ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

The latest news and discussion on Royal Mail Shares.Please note the advise given in this forum is unofficial, please use the links we have for a more detailed response or see an independent financial adviser.
All news and discussion on Daniel Kretinsky's full takeover of Royal Mail.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72657
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art.php?id=17378" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

by Jane Loftus, CWU vice-president (personal capacity)

Comrades,

The postal industry faces a deep crisis. It is a crisis made by the government and the management of Royal Mail. Our union has to come together and fight the threats in a much more determined and militant way.

Lord Mandelson, backed to the hilt by Gordon Brown, is determined to ram through the privatisation of Royal Mail, despite overwhelming opposition among the public and inside the Labour Party.

Labour ministers are ready to use Tory votes to overturn party policy. Labour is forced to nationalise banks, and it is simultaneously privatising a crucial public service!

Privatisation would mean profit-hungry firms tearing up the service and lead to tens of thousands of job losses, mass closures and a renewed assault against the union at every level.

Privatisation is not negotiable and there is no price that would make it acceptable to us.

We have strong allies in public support and the backing of every trade union. A victory over privatisation could inspire a fightback much more widely among working people over redundancies and closures. Let’s become the focus for all the pent-up anger over what this government is doing by handing billions to the banks but wrecking services and allowing jobs to be destroyed everywhere.

The CWU has run a strong campaign among our members, MPs and in the press. But we now need urgently to step up the campaign and to confront the reality that Labour ministers are our enemies in this battle, not our allies.

That means:

1. Launching an immediate campaign for industrial action against privatisation and Royal Mail’s failure to secure National agreements with the CWU over cuts, closures, pay, pensions and restructuring.

We will be told that it is illegal to strike over privatisation because it is political. We should remember that our union has frequently had to defy the anti-union laws in order to defend ourselves.

But in any case there are many industrial issues that could trigger a strike ballot now. We should focus on delivering a YES vote and strike action prior to privatisation and the separation of POL.
2. Immediately suspend the cash to Labour and implement E6 conference policy and ballot to cease the funding. Do our members really want to be handing money to Brown and Mandelson just as they sign the death warrant for the public service?

It has to stop, and it has to stop now. Conference policy must be carried out regarding the relationship the Labour party has with the CWU.

Our political fund should be put to better use supporting CWU and other campaigns that defend workers’ rights, oppose wars and combat the rise of the BNP. If Labour MPs don’t support us, we shouldn’t support them.

The CWU should support individuals who agree with union policy and change the political fund to enable this to happen.
3. Step up the public campaign. We need far more of the demonstrations and protests such as the initiative taken by Northamptonshire CWU to protest at Corby and increase the pressure on the local MP. There is massive public support for our campaign. Let’s show that on the streets.

The CWU leadership need to fight on both the Political and Industrial fronts.

Unfortunately this view is not in the majority and we continue to fight with one hand tied behind our backs. We cannot wait for the job losses to kick in before we take strike action to defend ourselves and the Postal industry. It will be too late for too many of us, and too late for the public service.The attacks we face require the national union to unite postal workers to fight against privatisation and job losses. United we can defeat the Labour government and Royal Mail.



© Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

Post by BELIAL »

Theres a shock ,I got the impression Ms loftus was mute ,not a word about 2007, still better late than never :Applause
Bye
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72657
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Re: Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

BELIAL wrote:Theres a shock ,I got the impression Ms loftus was mute ,not a word about 2007, still better late than never :Applause
Having seen her in the flesh I would not describe her as a mute - she is quite handy with that megaphone. :Very Happy
PICT0118.JPG
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Sandyman
Posts: 252
Joined: 21 Sep 2007, 21:09
Gender: Male
Location: Hell in a handcart

Re: Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

Post by Sandyman »

BELIAL wrote:Theres a shock ,I got the impression Ms loftus was mute ,not a word about 2007, still better late than never :Applause
Anyone can have a rant in a personal capacity, that's easy. But would she now dare stand up as an elected CWU NEC member and publically express her beliefs as she didn't in 2007, or is Vice-president too cushy a number to put at risk for her principles?
Spanish practices - Que?
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Re: Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

Post by BELIAL »

Sandyman wrote:
BELIAL wrote:Theres a shock ,I got the impression Ms loftus was mute ,not a word about 2007, still better late than never :Applause
Anyone can have a rant in a personal capacity, that's easy. But would she now dare stand up as an elected CWU NEC member and publically express her beliefs as she didn't in 2007, or is Vice-president too cushy a number to put at risk for her principles?
Dunno her silence was deafening in our last dispute,maybe she was thinking. Lets hope she told the PEC about her conclusions. Did I spot an opportunist? :angel
Bye
norbert
Posts: 3027
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46

Re: Jane Loftus: 'We need a far more determined fight'

Post by norbert »

BELIAL wrote:
Sandyman wrote:
BELIAL wrote:Theres a shock ,I got the impression Ms loftus was mute ,not a word about 2007, still better late than never :Applause
Anyone can have a rant in a personal capacity, that's easy. But would she now dare stand up as an elected CWU NEC member and publically express her beliefs as she didn't in 2007, or is Vice-president too cushy a number to put at risk for her principles?
Dunno her silence was deafening in our last dispute,maybe she was thinking. Lets hope she told the PEC about her conclusions. Did I spot an opportunist? :angel
the CWU were clever enough to neutralize her , it worked ! - let's just say she's been very cute and weighed up the New Labour situation very well - however ! if there was a split RM would have certainly took advantage , I remember RM's McCarthy trying to do that with the London Weighting and National Ballot in 2003 .

Ward's a good organiser if nothing else and it made RM very desperate and scared , a lot of bad feeling carried over to 2007 :hmmmm

If anything Union Politics are as bad as if not worse than National Politics . Look at what's going on with UNITE & the dirty tricks played with their leadership battle i.e. stuff in the Heil on Sunday , the PCS , and most particularly with UNISON , stuff about Yunus Bakhish's demise at work & the union being predicted on a very nasty far right Stormfront web site with inside information from UNISON , there was some very interesting coincidences with dodgy Facebook groups especially if you look at who started them and their members :hmmmm

By coincidence the ex UNISON president Dave Anderson is now MP for Blaydon , their Northern political officer Liz Twist is looking for a New Labour nomination for Houghton & Sunderland , UNISON also wanted to pull the plug on support for Karen Reissemann who had to settle for a pay off in her tribunal . Civil War going on in that union ? , we may have a certain scouse chappie as Shadow Junior Minister for Bakeries in 2010 if there's any truth in rumours and allegations :hmmmm .

It's all got the same pattern or all the same story , same chapter :hmmmm