ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Subsidising

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Subsidising

Post by Big Daz »

Simple question should money made from one company in RM Group be used to subsidise another, especially in terms of pay?

Should wages be determined by the accounts of each individual part of RM group or the RM group as a whole?
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: Subsidising

Post by andy2007 »

That's exactly what used to happen, back when Streamline used to be a separate entity. They used to use the profits from Streamline, to subsidise Stamp Prices. That was how we could afford cheaper Stamps, but 2 Deliveries per day.

First they merged us with Logistics (we all come under Logistics now). Then they let the Competition go for this profitable work. And now we're in the s**t! :evil/mad :arrrghhh :evil/mad
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
paulsmd
Posts: 88
Joined: 12 Oct 2008, 09:04
Gender: Male

Re: Subsidising

Post by paulsmd »

andy2007 wrote:That's exactly what used to happen, back when Streamline used to be a separate entity. They used to use the profits from Streamline, to subsidise Stamp Prices. That was how we could afford cheaper Stamps, but 2 Deliveries per day.
We do that now, we deliver parcelforce parcels. And they get paid for it.
Thats why parcelforce is in profit now. :coolr
Ahebban
Posts: 695
Joined: 19 May 2009, 13:41
Gender: Male
Location: Left of ... Left

Re: Subsidising

Post by Ahebban »

If government and RM had done its job properly in supporting, funding and modernising the business years ago, there would be no need for the frenzied approach now adopted to keep afloat let alone build for the future needs of customers.
Ahebban - anglo-saxon in origin - meaning 'Wages War'

What counts is not necessarily the size of the dog in the fight, what counts is the size of the fight in the dog. - Mark Twain
belle smith
Posts: 1557
Joined: 26 Aug 2008, 17:41
Gender: Male
Location: scotland

Re: Subsidising

Post by belle smith »

Big Daz wrote:Simple question should money made from one company in RM Group be used to subsidise another, especially in terms of pay?

Should wages be determined by the accounts of each individual part of RM group or the RM group as a whole?
losses made as a result of performing public service aspects of our operating licence should be removed from our accounts, ie USO and post office counters. It's contadictry to say you must carry out operations which are loss making, but then have acting commercial (including thoses losses) as the bottom line when discussing pay, pensions and terms and conditions.
poopongjockmcploop
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 22
Joined: 23 Jul 2009, 11:41
Gender: Male

Re: Subsidising

Post by poopongjockmcploop »

public service or commercial company. Govt needs to decide. As a public service, losses are inevitable. As a company, we decide dsa prices, stamp prices etc as we see fit. A public service with a regulator that f@cks us over!Stop subbing labour. And those mps who signed the edm. They put the bullet in the chamber but would they have pulled the trigger at crunchtime