door 2 door agreement

woofwoof · Post by **woofwoof** » 05 Dec 2008, 19:11

shoved the door 2 door agrement rearding prep time in the doms face ,said they u go now ask for extra hours to get the bag carriers ready

the answer from the som was that is just an amendment im not having that i want the full agreement

so what now

brothermagrew · Post by **brothermagrew** » 05 Dec 2008, 19:25

woofwoof wrote:shoved the door 2 door agrement rearding prep time in the doms face ,said they u go now ask for extra hours to get the bag carriers ready

the answer from the som was that is just an amendment im not having that i want the full agreement

so what now

Tell the twat to write to the Outdoor Department at CWU HQ.

Post by **dpb** » 05 Dec 2008, 19:38

original door to door agreement should be attached..

woofwoof · Post by **woofwoof** » 05 Dec 2008, 19:42

dpb wrote:original door to door agreement should be attached..

yep thats the one we had

Picket · Post by **Picket** » 07 Dec 2008, 10:22

I recently approached our DOM with the 1995/6 agreement on D2D's like yourself with concerns over prep time. There can be no argument that all D2D work, thats prep and delivery should be able to be fulfilled within working hours. I've a reply from Bob Gibson informing me of exactly that. However anyone who reads the agreement and the later amendment will find its not exactly that clear. The way i understand it is that everyone has an allocated prep time for their duty, i.e letters, flats, packets, redi's and dead mail ....you should also have the time within this prep time to prep 20% of your D2D's...if you find that you have not, then its a case that you don't have enough prep time for your duty. I personally would like to see a clearer agreement on D2D's, although i beleive there are disscussions to be had over the future of D2D's.

Big Daz · Post by **Big Daz** » 07 Dec 2008, 19:16

Lets hope we get a updated crystal clear aggrement on d to d that includes all aspects of d to d.

Dont forget conference passed a motion on plain english!!!!!!

shelanda · Post by **shelanda** » 07 Dec 2008, 19:34

I have used this on a number of doms, they all have been dumb struck the usual reply is, that is too old! My answer, show me something more up to date at least I have something in writing, where's yours?? That usually ends that debate! Then ask them the question if it has to be done in our time then we don't have to do them, do you want them done or not? If it is our time then it is voluntary and we don't want to do them.

DGP1 · Post by **DGP1** » 07 Dec 2008, 19:37

Big Daz wrote:Lets hope we get a updated crystal clear aggrement on d to d that includes all aspects of d to d.

Dont forget conference passed a motion on plain english!!!!!!

If they put everything in Plain English then they couldn't use bluff and bluster to try to get everything they want (they are RM).