ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

labour goverment

Postal workers discussion forum. Discuss the day to day life in a Blue Shirt.
mailman71
Posts: 500
Joined: 10 Jun 2007, 08:03

labour goverment

Post by mailman71 »

what is piss-ng me of is that in the 80's when the tories talked about doing the dirty on us we saw them off only for the goverment which is meant to represent the working class to not only knife us inthe back but to turn the knife as well.
there have been plenty of views expressed on here and other forums about our RELATIONSHIP with the labour goverment but as a former member of the labour party i will never vote for them again,a small gesture i know but i hope our union takes the view that all funding for this crowd of imposters is halted
for the members of the labour party and any tories who are thinking of voting against mandelson's bill we salute them the rest should hang their heads in shame on the death of a once great british institution.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: labour goverment

Post by k979aaa »

mailman71 wrote:what is piss-ng me of is that in the 80's when the tories talked about doing the dirty on us we saw them off only for the goverment which is meant to represent the working class to not only knife us inthe back but to turn the knife as well.
there have been plenty of views expressed on here and other forums about our RELATIONSHIP with the labour goverment but as a former member of the labour party i will never vote for them again,a small gesture i know but i hope our union takes the view that all funding for this crowd of imposters is halted
for the members of the labour party and any tories who are thinking of voting against mandelson's bill we salute them the rest should hang their heads in shame on the death of a once great british institution.
What make's it worse it we are paying them too F*CK US ALL OVER and only a third of the LABOUR party have given thier support too us the other two turds of NEW LABOUR have sh*t on us all!.
Shrek
Posts: 103
Joined: 15 Sep 2007, 15:36

Re: labour goverment

Post by Shrek »

Unfortunately for New Labour read Old Tory. Any party who say that they disagree with jobs for the boys (House of Lords, Quangos and Heads of Public Companies) and then proceeds to abuse its power more fervently than the previous administrations (which they said were crooked) deserve nothing but scorn and unemployment.
slave
Posts: 433
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 21:39
Location: North West

Re: labour goverment

Post by slave »

Labour?? Who?
I certainly won't see their name come the next election, the scum deserve to be shafted out of power.
Broxi51
Posts: 1154
Joined: 30 Jul 2007, 19:04
Location: Scotland

Re: labour goverment

Post by Broxi51 »

I emailed Billy Hayes 2 weeks ago about disaffiliating from Labour. Below is my email and his answer :evil/mad

Dear Billy,
As a union member and a deputy rep at my delivery office I would like to urge you to carry out the disaffiliation from Labour ballot as soon as possible. This government is listening to no one and is trying to destroy a fantastic service to the community. As a service, our hearts reach out to the public and we will always continue to give 110% for them but if this privatisation comes through then it will be destroyed. Profit will win over service every time in this Labour controlled UK. I realise that it will be sad that it has to come to this but if the end result sees us being triumphant against Gordon Brown, Darling, Mandy and the rest of the Blackadder wannabes then now is the time. I urge you to put the vote to the members now so that we can be ready to disaffiliate as soon as possible.

Kind regards

xxxxxxx


Dear Sxxxxx,

Thank you for your email.

The Union has launched a campaign against Mandelson’s proposals, and we aim to defeat these proposals, as we have similar proposals in the past. The CWU’s NEC will examine the funding of the Labour Party as part of this campaign.

Yours sincerely,

BILLY HAYES
GENERAL SECRETARY
The time has come to stop turning the other cheek, time to stop shaking our heads in bitter dismay, time to stop mumbling our angry words.
The time has come for union.
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: labour goverment

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

Broxi51 wrote:

Dear Sxxxxx,

Thank you for your email.

The Union has launched a campaign against Mandelson’s proposals, and we aim to defeat these proposals, as we have similar proposals in the past. The CWU’s NEC will examine the funding of the Labour Party as part of this campaign.

Yours sincerely,

BILLY HAYES
GENERAL SECRETARY
I'll bet that will be an interesting meeting.

Jane Loftus: "Billy, for goodness sake, will you finally stop funding New Labour? Illegal wars, increasing gap between rich and poor, they've stolen our pension money and now this!"

Billy Hayes: "Get off me case will yer Jane! I could be bloody MP for West Derby once they've de-selected Bob Wareing and there's you, going on and on about socialism. Anyone seen that friggin' bottle opener?"

Jane Loftus: "But Billy, we have a duty to our members to look after their interests................"

Billy Hayes: "Ar ey girl! I could be the new Alan Johnson and yer crampin' me style. I could have sworn there was another three bottles of Cains ale in did friggin' fridge! Wardy, 'av you 'ad them bottles of ale I put in this fridge?"

Jane Loftus: "Billy, I think you should tell Gordon Brown that if he.............Billy! Billy!"

Dave Ward: "Cor blimey! 'Ees only gorn and fell asleep again! Fancy a bottle of beer gal?"
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
pinstripe
Posts: 2473
Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
Gender: Male
Location: 2 left turns from reality

Re: labour goverment

Post by pinstripe »

IWW, are you bugging Billy's office you naughty boy, you know it's illegal. Don't let them catch you, now any chance you could do Mandy, Brown and Crozier?
RTI
Posts: 216
Joined: 19 Oct 2007, 14:28

Re: labour goverment

Post by RTI »

so if you cant get thru to mr hayes as he has other things on his mind, its time for him to go. i remember writing just after the strike that he had to go then, but it all went quiet. hes gotta go. with all the chances he has had to fight our corner and let the public really know whats going on, hes just repeated the same old crap, as if hes reading off a script. theres no passion, or care from our so called leader.

time to stop paying union fees i think???
“If you can deliver a letter to Scotland in a day for 39p, take it yourself.” - Jack Dee
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: labour goverment

Post by stokes11eg »

Grantyboy wrote:so if you cant get thru to mr hayes as he has other things on his mind, its time for him to go. i remember writing just after the strike that he had to go then, but it all went quiet. hes gotta go. with all the chances he has had to fight our corner and let the public really know whats going on, hes just repeated the same old crap, as if hes reading off a script. theres no passion, or care from our so called leader.

time to stop paying union fees i think???
:nana Yes, maybe it would be best if we did this---we get no value for money, do we!
norbert
Posts: 3027
Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46

Re: labour goverment

Post by norbert »

pinstripe wrote:IWW, are you bugging Billy's office you naughty boy, you know it's illegal. Don't let them catch you, now any chance you could do Mandy, Brown and Crozier?
the irony is that there is allegedly - more than a grain of truth in that satire , a born Union Beaurocrat and old school tub - thumper & Labourite but it's just like some of the RM managers , basically over promoted due to the Peter Principle .

People from other Unions say the CWU rank & file are very demanding and he has a difficult job at a obviously difficult time but the wrong person is the GS . They also find him to be embarrassingly stereotypical - RM & New Labour Ministers must love it .
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: labour goverment

Post by stokes11eg »

norbert wrote:
pinstripe wrote:IWW, are you bugging Billy's office you naughty boy, you know it's illegal. Don't let them catch you, now any chance you could do Mandy, Brown and Crozier?
the irony is that there is allegedly - more than a grain of truth in that satire , a born Union Beaurocrat and old school tub - thumper & Labourite but it's just like some of the RM managers , basically over promoted due to the Peter Principle .

People from other Unions say the CWU rank & file are very demanding and he has a difficult job at a obviously difficult time but the wrong person is the GS . They also find him to be embarrassingly stereotypical - RM & New Labour Ministers must love it .
:nana Yip-The word embarrassing applies to Billy Boy- i cringe when i see him trying to defend (EH?) us?
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: labour goverment

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

pinstripe wrote:IWW, are you bugging Billy's office you naughty boy, you know it's illegal. Don't let them catch you, now any chance you could do Mandy, Brown and Crozier?

Brown: "Adam, I love you!"
Crozier: "Kiss me you fool!"
The door suddenly bursts open.
Mandelson: "Oh! I see it all now! I thought I was the only one in your life Gordon!"
Brown: "Peter, love like this can't be wrong!"
Crozier: "Go away Peter. All I'm asking is for our people to work the hours we're paying them for. Carry on Gordon! Six million quid goes a long way."
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
greynut
Posts: 334
Joined: 09 Nov 2007, 15:36
Location: Shitsville

Re: labour goverment

Post by greynut »

:mfo
Grantyboy wrote:so if you cant get thru to mr hayes as he has other things on his mind, its time for him to go. i remember writing just after the strike that he had to go then, but it all went quiet. hes gotta go. with all the chances he has had to fight our corner and let the public really know whats going on, hes just repeated the same old crap, as if hes reading off a script. theres no passion, or care from our so called leader.

time to stop paying union fees i think???
This is exactly how I feel. But, and its a big but, those fees are worth it if management come down on us, as I believe they will, from April when the grievance laws change. We can be sacked straight off. No three step rules anymore. see http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/ ... /DG_173160" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So I know it would be a great protest if thousands of us stopped paying. But see it as a kind of insurance policy. If you are taken down the disciplinary route at least the union will work for you for once.
stokes11eg
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 3077
Joined: 20 Nov 2008, 12:51
Gender: Female

Re: labour goverment

Post by stokes11eg »

greynut wrote::mfo
Grantyboy wrote:so if you cant get thru to mr hayes as he has other things on his mind, its time for him to go. i remember writing just after the strike that he had to go then, but it all went quiet. hes gotta go. with all the chances he has had to fight our corner and let the public really know whats going on, hes just repeated the same old crap, as if hes reading off a script. theres no passion, or care from our so called leader.

time to stop paying union fees i think???
This is exactly how I feel. But, and its a big but, those fees are worth it if management come down on us, as I believe they will, from April when the grievance laws change. We can be sacked straight off. No three step rules anymore. see http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Employment/ ... /DG_173160" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

So I know it would be a great protest if thousands of us stopped paying. But see it as a kind of insurance policy. If you are taken down the disciplinary route at least the union will work for you for once.
:nana Yes, but there is nothing to stop people defending themselves, you can bumff up on all the relevant company
and legal issues, and defend yourself quite well. or save up what you would pay in union fees, and see a specalist
lawyer. And. no, we should not have to even think of doing this, but THIS union is NOT fairly representing us. I have often though that some of the fees paid, should go to your shop floor reps (The good ones of course!) It is a time consuming job, and quite often costs a lot of personal money. However, they ARE at the grass roots level, and should be able to
fight on a day to day basis,if the Unions are allowing the job to become fractured, with local, rather than national
policies being allowed to filter through, then that should be the case with the Unions.