ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by drb »

Lots of negatives about the agreement. What would you have preffered?

The main issue I would imagine is an immediate stop to absorbtion. However maybe some people do have scope for extra work and some don't. I would say though that if the agreement made your walks smaller than we would be back in dispute in 6 months time,as they would want us to work our time.

Now there is an idea......if we stopped our cars/came in on time/took our meal reliefs 10 years ago...would we be in this situation?

Naaah!!! Lets blame "the union"
wood
Posts: 15
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 15:22
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by wood »

:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
Its just a shame many more dont support that view.
rhino49
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 1644
Joined: 04 Jun 2007, 21:50
Gender: Male
Location: At home with my feet up

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by rhino49 »

good comment drb - we often only look at what is convenient for the moment and don't consider long term consequences. Many union members in my office slag off the union but don't follow it's guidelines, and then expect it to be responsible for the problems THEY have caused. Many are cursing an agreement they haven't even seen yet and probably won't see because instead of being curious and finding out, they are waiting for someone to tell them what it is all about - and when eventually told they won't understand a bloody word of it.
We wish to serve - but we will not be servile
tailfly12
Posts: 199
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 12:09
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by tailfly12 »

A Pay rise would have been good.
belle smith
Posts: 1557
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
Gender: Male
Location: scotland

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by belle smith »

A deal on pegasus, being benchmarked against a proper outdoor test. instead of this 4 mph bullshit.
It being the responsability of managment to have to ask staff if they want to work overtime, instead of this crap about telling them if you can't complete thats the only way the harasment will ever stop! and everone returned to there office at finishing time.
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by drb »

I think we should be asking ourselves serious questions now we have reached a new type of employer.

This agreement will bring us back to national agreements,more importantly the IR framework which you register a disagreement and they have a limited time to sort it.This is in the new interim agreement.

However,do we want to be back in this situation in a years time? Because that is what will happen if WE,(yes WE), continue to run around like idiots.
This issue about time/making time/spanish practices is all OUR fault. If you want to blame the union,please note...YOU ARE THE UNION!!!!
Cut Off King
Posts: 1078
Joined: 23 Jun 2009, 21:18
Gender: Female

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by Cut Off King »

I just want an agreement that is BLACK & WHITE .

No GREY area's

And a NATIONAL agreement - not local agreements which mean that one office is working harder that another office a few miles away.
wood
Posts: 15
Joined: 29 Jul 2009, 15:22
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by wood »

Its a shame that many member point the finger of blame at the union.
1. Did the union tell you to use your car?
2. Did the union tell you to run around on your walk?
3. Did the union tell you not to have your full meal break every day?
4. Did the union ask you to start 1-2 hours before your time?
Members will need to get use to working nearer to there times, Without their cars and at a normal pace.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by dvbuk55 »

wood wrote:Its a shame that many member point the finger of blame at the union.
1. Did the union tell you to use your car?
2. Did the union tell you to run around on your walk?
3. Did the union tell you not to have your full meal break every day?
4. Did the union ask you to start 1-2 hours before your time?
Members will need to get use to working nearer to there times, Without their cars and at a normal pace.
Did the union negotiate this deal?
Did the union negotiate the 2007/2009 agreement?
Did the union recommend it?
Did we get a chance to view what was on offer before calling off the strikes?
Did we support the call for strike action?
Did many members give up pay for 16/20 days?
Did we get shafted again?

s**t stinks and no amount of air freshener is going to get rid of the smell.
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by drb »

This was always going to happen..whether we like it or not.Regardless of the economic climate. These idiot chairman/chief execs were given a job to do..and we made it easier for them.

The national agreements are not always my cup of tea.But they are there and once implemented they work.

However us as postie's don't even come to gate meetings cos we are already gone on delivery. Be honest if you've done and then asked someone the next day what the union meeting was about.You can't debate and digest information if you're not there!

This deal,good bad or indifferent,(or any deal for that matter) is s**t, only because WE DON'T LISTEN!!

It's funny really as we don't even turn up on the picket line.We treat it as a day off. This deal will call off a lot of executive action. Has it scared us though? Do we carry on as we did? Major points to debate and ponder......
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by k979aaa »

1=35 HOUR WEEK WITH NO LOSS OF PAY OR BREAKS NOR HOLIDAYS!.
2=ANTI BULLYING AGREEMENT WITH CAST IRON GUARANTEE THAT ALL WHO WORK THE HOUR'S THEY ARE PAID FOR AT A REASONABLE PACE FOR ALL AGES WILL NOT BE BULLIED HARASSED OR CONDUCTED FOR THEIR PERFORMANCE THAT IS ACHIEVABLE FOR ALL!.
3=ALTHOUGH PAY WOULD BE FROZEN OVERTIME MUST REWARD THOSE WHO WISH TO HELP THE BUISNESS/SERVICE AND REFLECT THE NEW WORKING HOURS THEIRFORE IT IS PROPOSED THAT TIME + A QUATER IS A STATED AIM 125% OF THE BASIC WAGE!.
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by drb »

Fair point made. Yes the 35 hour week has gone missing. The crap phase 4 deal might address this,as this is only an interim agreement.

However the bullying side of it,(major point by the way). Well if you get ex-postmen to manage,remember that they "went over" so as to :

Finish early

Not do a walk

They bully because they HAVE to work now.

Stop your cars.....implement the agreement,(phase 4) in January too.....watch the fantasy that is Pegasus collapse. They have based all of the savings on the car issue. This c*** of a contraption is killing our jobs.
fishtank
Posts: 19732
Joined: 28 Sep 2007, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by fishtank »

"This deal,good bad or indifferent,(or any deal for that matter) is s**t, only because WE DON'T LISTEN!!

It's funny really as we don't even turn up on the picket line.We treat it as a day off. This deal will call off a lot of executive action. Has it scared us though? Do we carry on as we did? Major points to debate and ponder......"


Who;s this "we" you speak of?

WE listened and WE did the job properly and WE turned up at the gate even ON our day off.
good times, bad times you know I've had my share
drb
Posts: 1044
Joined: 30 Jan 2007, 21:44
Gender: Male

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by drb »

Sorry Fishtank..my apologies sir! However people like yourselves unfortunatly,(alongside the brilliant unit reps), are a minority.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: What Would You Have Liked In The Agreement?

Post by k979aaa »

drb wrote:Fair point made. Yes the 35 hour week has gone missing. The crap phase 4 deal might address this,as this is only an interim agreement.

However the bullying side of it,(major point by the way). Well if you get ex-postmen to manage,remember that they "went over" so as to :

Finish early

Not do a walk

They bully because they HAVE to work now.

Stop your cars.....implement the agreement,(phase 4) in January too.....watch the fantasy that is Pegasus collapse. They have based all of the savings on the car issue. This c*** of a contraption is killing our jobs.
1 i do not use a car of the ones that do i have tried my best too stop them but it is not cars but BOUNSES FOR MANAGERS that is driveing change and the rush for the cash/hours!.
2 A thirty five hour week would be an achievable goal not only would it give royalmail a stable cost base but would help posties workload balance and sickness abcence targets!.