For that to happen they'd need to decide which MCs and DOs would be letters only and which ones would be packets only.Judgee wrote: ↑31 Aug 2026, 20:44RM bosses don't want it to work and they know it can't work.
But failure will open up the opportunity to remove the mail delivery side of the operation. With the potential to renationalise the letters side of the operation and retain the profitable parcels. As long as they have shown they "tried" to make it work is all they need.
It will happen.![]()
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Scrapping DM 26
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12132
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
-
Mr Rush
- Posts: 3290
- Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
Then the company can embrace its wildest fantasies, often seen leaked on here to make the latest agreement look highly conservative: no DOs, just owner-drivers pulling into a car park in an industrial estate while an HGV offloads walk-sorted yorks of packets straight off the back fresh from the IDS-owned Superhub. The MCs will have all been flogged off for the land under them and IDS will charge the government exorbitant fees to process stuff through the Superhub(s). As for the drastically reduced cohort left with the letters to deliver, it'll be the Yodel model where a van comes by your house and slings some trays. Zero local infrastructure.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑31 Aug 2026, 22:36For that to happen they'd need to decide which MCs and DOs would be letters only and which ones would be packets only.
The machine stops.
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12132
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
The union could have run a strike ballot.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:18So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.![]()
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
They haven’t gone live in any large offices yet. That’s when it will explode if they ignore demands to staff it correctlySpacePhoenix wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:37The union could have run a strike ballot.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:18So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.![]()
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12132
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
One of the larger DOs locally has already gone over. Before DTS come in, they were one of 3 DOs where we done the sequencing on the iLSM.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:57They haven’t gone live in any large offices yet. That’s when it will explode if they ignore demands to staff it correctlySpacePhoenix wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:37The union could have run a strike ballot.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:18So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.![]()
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
It’s not a large office. It will be a medium.SpacePhoenix wrote: ↑Yesterday, 22:14One of the larger DOs locally has already gone over. Before DTS come in, they were one of 3 DOs where we done the sequencing on the iLSM.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:57They haven’t gone live in any large offices yet. That’s when it will explode if they ignore demands to staff it correctlySpacePhoenix wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:37The union could have run a strike ballot.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:18So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.![]()
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
And there we have it. Classic British trade unionism. It's okay if some of the membership lose. There's a simple calculation taught on the stage one reps course - you're only as strong as your weakest member. It is the CWU fault. The agreement works in our favour if it's used properly. The CWU isn't good enough to achieve that.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:57They haven’t gone live in any large offices yet. That’s when it will explode if they ignore demands to staff it correctlySpacePhoenix wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:37The union could have run a strike ballot.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:18So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.![]()
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
The membership voted YES to this.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 06:24And there we have it. Classic British trade unionism. It's okay if some of the membership lose. There's a simple calculation taught on the stage one reps course - you're only as strong as your weakest member. It is the CWU fault. The agreement works in our favour if it's used properly. The CWU isn't good enough to achieve that.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:57They haven’t gone live in any large offices yet. That’s when it will explode if they ignore demands to staff it correctlySpacePhoenix wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:37The union could have run a strike ballot.Barnacle wrote: ↑Yesterday, 21:18So if the union say No Go and RM go ahead anyway and it’s a shambles, that’s still the union’s fault is it?tramssirhc wrote: ↑Yesterday, 20:11It absolutely is the unions fault. The agreement is clear that its a no go if it's not right but the CWU just wont say no.Barnacle wrote: ↑01 Sep 2026, 16:32RM are laughing. Kretinsky chuckles. They absolutely love the way that they get no blame for the shambles they have created. Only the union which tried to stop it is blamed.hans solo wrote: ↑30 Aug 2026, 08:09This is what were looking to do on mon/tue
Meeting re physical and mental fatigue on daily basis
There is no work life balance
Your going home shattered ill stressed
Unable to enjoy rest of your day
Not even fit to look after kids etc
They have turned the workforce back to victorian standards
No duty of care from either RM or CWU
Offer OT crumbs in mornings to enable delivery gets out
Whilst increasing an already pressured outdoor element
So f**k you martin dave pec we are not putting up with forced conditions much longer
OFCOM agreed with RM to allow them to deliver 2c every other day and not at all on a Saturday. So DM26 or Heavy & Light, was on the cards from the day of that decision.
RM wanted the ODM which would have resulted in more job losses. The CWU successfully argued for a lesser version, DM26.
If DM26 doesn’t work, RM will have to stop trying to make their cuts via the backs of posties. Perhaps they should start looking at other parts of the business.
But in the meantime for the love of Mike, stop blaming the union for a shambles created by RM management.![]()
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
The membership voted YES to this.Barnacle wrote: ↑Today, 06:30
And there we have it. Classic British trade unionism. It's okay if some of the membership lose. There's a simple calculation taught on the stage one reps course - you're only as strong as your weakest member. It is the CWU fault. The agreement works in our favour if it's used properly. The CWU isn't good enough to achieve that.
[/quote]
No they didn't. A minority did.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
No they didn't. A minority did.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 06:44The membership voted YES to this.Barnacle wrote: ↑Today, 06:30
And there we have it. Classic British trade unionism. It's okay if some of the membership lose. There's a simple calculation taught on the stage one reps course - you're only as strong as your weakest member. It is the CWU fault. The agreement works in our favour if it's used properly. The CWU isn't good enough to achieve that.
[/quote]
YES won out. That’s democracy
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’
-
tramssirhc
- Posts: 1850
- Joined: 04 Sep 2012, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Scrapping DM 26
YES won out. That’s democracyBarnacle wrote: ↑Today, 06:51No they didn't. A minority did.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 06:44The membership voted YES to this.Barnacle wrote: ↑Today, 06:30
And there we have it. Classic British trade unionism. It's okay if some of the membership lose. There's a simple calculation taught on the stage one reps course - you're only as strong as your weakest member. It is the CWU fault. The agreement works in our favour if it's used properly. The CWU isn't good enough to achieve that.
[/quote]
Again, here we have classic British trade unionism. The majority loses.
"The leadership will sabotage the fight and only make the slightest move under fear of powerful working class action" - Des Warren
-
Barnacle
- Posts: 2879
- Joined: 13 Dec 2022, 16:58
- Gender: Female
- Location: Earth
Re: Scrapping DM 26
Again, here we have classic British trade unionism. The majority loses.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 07:36YES won out. That’s democracyBarnacle wrote: ↑Today, 06:51No they didn't. A minority did.tramssirhc wrote: ↑Today, 06:44The membership voted YES to this.Barnacle wrote: ↑Today, 06:30
And there we have it. Classic British trade unionism. It's okay if some of the membership lose. There's a simple calculation taught on the stage one reps course - you're only as strong as your weakest member. It is the CWU fault. The agreement works in our favour if it's used properly. The CWU isn't good enough to achieve that.
[/quote]
People who don’t vote don’t have a voice. The majority need to get off their arses and vote otherwise you get what the people who do vote want.
That is democracy.
’You can't just ask customers what they want and then try to give that to them. By the time you get it built, they'll want something new.’