ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
CRIBMAD
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by CRIBMAD »

POSTMAN wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:55
Image
"so Mr Thompson can you confirm you were in fact wearing a seat belt ?" - " Of course i was you stupid fooker"
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by DirtyHarry »

He has clearly misled parliament here.
He's been very less than honest.
And because he is clearly in the wrong, squirming like the worm we know he is.

Probably, earned himself a knighthood.
dazzler123
Posts: 479
Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by dazzler123 »

its like they were setting him up all the way until the end pulling out that parcel poster from the office frame. Knowing full well he was full of crap from the start
walthmstowman
Posts: 513
Joined: 25 Sep 2022, 15:17
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by walthmstowman »

dazzler123 wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 12:01
This is absloutely glorious, he is getting crucified for about 90 mins. He is looking a fool
Absolutely . He either can’t or won’t answer some of these questions. It’s now clear for the world to see that we have the wrong CEO running Royal Mail . Thompson himself proved that this morning . IMO , he’s now on borrowed time and his position is untenable.
roman
Posts: 265
Joined: 15 Jun 2020, 20:19
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by roman »

He’s payed to be a bit frugal shall we say with the truth.A bit like an MP answering a question with another answer. I don’t suppose he’ll lose any sleep over it.He’ll take his well earned bonus at the end of the financial year and go somewhere else to enhance their profits for shareholders and directors !!
Halfhappy
Posts: 389
Joined: 30 Jul 2021, 09:54
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Halfhappy »

chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38
The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?

What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.

Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.

By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
Yup... Blame everyone else, but the pillock who couldn't answer a question straight. I know... I know, it's gonna be hard knocking one off to that, but I'm sure you'll soldier through for Simon.
SPECIALTRACKED
Posts: 72
Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 10:52
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by SPECIALTRACKED »

roman wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 16:47
He’s payed to be a bit frugal shall we say with the truth.A bit like an MP answering a question with another answer. I don’t suppose he’ll lose any sleep over it.He’ll take his well earned bonus at the end of the financial year and go somewhere else to enhance their profits for shareholders and directors !!
Yep walks off into sunset with a big pot of cash and can forget all about Royal Mail, unlike the rest of us
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1259
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

If it wasn’t so serious it would be funny. He is running one of the last Great British company’s into the ground with incompetence.
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by daveyeff »

what i don't get is, when he is questioned about the 758 million quid profit, he replies ''thats across the whole group, RMs profit was 416 million. that means GLS, supposedly the ''MONEY'' making side off the business made 342 million. that less than our side made.?? unless they are of course lying about that side of the business also. :hmmmm
postieblueshirt
Posts: 1241
Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by postieblueshirt »

first time ive seen someones b@lls shrink on video :oops:
Cedar_Room
Posts: 826
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 14:09

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Cedar_Room »

Halfhappy wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 16:50
chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38
The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?

What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.

Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.

By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
Yup... Blame everyone else, but the pillock who couldn't answer a question straight. I know... I know, it's gonna be hard knocking one off to that, but I'm sure you'll soldier through for Simon.
:chuckle
“Shorts,in this weather?!”

“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”

“What’s she been ordering now?”
Rommagic
Posts: 1495
Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Rommagic »

chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38
The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?

What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.

Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.

By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!

Where you get info about pay from?.
theargyspy
Posts: 252
Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 17:02
Gender: Male
Location: UK

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by theargyspy »

Wouldn't now be a good time to strike while the irons hot?
I know RM have been cute in rarely putting in writing that we have to prioritise tracked packets etc over letters, but if thousands of us were to email those members on that select committee from around the country telling them that we have been instructed in daily huddles to do just that, if necessary leave letters in the frame and concentrate on tracked that could only help the cause, after all we all know from our own experiences that ST is lying!

So what we need are the email addresses of those select committee MPs?
"Never have I known an employee so keen to employ you, then so eager to get rid of you!"
daveyeff
Posts: 4699
Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by daveyeff »

theargyspy wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 17:32
Wouldn't now be a good time to strike while the irons hot?
I know RM have been cute in rarely putting in writing that we have to prioritise tracked packets etc over letters, but if thousands of us were to email those members on that select committee from around the country telling them that we have been instructed in daily huddles to do just that, if necessary leave letters in the frame and concentrate on tracked that could only help the cause, after all we all know from our own experiences that ST is lying!

So what we need are the email addresses of those select committee MPs?
the way Dave Ward mentioned the talks in that, it doesn't sound like he's too optimistic of the outcome, so we'll be out soon enough.
scoobydo79
Posts: 2046
Joined: 15 May 2011, 19:04
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by scoobydo79 »

daveyeff wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 16:59
what i don't get is, when he is questioned about the 758 million quid profit, he replies ''thats across the whole group, RMs profit was 416 million. that means GLS, supposedly the ''MONEY'' making side off the business made 342 million. that less than our side made.?? unless they are of course lying about that side of the business also. :hmmmm
Probably are. GLS probably did pretty nicely out of us during COVID too I expect.