CUT MANAGER'S

wont cross the line · Post by **wont cross the line** » 02 Nov 2009, 17:32

Royal mail always go on about modernisation but it's always us postmen/women,what about them? i'am sure you could half there workforce .

Captain Scarlet · Post by **Captain Scarlet** » 02 Nov 2009, 17:43

When I started 22yrs ago we had 2 managers doing all the work, now we have 5 or 6 somedays and we only have 50 more staff, a few quid could be saved here I think

redissue · Post by **redissue** » 02 Nov 2009, 17:43

From what ive heard recently,this is in the next round of cuts.

Post by **Wessex** » 02 Nov 2009, 17:50

They will be next

andrew11 · Post by **andrew11** » 02 Nov 2009, 17:54

I agree when I started one manager ran the office, and now we have two something does seem wrong but I would imagine they will be next !

mandelsons_toenail · Post by **mandelsons_toenail** » 02 Nov 2009, 17:57

redissue wrote:From what ive heard recently,this is in the next round of cuts.

go on?

Destroyer · Post by **Destroyer** » 02 Nov 2009, 18:01

Wessex wrote:They will be next

We hear this every time but it never happens - its time for change !

Post by **TrueBlueTerrier** » 02 Nov 2009, 18:14

Yep my guess is in the next 5 years max, we will have a new grade OPG(S) - The (S) will stand for supervisor and he/she will be responsible for a "Team" of 5 or 6.

This, IMO, is why they are so keen on Lapsing as the OPG(S) will have to cover absences from their own "Team" .

celerycelery · Post by **celerycelery** » 02 Nov 2009, 18:21

the office would run perfectly well if 50% of our managers failed to turn up (usually 4 of them) but no way would it run if 50% of us failed to turn up. Funny how on a saturday they only need 2 managers. I say get rid of at least 1 in every office, would save a small fortune.

fishtank · Post by **fishtank** » 02 Nov 2009, 18:30

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:Yep my guess is in the next 5 years max, we will have a new grade OPG(S) - The (S) will stand for supervisor and he/she will be responsible for a "Team" of 5 or 6.

This, IMO, is why they are so keen on Lapsing as the OPG(S) will have to cover absences from their own "Team" .

Who's going to take that grief for probably £30-40 exta a week?

I will answer that myself probably only those least able to do the job.

God help us.

Stumpy · Post by **Stumpy** » 02 Nov 2009, 18:38

We have got over 100 in our office and on more than one occasion, on a Saturday, no managers have shown up.

Everybody gets on with their job and the operation runs much smoother.

redissue · Post by **redissue** » 02 Nov 2009, 18:56

mandelsons_toenail wrote:
redissue wrote:From what ive heard recently,this is in the next round of cuts.
go on?

Cant say,the walls have ears on this site

But its from someone in the know.

dejavu · Post by **dejavu** » 02 Nov 2009, 19:18

We never really ever saw a manager in our office, we could go months before we got a visit and everything just run smoothly. Now we see one at least twice a month and every time they come down its to change summat or read of a piece of paper some notice. Basically they just f**k up our office and lower moral even more.

london sub · Post by **london sub** » 02 Nov 2009, 19:26

I think that having no manager(s) in any office runs more smoothly. I know from this a while back when we had no dom in for a couple of days and everyone just got on with there work with no one on there backs about performance issues, fill this out and that. Let the culling begin

It's going to happen sooner or later

el_cartero · Post by **el_cartero** » 02 Nov 2009, 20:07

No managers?

theres got to be atleast one shurly

who will do the overtime info etc.....

ROYALMAILCHAT

CUT MANAGER'S

CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S

Re: CUT MANAGER'S