"so Mr Thompson can you confirm you were in fact wearing a seat belt ?" - " Of course i was you stupid fooker"
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Select Committee on CWU Twitter
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
He has clearly misled parliament here.
He's been very less than honest.
And because he is clearly in the wrong, squirming like the worm we know he is.
Probably, earned himself a knighthood.
He's been very less than honest.
And because he is clearly in the wrong, squirming like the worm we know he is.
Probably, earned himself a knighthood.
-
dazzler123
- Posts: 479
- Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
its like they were setting him up all the way until the end pulling out that parcel poster from the office frame. Knowing full well he was full of crap from the start
-
walthmstowman
- Posts: 513
- Joined: 25 Sep 2022, 15:17
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
Absolutely . He either can’t or won’t answer some of these questions. It’s now clear for the world to see that we have the wrong CEO running Royal Mail . Thompson himself proved that this morning . IMO , he’s now on borrowed time and his position is untenable.dazzler123 wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 12:01This is absloutely glorious, he is getting crucified for about 90 mins. He is looking a fool
-
roman
- Posts: 265
- Joined: 15 Jun 2020, 20:19
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
He’s payed to be a bit frugal shall we say with the truth.A bit like an MP answering a question with another answer. I don’t suppose he’ll lose any sleep over it.He’ll take his well earned bonus at the end of the financial year and go somewhere else to enhance their profits for shareholders and directors !!
-
Halfhappy
- Posts: 389
- Joined: 30 Jul 2021, 09:54
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
Yup... Blame everyone else, but the pillock who couldn't answer a question straight. I know... I know, it's gonna be hard knocking one off to that, but I'm sure you'll soldier through for Simon.chrisj wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 14:38The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!
However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?
The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected
On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...
What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?
What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.
Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.
By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
-
SPECIALTRACKED
- Posts: 72
- Joined: 24 Mar 2020, 10:52
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
Yep walks off into sunset with a big pot of cash and can forget all about Royal Mail, unlike the rest of usroman wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 16:47He’s payed to be a bit frugal shall we say with the truth.A bit like an MP answering a question with another answer. I don’t suppose he’ll lose any sleep over it.He’ll take his well earned bonus at the end of the financial year and go somewhere else to enhance their profits for shareholders and directors !!
-
Clappedoutpostie
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
If it wasn’t so serious it would be funny. He is running one of the last Great British company’s into the ground with incompetence.
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
what i don't get is, when he is questioned about the 758 million quid profit, he replies ''thats across the whole group, RMs profit was 416 million. that means GLS, supposedly the ''MONEY'' making side off the business made 342 million. that less than our side made.?? unless they are of course lying about that side of the business also. 
-
postieblueshirt
- Posts: 1241
- Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
first time ive seen someones b@lls shrink on video 
-
Cedar_Room
- Posts: 826
- Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 14:09
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
Halfhappy wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 16:50Yup... Blame everyone else, but the pillock who couldn't answer a question straight. I know... I know, it's gonna be hard knocking one off to that, but I'm sure you'll soldier through for Simon.chrisj wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 14:38The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!
However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?
The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected
On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...
What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?
What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.
Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.
By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
“Shorts,in this weather?!”
“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”
“What’s she been ordering now?”
“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”
“What’s she been ordering now?”
-
Rommagic
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: 10 Sep 2007, 16:52
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
chrisj wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 14:38The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!
However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?
The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected
On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...
What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?
What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.
Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.
By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
Where you get info about pay from?.
-
theargyspy
- Posts: 252
- Joined: 23 Apr 2007, 17:02
- Gender: Male
- Location: UK
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
Wouldn't now be a good time to strike while the irons hot?
I know RM have been cute in rarely putting in writing that we have to prioritise tracked packets etc over letters, but if thousands of us were to email those members on that select committee from around the country telling them that we have been instructed in daily huddles to do just that, if necessary leave letters in the frame and concentrate on tracked that could only help the cause, after all we all know from our own experiences that ST is lying!
So what we need are the email addresses of those select committee MPs?
I know RM have been cute in rarely putting in writing that we have to prioritise tracked packets etc over letters, but if thousands of us were to email those members on that select committee from around the country telling them that we have been instructed in daily huddles to do just that, if necessary leave letters in the frame and concentrate on tracked that could only help the cause, after all we all know from our own experiences that ST is lying!
So what we need are the email addresses of those select committee MPs?
"Never have I known an employee so keen to employ you, then so eager to get rid of you!"
-
daveyeff
- Posts: 4699
- Joined: 12 Mar 2010, 19:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
the way Dave Ward mentioned the talks in that, it doesn't sound like he's too optimistic of the outcome, so we'll be out soon enough.theargyspy wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 17:32Wouldn't now be a good time to strike while the irons hot?
I know RM have been cute in rarely putting in writing that we have to prioritise tracked packets etc over letters, but if thousands of us were to email those members on that select committee from around the country telling them that we have been instructed in daily huddles to do just that, if necessary leave letters in the frame and concentrate on tracked that could only help the cause, after all we all know from our own experiences that ST is lying!
So what we need are the email addresses of those select committee MPs?
-
scoobydo79
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: 15 May 2011, 19:04
- Gender: Male
Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter
Probably are. GLS probably did pretty nicely out of us during COVID too I expect.daveyeff wrote: ↑17 Jan 2023, 16:59what i don't get is, when he is questioned about the 758 million quid profit, he replies ''thats across the whole group, RMs profit was 416 million. that means GLS, supposedly the ''MONEY'' making side off the business made 342 million. that less than our side made.?? unless they are of course lying about that side of the business also.![]()