ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
dropbag_clone
Posts: 106
Joined: 13 Oct 2007, 10:43

MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

Post by dropbag_clone »

MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail
Times 1st April 2009

Christine Buckley Industrial Editor

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has suffered the biggest blow yet in his attempts to sell part of Royal Mail, with the Commons Business and Enterprise Select Committee condemning the move as ill-thought-out.

In a report that will be formally published today, the committee expresses concern that the Government will not say how much it expects to get for a 30 per cent stake in the state-owned postal operator and that there is no guarantee that the proceeds from a sale would be pumped back into the struggling business.

MPs also condemn the lack of a figure for investment needed for the business, saying that only “hundreds of millions” had been cited.

The fact that the committee, which is chaired by the Conservative Peter Luff, has unanimously declared that the Government has not “made its case” raises the possibility that the Conservatives, while supporting privatisation, could vote against the plan, using the committee’s report as evidence that the Business Secretary’s plan is flawed.

Mr Luff said that there was an “extraordinary lack of clarity” in the Government’s case for a part-sale, although the need to tackle Royal Mail’s pension deficit and its regulation were urgent. “The committee does not think the Government has yet made its case,” he said. “We agree that the pensions deficit needs to be removed and the regulatory system needs to be reformed as a matter of urgency. However, it does not follow that a part-sale is also necessary.”

However, Mr Luff would not say whether he would vote against the Bill. He said that the committee’s report was being rushed out to allow the Government to make a full response before the Bill’s second reading. He added that he was not confident that the questions would be answered satisfactorily.

The MPs also raise concerns that the Bill would give the Government freedom to sell a greater stake in the future and that Lord Mandelson was reluctant to spell out his intentions. The report says: “The committee is left with the conclusion that either the Government has not fully thought through its position about future share sales or that it has done so and is refusing to reveal its hand.” The select committee is also worried about potential competition issues.

Lord Mandelson said yesterday: “It’s a pity the committee did not take the opportunity to show a sense of vision of the future for Royal Mail but has taken a lowest common denominator approach. This, of course, bridges the differing positions in the committee but does nothing to secure a viable future for Royal Mail.”

The report has been welcomed by the main postal union, which has been waging a vigorous fight against the sale. Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said: “Everyone who looks at this Bill agrees with the need for pension and regulatory change, but as the select committee points out, the case for privatisation has not been made.”

Lord Mandelson has held two meetings with with TNT, the front-runner to take a stake in Royal Mail, according to Pat McFadden, the Postal Services Minister. Mr McFadden said last night that while the Government has received several expressions of interest, no meetings with other potential bidders, such as DHL, UPS or FedEx, had been held.

Letters in numbers

30% Size of the stake in Royal Mail that would be sold

49.9% How much could be sold

60% Royal Mail’s share of strike days in the UK in 2007

£1.2bn Last Government loan to Royal Mail, in 2006. Of that, £600 million is still unspent

Source: Business and Enterprise Select Committee
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

Post by stokes11eg »

dropbag_clone wrote:MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail
Times 1st April 2009

Christine Buckley Industrial Editor

Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary, has suffered the biggest blow yet in his attempts to sell part of Royal Mail, with the Commons Business and Enterprise Select Committee condemning the move as ill-thought-out.

In a report that will be formally published today, the committee expresses concern that the Government will not say how much it expects to get for a 30 per cent stake in the state-owned postal operator and that there is no guarantee that the proceeds from a sale would be pumped back into the struggling business.

MPs also condemn the lack of a figure for investment needed for the business, saying that only “hundreds of millions” had been cited.

The fact that the committee, which is chaired by the Conservative Peter Luff, has unanimously declared that the Government has not “made its case” raises the possibility that the Conservatives, while supporting privatisation, could vote against the plan, using the committee’s report as evidence that the Business Secretary’s plan is flawed.

Mr Luff said that there was an “extraordinary lack of clarity” in the Government’s case for a part-sale, although the need to tackle Royal Mail’s pension deficit and its regulation were urgent. “The committee does not think the Government has yet made its case,” he said. “We agree that the pensions deficit needs to be removed and the regulatory system needs to be reformed as a matter of urgency. However, it does not follow that a part-sale is also necessary.”

However, Mr Luff would not say whether he would vote against the Bill. He said that the committee’s report was being rushed out to allow the Government to make a full response before the Bill’s second reading. He added that he was not confident that the questions would be answered satisfactorily.

The MPs also raise concerns that the Bill would give the Government freedom to sell a greater stake in the future and that Lord Mandelson was reluctant to spell out his intentions. The report says: “The committee is left with the conclusion that either the Government has not fully thought through its position about future share sales or that it has done so and is refusing to reveal its hand.” The select committee is also worried about potential competition issues.

Lord Mandelson said yesterday: “It’s a pity the committee did not take the opportunity to show a sense of vision of the future for Royal Mail but has taken a lowest common denominator approach. This, of course, bridges the differing positions in the committee but does nothing to secure a viable future for Royal Mail.”

The report has been welcomed by the main postal union, which has been waging a vigorous fight against the sale. Billy Hayes, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, said: “Everyone who looks at this Bill agrees with the need for pension and regulatory change, but as the select committee points out, the case for privatisation has not been made.”

Lord Mandelson has held two meetings with with TNT, the front-runner to take a stake in Royal Mail, according to Pat McFadden, the Postal Services Minister. Mr McFadden said last night that while the Government has received several expressions of interest, no meetings with other potential bidders, such as DHL, UPS or FedEx, had been held.

Letters in numbers

30% Size of the stake in Royal Mail that would be sold

49.9% How much could be sold

60% Royal Mail’s share of strike days in the UK in 2007

£1.2bn Last Government loan to Royal Mail, in 2006. Of that, £600 million is still unspent

Source: Business and Enterprise Select Committee
:nana Of course, there is no promise if they sell off pensions will be safe--why don't they just offer to buy our pensions from us, even at a reduced amount? I would take the money and run!Let's face it regardless of wether they sell out or not,
neuther R/M or T.N.t or whoever, will be able to keep the pension pot going-would you take the money?
borders
Posts: 1303
Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10

Re: MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

Post by borders »

how much clout does this committee have ? often it is just lip service , however every little question raised puts pressure on that little slimeball, Mr M.
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
norbert
Posts: 3027
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46

Re: MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

Post by norbert »

borders wrote:how much clout does this committee have ? often it is just lip service , however every little question raised puts pressure on that little slimeball, Mr M.
he's being very thin skinned ? and that's with good reason , the snakeoil salesman ? :mfo
johnsouthwales
Posts: 833
Joined: 05 Mar 2009, 19:07
Gender: Male

Re: MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

Post by johnsouthwales »

http://www.mirror.co.uk/search.cfm?what=royal+mail" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and here comes avi cohen! oh i say! at the same end, he's got one back!!
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72657
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: MPs condemn Lord Mandelson’s proposals for Royal Mail

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

Committee Report available to download at http://www.royalmailchat.co.uk/communit ... 36&t=15475" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.