ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72692
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :crazy:

http://andrewbrons.eu/2009/12/01/pressu ... ppression/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ANDREW Brons has responded to a personal request from Billy Hayes (left), the General Secretary of the Communications Union, and submitted a Written Question to the European Commission on the treatment of trade unionists in Colombia and how this should impact on the trade agreement between the European Union and Colombia.

“I received an email from Billy yesterday and following on from another request from the National Union of Mineworkers, I decided to table this question in support of their campaign,” Andrew said this morning.

The Written Parliamentary Question reads as follows:

“I have been told by the National Union of Mineworkers and the Communication Workers’ Union that trade unionists are being killed in Colombia, apparently by people acting on behalf of the Government.

“These British trade unions have asked MEPs to suspend the EU-Colombia bilateral trade agreement.

“I should like to ask the Commission whether or not it has evidence that the allegations are correct and, if it does, whether or not it is prepared to suspend this trade agreement.

“If the allegations are indeed true then pressure must be brought to bear to protect trade unions from oppression and prevent the murder of innocent people.”
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by fishtank »

Billy, WTF were you thinking. :no no :no no :no no
Does Billy have a PR advisor yes-sack him/her :wave
No- get one pdq :hmmmm
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Lounge Lizard
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 9458
Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by Lounge Lizard »

So once Billy's sorted everything out in Columbia he can start persuading Royal Mail to give us the terms, conditions and pay that we desere :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana :nana
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72692
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

I am guessing it was not a "personal" request from the CWU or even Billy. I think it was a letter sent to all MEPS (or perhaps just all British MEPs) like most Unions do from time to time and this one has just spun it more than most.

Wonder if Blair or Mandelson taught him.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by DirtyHarry »

I really am losing patience with that idiot Hayes. First, he saves Christmas :roll: , now, he wants to save Colombia. :roll: :roll:

Meanwhile, a devious, untrustworthy, and wholly incompetent management, are preparing for the resumption of hostilities in January, and we'll have Billy the Twit doing all he can not to upset the Labour party. :roll: :roll: :roll:
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by fishtank »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:I am guessing it was not a "personal" request from the CWU or even Billy. I think it was a letter sent to all MEPS (or perhaps just all British MEPs) like most Unions do from time to time and this one has just spun it more than most.

Wonder if Blair or Mandelson taught him.

I think if i was writng to them all TBT, I might forget to put a stamp on the one for Mr Bons,At the very least he have to pay for the privelage. :whistle
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
Stormproof
Posts: 6116
Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
Gender: Female

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by Stormproof »

I don't give a flying **** about other countries, what concerns me I pay towards Billys salary for a communication union in Britain, so perhaps he should concentrate on his job here.
So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets


Illegitimi non carborundum
knackeredneedadayoff
Posts: 342
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 18:19
Gender: Male

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by knackeredneedadayoff »

i am fed up with the ucw rag, we get all about what they are doing for other countries , what about us.i dont give a stuff about other countries its over here i want things done,now wonder this countries going down the pan,as they say this is great britain not rubbish britain.
norbert
Posts: 3027
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by norbert »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:I am guessing it was not a "personal" request from the CWU or even Billy. I think it was a letter sent to all MEPS (or perhaps just all British MEPs) like most Unions do from time to time and this one has just spun it more than most.

Wonder if Blair or Mandelson taught him.
The BNP will spin it for the anti EU angle , I believe they are very pally at meetings with UKIP . The danger is that it might look if the CWU are playing save the world , student politics instead of concentrating on "mundane " matters like job losses and T&C's .

The BNP policy is withdrawal from the EEC , not sure what they plan to replace the EEC with if they want to take the isolationist stance though .
Last edited by norbert on 02 Dec 2009, 01:20, edited 2 times in total.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by BELIAL »

Very well put Norbs :wink:
On a less diplomatic note and ignoring the stormtroopers spin ffs folks this is about our people being skinned by the likes of Crozier and Mandy, they happen to be Columbian. 6million trade unionists got snuffed out in Indonesia with US assistance . Would you raise an eyebrow if half a dozen Scots CWU reps got a bullet in the head?
An injury to one is an injury to all, not an injury to one in my village is an injury to all in my village unless they are different to me.Some of us have got a long way to travel :chuckle
Bye
norbert
Posts: 3027
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by norbert »

BELIAL wrote:Very well put Norbs :wink:
On a less diplomatic note and ignoring the stormtroopers spin ffs folks this is about our people being skinned by the likes of Crozier and Mandy, they happen to be Columbian. 6million trade unionists got snuffed out in Indonesia with US assistance . Would you raise an eyebrow if half a dozen Scots CWU reps got a bullet in the head?
An injury to one is an injury to all, not an injury to one in my village is an injury to all in my village unless they are different to me.Some of us have got a long way to travel :chuckle
I agree , ultimately that Uncle Sam and Latin America is part of the same corporate agenda that :cfo & :mfo subscribe to - might be a good idea for the CWU to put things better - I won't hold my breath
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by Big Daz »

http://www.business-humanrights.org/Cat ... reColombia" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The United Steelworkers Union and the International Labor Rights Fund sued the Coca-Cola Company and two of its Latin American bottlers – Bebidas y Alimentos and Panamerican Beverages, Inc. (Panamco) – in July 2001 in US federal court. The lawsuit was brought by the Colombian trade union Sinaltrainal and five individuals and survivors who allege that the companies hired, contracted with or otherwise directed paramilitary security forces that murdered and tortured the leaders of Sinaltrainal (which represents workers at the bottlers’ facilities). The defendant companies argued that the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate complicity between the companies and the paramilitary security forces. In 2003, the court dismissed the case against Coca-Cola, but it allowed the case to proceed against the two bottlers. The following year the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking to include Coca-Cola in the lawsuit due to its part ownership of Panamco through a 2003 acquisition. In September of 2006, the court dismissed the claims against the two Coca-Cola bottlers and rejected the plaintiffs’ attempt to bring Coca-Cola back into the lawsuit. The court held that the plaintiffs’ claims did not suffice to allege war crimes under international law, because the plaintiffs did not claim that the abuses occurred in the course of hostilities. It also held that plaintiffs’ claims did not suffice to allege violations of other international human rights because the plaintiffs did not claim a sufficiently close relationship between the Colombian Government and the companies’ alleged involvement in the abuses. In August 2009, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit affirmed the lower court's dismissal of the lawsuit.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: BNP MEP ANDREW BONS ANSWERS PERSONAL REQUEST FROM CWU ??

Post by Big Daz »

http://venidaver.wordpress.com/2006/04/ ... -humanity/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

coke, nestle and chiquita tried for crimes against humanity
April 17, 2006 · Leave a Comment

The weekend of 1st and 2nd of April was the first hearing of the People’s Permanent Tribunal’s Colombia Session, during which the multinationals Coca-Cola, Nestle and Chiquita Brands were tried for human rights abuses. The PPT is an international alternative justice mechanism which has the aim establishing the legal responsibilities in situations of massive violations of fundamental rights where there has been no response from official legal institutions. Whilst the PPT can’t actually sentence anyone, the judges are experts in national and international law and work within that framework in order to highlight the truth of the crimes and their causes, so they they can’t just be covered up and erased from historical memory from by the governments and companies who are responsible.

After hearing the testimonies and examining a mountain of written evidence the judges found Coca-Cola directly or indirectly responsible for the assassination of 10 trade unionists and Nestlé responsible for the assassination of 9. Chiquita was found guilty of directly trafficking arms to the paramilitaries. Chiquita is the successor to the United Fruit Company, the US company involved in the Colombian army’s massacre of several hundred striking banana workers on 6th December 1928 and the disappearance of several hundred more over the following weeks – a massacre which provided the inspiration for events in Gabriel García Marquez’s “One Hundred Years of Solitude”:

It hadn’t rained for three months and it was a time of drought. But when Mr Brown announced his decision a torrential rain poured over the banana region, taking José Arcadio Segundo by surprise on the road to Macondo. A week later it was still raining.
The official version, a thousand times repeated across the country through any method of communication the government found within its reach, ended up prevailing: there had been no deaths, the satisfied workers had returned to their families and the banana company had suspended activities until the rain had passed. Martial law remained in place, in case it was necessary to apply emergency measures because of the public calamity posed by the interminable downpour; although the troops were confined to their barracks.
During the day, the soldiers walked through the torrents in the streets, with their trousers rolled halfway up their legs, playing at shipwrecks with the children. At night, after the curfew, they broke down doors with their rifle butts, pulled the suspects from their beds and took them on a journey without return…. “Of course it was a dream”, the officials insisted, nothing has ever happened in Macondo. This is a happy town”. And so they erased from memory the extermination of the union leaders.

Garcia changed little in his account except the name of the company and the town in which the massacre was carried out and the fact that the army’s commanding officer did concede that 9 people had been killed. On 16 January 1929 US embassador Jefferson Caffrey sent a memo to the State Department saying “I have the honour to inform you that the number of striking workers killed exceeds one thousand”. And of course the story doesn’t stop there, or with the dead left by multinationals such as Coca-Cola and Nestle, despite the ongoing official denials.

A few days after the tribunal I left Bogotá with Maria from the campaign against Nestlé in Switzerland for the town of Bugalagrande, which is home to a Nestle factory and little else. We stayed with the biggest trade unionist I have ever seen and were fed to similar proportions by his wife. So much for being in Colombia making me lose weight…

The Sinaltrainal branch in Bugalagrande is one of the biggest and the union have long been involved in projects with the community, such as building a sports centre, providing a low-interest loans facility and running a community kitchen which provides cheap but healthy lunches to families without the means to feed themselves adequately and also tries to raise people’s consciousness about the causes of hunger. Despite the vast quantities of milk, biscuits, chocolate and soup produced by Nestle in Bugalagrande, there are still people nearby without enough access to any of it. Throughout the 1990’s, the union also worked with peasant groups on a project people’s control over their own food production and consumption, but then the paramilitaries arrived and did away with the project and some of the people working on it. We listened to some chilling testimonies from people who’d be threatened and saw how the factory had polluted the river that runs through the town (they managed to kill all the swallows in the area a couple of years ago).
Over the last few years Nestle have increasingly been employing people on a casual basis (though Adecco – the worst temping agency I ever worked for – although here Adecco actually put psychologists in the workers’ houses watch how they spent their money, presumably so they can try to justify paying them less). Even those new employees with contracts get none of the benefits (such as access to healthcare) that the older workers get, and their salary is a whopping 35% lower. Whilst we were there, the union voted to enter a more confrontational negotiation with Nestle to obtain equal rights for the new workers – last time they did this, in the late 80’s, one of the leaders was killed and the main protagonists were sacked. So things could get nasty again in the next few weeks.

I’ve also been getting even more used to public speaking in Spanish, to the point that it’s starting not to bother me anymore…. The day after the tribunal, I had to give a 15 minute talk about the campaign against Coca-Cola in the UK. I had prior warning for this one, although at the meeting in Bugalagrande Maria and I were both called onto the platform and asked to say something without any warning whatsoever – I think I’m going to have to store up some eloquent and rousing sound bites for when I’m called on to speak without notice as I’m starting to run out of intelligent things to say. The Dame Edna disguise hasn’t come out again – bright pink really doesn’t suit me so I’m reserving the glasses for emergencies.

Easter week was very quiet, except for the occasional priest singing tuneless hymns in the streets. Everyone was either praying or off partying in other parts of the country. I worked with Maria on a proposal for the campaign against hunger, which Sinaltrainal launched at the forum after the food and agriculture hearing, although we managed to have some fun too at a goodbye party for a couple of friends who have got grants from the Cuban government to go to medical school in Havana and at a meeting with Sinaltrainal which deteriorated into beer-drinking session (I have to put this in because my dad seems to be worried that I’m being too well behaved – which is only because I don’t offer up information on my bad behaviour for public consumption of course). Penance followed the parties though and I spent the entire weekend in supplication to the god of PhD’s finishing off a rough draft of a chapter and lamenting Colombia’s lack of Cadbury’s buttons Easter Eggs – I mean, struggles for food sovereignty are all very well and I know Cadburys are a big mean company, but I do like the way they engrave little bunnies in the chocolate.