if the agreement gets a no

postietaz · Post by **postietaz** » 10 Dec 2009, 22:53

how long we going out for ffs

postietaz · Post by **postietaz** » 10 Dec 2009, 23:00

postietaz · Post by **postietaz** » 10 Dec 2009, 23:07

unpaid meal relieafs so not funny

yes or no tp no meal ticket???

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 10 Dec 2009, 23:25

No, it's called a pay cut

Night Tonic · Post by **Night Tonic** » 10 Dec 2009, 23:32

Doesn't matter if its a yes or no, RM will go ahead anyway.

Post by **piranha** » 11 Dec 2009, 07:40

Night Tonic wrote:Doesn't matter if its a yes or no, RM will go ahead anyway.

And if it's a no they'll blame CWU for everything and resume their propagnada war against us

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 11 Dec 2009, 13:16

And we all walk out again

Till they cave in again

6.75%

Night Tonic · Post by **Night Tonic** » 11 Dec 2009, 14:33

You standing in for Puff The Magic Dragon? Wake up Belial. Look at the numbers leaving the union. Look at the posters on here wanting out. Who was it said RM was on the ropes? Yeah right.

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 11 Dec 2009, 16:30

Cheered me up no end

Time to remind everyone of your less than impressive track record of prediction and forecasting . 2007 'unions finished; there is no more money;you'll never get a pay rise;RM won't negotiate;there will never be another national strike'. Poor old NT the facts keep coming back to wreck your dreams.
Any particular reason why you don't want ordinary hard working folk to be better off?

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 11 Dec 2009, 18:58

BELIAL wrote:Cheered me up no end
Time to remind everyone of your less than impressive track record of prediction and forecasting . 2007 'unions finished; there is no more money;you'll never get a pay rise;RM won't negotiate;there will never be another national strike'. Poor old NT the facts keep coming back to wreck your dreams.
Any particular reason why you don't want ordinary hard working folk to be better off?

Solamen miseris socios habuisse doloris perhaps.

BELIAL · Post by **BELIAL** » 11 Dec 2009, 19:05

No need to get Dolores involved

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 11 Dec 2009, 19:27

fishtank wrote:
BELIAL wrote:Cheered me up no end
Time to remind everyone of your less than impressive track record of prediction and forecasting . 2007 'unions finished; there is no more money;you'll never get a pay rise;RM won't negotiate;there will never be another national strike'. Poor old NT the facts keep coming back to wreck your dreams.
Any particular reason why you don't want ordinary hard working folk to be better off?

Solamen miseris socios habuisse doloris perhaps.

The quote that is - took me ages to find it.

Night Tonic · Post by **Night Tonic** » 11 Dec 2009, 21:39

Lol - thats rich coming from the "we can only win brigade" - lose more like. Fine for those that are daft enough to keep paying money in to maintain King Shrek's lifestyle and still not bright enough to see its over. Hiding behind Hayes big belly won't be much use either.

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 11 Dec 2009, 21:51

Night Tonic wrote:Lol - thats rich coming from the "we can only win brigade" - lose more like. Fine for those that are daft enough to keep paying money in to maintain King Shrek's lifestyle and still not bright enough to see its over. Hiding behind Hayes big belly won't be much use either.

Are you just copying and pasting this post now NT

Night Tonic · Post by **Night Tonic** » 11 Dec 2009, 23:10

No although a rubber stamp would come in handy for the more repetitive posts like "have the union sold us up the river" and "how dare this newspaper say this about us". Monday should be fun though, what with Panorama. That'll keep tongues wagging

ROYALMAILCHAT

if the agreement gets a no

if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no

Re: if the agreement gets a no