and still you vote for them. Destroyed our industry by allowing unfair competition, huge job losses, getting rid of 10p tax deal. Stealing your pension, no real pay increase in over 2 years, worst recession for decades. Tories could not be any worse, only as bad. And wasn't lovely Gordon the man who said in the last strike 'These people should go back to work'?
Vote Labour? I think not

[BELIAL]

Not much of a threat really is it?
After all what would a privatised RM mean to us?
Job cuts
Wage cuts
Pension cuts
Increased workload

[mcboing boing]

Not liking the deal one bit but voting no could mean something worse rears its ugly head on the horizon once the blues get in power.

Only one option then. Dont vote conservative or lib dem

[jockstrapp]

Not liking the deal one bit but voting no could mean something worse rears its ugly head on the horizon once the blues get in power.

vote labour - vote no

I would rather ACCEPT this crock of sh!te than vote for these thieving BAST@RD labour MPs

[bedfordrl]

We need to vote for a party that represents the working man/woman ,who can listen to the unions and talk to the bosses,who turns their backs on excess and greed,who stands between us and European integration and will give us a referendum,,,, !!!!!,oh yeah ,that was the Labour Party.

[belle smith]

I would rather ACCEPT this crock of sh!te than vote for these thieving BAST@RD labour MPs

depends who your MP is.

[shadow]

Not much of a threat really is it?
After all what would a privatised RM mean to us?
Job cuts
Wage cuts
Pension cuts
Increased workload

No change there then.

[goinpostal]

Not liking the deal one bit but voting no could mean something worse rears its ugly head on the horizon once the blues get in power.

Labour or Tories either one will try to privatise us anyways, they need the money.

But they would be more worried by a fighting union than they would one that rolled over and accepted downsizing i mean modernisation!