ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Sunak pmq's
-
KilledOff
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 70
- Joined: 29 Nov 2022, 09:40
- Gender: Male
Sunak pmq's
From another board:
An extract from PMQ's
Sunak says postal workers' pay demands unaffordable
Labour's Catherine West says Royal Mail paid record sums to shareholders last year, but is now planning to cut 10,000 jobs while threatening the future of the minimum six-days-a-week letter delivery service. Why won’t the government investigate the "mismanagement of this iconic service"?
Sunak praises the "hard work" of postal workers. But their strikes are wrong and their pay demands unaffordable, he adds.
So basically he won't investigate but says unaffordable!
An extract from PMQ's
Sunak says postal workers' pay demands unaffordable
Labour's Catherine West says Royal Mail paid record sums to shareholders last year, but is now planning to cut 10,000 jobs while threatening the future of the minimum six-days-a-week letter delivery service. Why won’t the government investigate the "mismanagement of this iconic service"?
Sunak praises the "hard work" of postal workers. But their strikes are wrong and their pay demands unaffordable, he adds.
So basically he won't investigate but says unaffordable!
-
theotherone
- Posts: 430
- Joined: 04 Jun 2020, 21:58
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
It was hilarious.
He said it was 'unaffordable' to the tax-payer.
Clearly no idea it is a private company now.
He said it was 'unaffordable' to the tax-payer.
Clearly no idea it is a private company now.
-
Kenfandango
- Posts: 694
- Joined: 19 Oct 2021, 16:40
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
He's not had a good PMQs yet has he? I think even Truss managed to have a better idea of what was going on
-
redlen
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
Hardly hilarious as Royal Mail since privatisation pays no corporation tax.
Also being a former monopoly, if Royal Mail fails to make a profit the tax payer steps into the frame and pays 10% above its operating costs.
Also being a former monopoly, if Royal Mail fails to make a profit the tax payer steps into the frame and pays 10% above its operating costs.
-
timbo1234
- Posts: 312
- Joined: 17 Jun 2015, 21:14
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
The tax payer will probably end up with the unprofitable bit of the business once it has been broken up. No matter what some people say there will always be letters and magazines. I can't even imagine the number of job losses in the publishing world if their magazines, papers, journals, periodicals etc could not be delivered. I don't think even this Tory shower would let that happen. Imagine Lord Snooty without his monthly Fox and Hounds. Absolute shower don't yer know.
-
Gasman11
- Posts: 272
- Joined: 29 Nov 2013, 14:07
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
Would Royal Mail be on course for profitability this year if it had retained the cross subsidy from GLS, been more frugal with its agency expenditure and refrained from bribing management??? 
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Sunak pmq's
I take no lectures from a fat cat tory millionaire!
-
TopperGas
- Posts: 3460
- Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
Pity somebody didn't ask Sunak what's our (CWU's) pay demands were as I haven't a clue, I sense they'd accept less than BT have just offered their workforce.
-
norris9
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
- Gender: Female
Re: Sunak pmq's
This is maybe where it's heading. It's hard to tell, but Thompson claiming 'we are a parcel business now' when we still deliver a ridiculous amount of letters, Thompson wanting tens of thousands of job losses - we won't be able to deliver the service..... is he just going to make a complete mess of the company by providing a diabolical postal service so the government take it off him and meanwhile he can have his owner-driver parcel courier....timbo1234 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2022, 13:49The tax payer will probably end up with the unprofitable bit of the business once it has been broken up. No matter what some people say there will always be letters and magazines. I can't even imagine the number of job losses in the publishing world if their magazines, papers, journals, periodicals etc could not be delivered. I don't think even this Tory shower would let that happen. Imagine Lord Snooty without his monthly Fox and Hounds. Absolute shower don't yer know.
I hope so, I hope the government take the letters service off him and then start up a parcels service too which ends up putting Thompson's International Noob deliveries company out of business.
I'll deliver the service for the public.
-
CamPostie
- Posts: 178
- Joined: 17 Jan 2022, 18:56
- Gender: Male
Re: Sunak pmq's
Thompson’s own projections pointed to a £300 million profit if changes went through - back in March / April
However, I think he was also banking on the test kit income lasting longer.
£100 million of capital expenditure (loads more to go through next reporting year) and £50 million Ofcom fine + £50 million for the management redundancies were always going to make this year tough.
Yet July’s dividend was still paid? There’s an argument to say that money should have been retained.
Last edited by CamPostie on 30 Nov 2022, 14:11, edited 1 time in total.
-
norris9
- Posts: 2681
- Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
- Gender: Female
Re: Sunak pmq's
Wow, just found the clip on twitter. Unbelievable! does he seriously think Royal Mail is publicly owned. Jesus christ!theotherone wrote: ↑30 Nov 2022, 13:27It was hilarious.
He said it was 'unaffordable' to the tax-payer.
Clearly no idea it is a private company now.
Another thing is.... he's upping the minimum wage by 10%.... but he doesn't think we should get the same. I mean I'd be happy with 8% with no significant changes.
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Sunak pmq's
Same here but they want our blood and terms and conditions gone!norris9 wrote: ↑30 Nov 2022, 14:07Wow, just found the clip on twitter. Unbelievable! does he seriously think Royal Mail is publicly owned. Jesus christ!theotherone wrote: ↑30 Nov 2022, 13:27It was hilarious.
He said it was 'unaffordable' to the tax-payer.
Clearly no idea it is a private company now.
Another thing is.... he's upping the minimum wage by 10%.... but he doesn't think we should get the same. I mean I'd be happy with 8% with no significant changes.
-
pinstripe
- Posts: 2472
- Joined: 25 May 2007, 16:42
- Gender: Male
- Location: 2 left turns from reality
Re: Sunak pmq's
What exactly are our unaffordable pay demand? What percentage are we demanding that is unaffordable?
Perhaps it is the rate of inflation that is unacceptable
-
k979aaa
- Posts: 12578
- Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
- Gender: Male
- Location: THE NORTH
Re: Sunak pmq's
Perhaps the mismanagement of the economy and it's policy ie the mini budget cause the pound to fall and they hike interest rates?
Also the fact that the big oil and gas producers have private ownership and can dictate the price we pay while avoiding tax!
Mp's pay has gone up by more than ours here: https://www.theipsa.org.uk/news/press-r ... or-2022-23
not much more but 2.7% goes along way on £82,000 a year!
-
britwrit
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 966
- Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 15:12