ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
yellowbelly
Posts: 3713
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by yellowbelly »

antcpfc wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 13:11
Even a Tory MP didn’t believe hi when he said there was no instruction to prioritise parcels over letters.
It was so bad I ( nearly) felt sorry for-him :dance
If you're referring to the eloquent Darren Jones (who holds up the office produced poster about priority of delivery)
he's actually a Labour MP!

Love this:
Darren Jones, chair of the select committee: “I’d remind you, Mr Thompson, that misleading parliament
is not something that we appreciate here on the committee.”
Aah, just seen you probably mean Ruth Edwards, but yeah fantastic roasting!!
Last edited by yellowbelly on 17 Jan 2023, 13:58, edited 1 time in total.
mjd24
Posts: 1406
Joined: 11 May 2008, 18:48

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by mjd24 »

It was just wonderful viewing to see ST pulled up and called out on the continuous slurry of lies that flows from his mouth. A particular highlight for me was his strange little facial tick he seemed to do at the end of answering each question- possibly a reaction to having just told a lie and a deeply buried sense of shame slipping out.
dazzler123
Posts: 479
Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by dazzler123 »

antcpfc wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 13:11
Even a Tory MP didn’t believe hi when he said there was no instruction to prioritise parcels over letters.
It was so bad I ( nearly) felt sorry for-him :dance
Notice the guys behind him shake their heads and start laughing when he says that.

The MP literally said after the first interview answer, don't avoid the question. Kept that tone all the way through
yellowbelly
Posts: 3713
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by yellowbelly »

Darren Jones, select committee chair: “My Thompson, if I might politely say so, I’ve not been very pleased with your answers today... it’s really important that you answer questions clearly & might I say as honestly as possible, because your performance gives us grave concerns”.
Probably because he couldn't have anyone writing the answers down on a whiteboard for him today................
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3211
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Acca Dacca »

TrueBlueTerrier wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 12:26
One thing he did leak is that they have made 12 concessions in the talks and one was an improved pay offer. Guess we'll find out soon how much. 10:22 time stamp
Think thats just from the original 'offer' in the summer rather than their 'best and final' crap in the winter
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
antcpfc
Posts: 628
Joined: 18 Sep 2007, 17:25

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by antcpfc »

.
Slider tool. Lol.
CRIBMAD
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 835
Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by CRIBMAD »

Thompson must be in serious s**t , Gazzas just turned up at RM headquarters with his fishing rods and a bucket of KFC ! :dance :dance :dance :dance
cod
Posts: 68
Joined: 28 Jul 2007, 14:01

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by cod »

Little Joe 90 is getting spanked hilarious, but on a serious note this POS is running the company. How can we trust a word that leaves his mouth, even politicians are calling him a liar, I fear for our future if this creature is the standard of leadership in RM
bigal383
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 492
Joined: 11 Dec 2012, 16:20
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by bigal383 »

I know everyone’s excited because he looked a dik but what does that change nothing?
Be even more determined now to squash the place ….
chrisj
Posts: 1883
Joined: 21 Dec 2010, 16:24
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by chrisj »

The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?

What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.

Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.

By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3211
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Acca Dacca »

chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38
The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?

What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.

Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.

By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
A parody of yourself
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
yellowbelly
Posts: 3713
Joined: 23 Jun 2015, 15:51
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by yellowbelly »

chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38

......

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

..........
Why shouldn't the fact that the USO fails due to local managers telling staff to prioritise certain mail over others be brought up?
It's a fact in a lot of DO's around the country due to managers understaffing to achieve their bonus, increase shareholder value
and hope leftovers get done on OT. Whether they do anything about it is another matter, doesn't mean it should be swept under
the carpet and kept secret. ST obviously doesn't know what his managers are doing - that calls his credibility into account
if managers are going rogue below him and implementing their own policies contrary to RM policy.

And you think that the select committee were overly aggressive? Your threshold must be pretty low, I've seen a lot worse
from some of our so called managers. I've seen staff in tears in staff rooms because of the approach some managers take.

Bungs? I know I'm contributing to CWU and they contribute to Labour, it's in the accounts.
Your use of the word 'bung' suggests you think brown envelopes are being exchanged somewhere.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32754
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by POSTMAN »

Image
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
derricksmyth
Posts: 353
Joined: 13 Sep 2012, 17:58
Gender: Male

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by derricksmyth »

yellowbelly wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:55
chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38

......

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

..........
Why shouldn't the fact that the USO fails due to local managers telling staff to prioritise certain mail over others be brought up?
It's a fact in a lot of DO's around the country due to managers understaffing to achieve their bonus, increase shareholder value
and hope leftovers get done on OT. Whether they do anything about it is another matter, doesn't mean it should be swept under
the carpet and kept secret. ST obviously doesn't know what his managers are doing - that calls his credibility into account
if managers are going rogue below him and implementing their own policies contrary to RM policy.

And you think that the select committee were overly aggressive? Your threshold must be pretty low, I've seen a lot worse
from some of our so called managers. I've seen staff in tears in staff rooms because of the approach some managers take.

Bungs? I know I'm contributing to CWU and they contribute to Labour, it's in the accounts.
Your use of the word 'bung' suggests you think brown envelopes are being exchanged somewhere.
I agree, I have seen an awful lot worse Select Committee grillings !
Cedar_Room
Posts: 826
Joined: 31 Aug 2007, 14:09

Re: Select Committee on CWU Twitter

Post by Cedar_Room »

chrisj wrote:
17 Jan 2023, 14:38
The CWU twitter output is selective - pun!

However, I don't understand why they have to say they did not prioritise or not prioritising parcels over letters... What could the MPs or OFCOM do about it?

The select committee were overly aggressive and disrespectful but judging by the previous sitting and the committee being overly Labour or Alternative party biassed, it should be expected

On top of the fact that the CWU and the Unions are mostly pro-Labour and get bungs from Union Subs...

What will it achieve for us? More strikes and less concessions, maybe?

What exactly are the CWU fighting for now? We still do not know for sure what they have agreed and what is outstanding.

Apparently, Pay is done and dusted? And no back pay - I don't get it. A 3.5% plus £500 from last April for 18 months and then another 3% from October 2024 will have sufficed - with no loss of earnings.

By the way, we all get the £500! Because the revision will happen regardless of the Union or workers involvement - happy days, not!
You sound a little bit upset. Are you upset?
“Shorts,in this weather?!”

“If they’re bills I don’t want ‘em!”

“What’s she been ordering now?”