ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

PEC Results

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

PEC Results

Post by Big Daz »

Result (13 to elect)

BROWNE, Phil 7,443 Elected
KAVANAGH, Mick 7,202 Elected
BAULCH, Mark 6,991 Elected
WARD, Ian 6,481 Elected
McLEAN, Lesley 6,396 Elected
WARREN, Dave 6,391 Elected
McCLEAN, Noel 6,376 Elected
MADEN, Carl 6,303 Elected
QUIRKE, Katrina 6,226 Elected
ROBERTSON, Davie 6,212 Elected
MALONE, Joe 6,082 Elected
FARNAN, John 6,078 Elected
KEENLYSIDE, Pete 6,005 Elected
DAVIES, Huw 5,198
O’DONNELL, Paul 4,629
TAIT, Sean 3,945
KILGARIFF, Dennis 3,576
baldrick
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 5038
Joined: 13 Sep 2007, 23:37
Gender: Male

Re: PEC Results

Post by baldrick »

So it would seem that less than 8,000 members actually voted.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4272
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: PEC Results

Post by Martin Walsh »

Sadly only 10% of the membership who was entitled to vote did so the lowest on record.
pinstripe
Posts: 2473
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: PEC Results

Post by pinstripe »

Strangely, I don't remember getting a ballot paper, nor candidate information booklet, nor instructions from my Branch on their preferred candidates, nor any information on these elections. When were they?
I remember discussing it on here towards the end of last year, but everyday just seems to be like Groundhog Day to me.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4272
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: PEC Results

Post by Martin Walsh »

It was in the voice
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: PEC Results

Post by BELIAL »

And what conclusion do we draw from that? It ain't gonna be pretty however you play it.2007 :d'oh!
Bye
bogstandard
Posts: 1074
Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16

Re: PEC Results

Post by bogstandard »

a 10% turnout

that says a lot really doesn't it
what could you conclude from that, the membership don't care? are not interested? don't feel it makes any difference?

to be fair the list could go on, couldn't it.

I suppose the big question now is what would/could or even will, hq do to rectify this if anything at all ?
i would be the first to admit that the feeling is for some the gravy train rolls on, for others it doesn't. :Boo hoo!
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
andy2007
Posts: 3971
Joined: 14 Sep 2007, 10:16
Gender: Male
Location: Earth

Re: PEC Results

Post by andy2007 »

bogstandard wrote:a 10% turnout

that says a lot really doesn't it
what could you conclude from that, the membership don't care? are not interested? don't feel it makes any difference?

to be fair the list could go on, couldn't it.

I suppose the big question now is what would/could or even will, hq do to rectify this if anything at all ?
i would be the first to admit that the feeling is for some the gravy train rolls on, for others it doesn't. :Boo hoo!
But if they keep up that attitude, they will prove themselves right! :arrrghhh :arrrghhh :d'oh! :arrrghhh :arrrghhh
Don't knock Insanity
it's just another outlook on Reality!
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Re: PEC Results

Post by lovejoy »

Awful turnout but just following the trend (downward) of recent years.

Whole process needs a shake-up!

Starting with the sending of national ballot papers inside a magazine. I know it saves money but what sort of message are the union sending to members about the importance (or lack of it) of these elections.
randompostman
Posts: 300
Joined: 22 Apr 2009, 21:24
Gender: Male

Re: PEC Results

Post by randompostman »

lovejoy wrote:Awful turnout but just following the trend (downward) of recent years.

Whole process needs a shake-up!

Starting with the sending of national ballot papers inside a magazine. I know it saves money but what sort of message are the union sending to members about the importance (or lack of it) of these elections.
Most all politicians on all sides thrive on apathy as it keeps them in high paid work with little risk to themselves so why would a union be different?
Big Daz
Posts: 5668
Joined: 17 Apr 2007, 20:27
Gender: Male

Re: PEC Results

Post by Big Daz »

Our Union would be different as most of the PEC were guaranteed to be re elected simply due to the number of canidates being only a handfull above the amount of people on the PEC.