ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

USO Agreement

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
woofwoof
Posts: 1516
Joined: 13 Apr 2007, 16:23
Gender: Male
Location: stinky land

Re: USO Agreement

Post by woofwoof »

Maximum weight of 1.25Kg per Packet to be carried in Pouches
Maximum Dimension of 200mm x 200mm x 400mm OR 310mm x 100mm x 400mm to be carried in Pouches



tell your dom to look for

Clear Down And Prepare To Leave Non Motorised Deliveries

it says it in there
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32763
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: USO Agreement

Post by POSTMAN »

You could always print this out.

http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 36&t=12886" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: USO Agreement

Post by andy2007 »

Is it still on the Intranet?
It may have been removed, if it's likley to cause a lot of trouble. If people can't find it, they can't prove what it contains. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
adb2aber
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 304
Joined: 01 Feb 2009, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: USO Agreement

Post by adb2aber »

http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 36&t=19266" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Maximum weight of 1.25Kg per Packet to be carried in Pouches
Maximum Dimension of 200mm x 200mm x 400mm OR 310mm x 100mm x 400mm to be carried in Pouches.
If in doubt, use the Packet template on a DBF to determine whether a Packet is proper to Pouch Delivery OR Motorised Delivery. For Multiple packets to a single address or High volumes of Special Delivery packets that could ‘bulk out’ the first pouch. Speak to you your line Manager.
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: USO Agreement

Post by andy2007 »

WarDog wrote:
andy2007 wrote:Is it still on the Intranet?
It may have been removed, if it's likley to cause a lot of trouble. If people can't find it, they can't prove what it contains. :hmmmm
Andy any chance you can print one off then post it on here unfortunately i dont or they wont give me access to the intanet site its hard enough trying to get on a pc to type up letters in my office
Sorry, I don't have access to the Intranet. That's why I was asking if it was still there. I do have first hand knowledge, of Managers being creative in their interpretation of things (the DDA). And then getting very annoyed, when confronted with the evidence. What's worrying me, is could that be what happened here?
Particularly as you said that you had detqails of where to find it. But your Manager can't find it.

I'm not suggesting that he could have deleted it. But if people elsewhere, have been causing problems, because they have access to the information. It could have been deleted to prevent anyone else getting their hands on it. :hmmmm
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
adb2aber
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 304
Joined: 01 Feb 2009, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: USO Agreement

Post by adb2aber »

I'd suggest a case of the manager not bothering to look myself, it is quite easy to find.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32763
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: USO Agreement

Post by POSTMAN »

WarDog wrote:cheers postman but this is the docunment ive already presented to him and he asked were i got it from. Oviously i didnt put him onto this site but told him were he could find it i think its very convient that he cant find it..
Ok use this one,if that doesn't work and your DIM is still being an arse,i've got the weights and dimensions tattoed on my arse,i'll send you a fecking pic of it to use.

http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 36&t=19266" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: USO Agreement

Post by andy2007 »

adb2aber wrote:I'd suggest a case of the manager not bothering to look myself, it is quite easy to find.
Does that mean that you do, have access to it?
If so, please will you put it on here. So WarDog can use it, to sort out the problems he's having with his DOM. Thanks.
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
adb2aber
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 304
Joined: 01 Feb 2009, 15:37
Gender: Male

Re: USO Agreement

Post by adb2aber »

I have put it on here in the downloads section and linked to it already in this topic (was linked to again by Postman) :shock:

This was on the intranet yesterday, still official policy.

I've also PM'd WarDog the intranet address to find it at for his DIM.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: USO Agreement

Post by dvbuk55 »

WarDog wrote:Cheers chaps letter just typed up for 2moz will be handing in asap with a 7 day written deadline lets just see what happens im taking it that SOP is a fairly recent document and is still in use by R/M . As i dont wan tit to be a case of O WE DONT USE THAT DOCUMENT ANY MORE AS ITS AN OLD ONE.
Strange that - it has been used so many times by managers I think they believe there has actually been new agreements or SOPs but when you ask them to provide the document lo and behold it doesn't exist outside of their small mind.