20221123_154327.jpg
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Shocking development
-
Bazbuz
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 11:59
Shocking development
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Bazbuz on 23 Nov 2022, 15:45, edited 1 time in total.
-
SpacePhoenix
- MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
- Posts: 12140
- Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
Time for rule 13 (think it's rule 13) local ballots?
-
Bazbuz
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 11:59
Re: Shocking development
Yes the union have announced they are now seeking a rule 13 ballot.
-
redlen
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
Obvious question
How can you ask for a Rule 13 Ballot locally whe there is a national ballot already in place with compulsory redundancies and terms and conditions??
Does not compute
How can you ask for a Rule 13 Ballot locally whe there is a national ballot already in place with compulsory redundancies and terms and conditions??
Does not compute
-
Acca Dacca
- Posts: 3211
- Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
When we balloted there was no threat/announcement of compulsory redundancies
That happened deeper into the dispute
Last edited by Acca Dacca on 23 Nov 2022, 15:36, edited 1 time in total.
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
-
redlen
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
Well ST has gone on record no -compulsory redundancies until 31 March 2023 in his last offer to the CWU
An offer the CWU has now rejected
An offer the CWU has now rejected
Last edited by redlen on 23 Nov 2022, 15:38, edited 1 time in total.
-
CRIBMAD
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 835
- Joined: 11 Oct 2016, 13:38
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
let the bullying and scare tactics commence - STAND STRONG ALL !!
-
POSTPERSON50
- Posts: 511
- Joined: 21 Oct 2021, 11:09
- Gender: Female
-
Bazbuz
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 11:59
Re: Shocking development
The question I should of asked with the original post is, has this happened any where else?
-
postman_jack
- Posts: 78
- Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 18:26
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
Seen a post on workplace Leeds MC needs a reduction of 25%
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
rambo1
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: 12 Jun 2013, 20:00
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
So, RM have said there are too many wanting VR compared to how many they want rid of, and they are talking about compulsory redundancy (still with acociated costs) ? That doesn't make sense.
-
Bazbuz
- Posts: 45
- Joined: 02 Aug 2007, 11:59
Re: Shocking development
And all the while relying on agency staff. It is mental.
-
jbo5066
- Posts: 356
- Joined: 06 Nov 2016, 14:31
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
Just my opinion - compulsory redundancies are the cake and all those wanting VR, the icing - the more that leave, the more they can replace with new fodder on inferior terms ...
-
johnny pefkos
- Posts: 2
- Joined: 22 Jan 2009, 21:22
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
149 to go in Leeds mc
-
hans solo
- Posts: 3276
- Joined: 06 Feb 2011, 18:08
- Gender: Male
Re: Shocking development
Is it legal to replace compulsory redundancies with other workers
Surely the reason for redundancies was the jobs were no longer there or viable
Take the bastards to court