ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Talks have ended - no agreement : Added RM's improved offer to 1st post

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Hyrrokkin
Posts: 847
Joined: 24 Nov 2021, 18:17
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by Hyrrokkin »

Jinder wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:26
So much for non disclosure and confidentiality blah,blah,blah. RM are the first ones out of the blocks to issue some sort of statement on the talks. The union has been outsmarted yet again by these imbeciles and they still want to carry on talking. RM have stated no more crumbs for us, so it’s time to strike now,WTF are they waiting for?
CWU over to you
Disclose everything about the talks,
We want ALL the information - not the bullshit that RM have released
norris9
Posts: 2618
Joined: 27 Feb 2019, 17:32
Gender: Female

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by norris9 »

norm wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:37
What is so attractive about a lump sum? If you took that amount in percentage terms you would get paid it every subsequent year, not just a one off.

They're fobbing you off anyway, the £1500 is just the 5% they offered as the "best and final offer" for 2022.
The £1,500 lump sum is attractive for me as I'd instantly invest it.
datasaint
Posts: 1541
Joined: 22 Sep 2008, 17:19
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by datasaint »

norris9 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:58
norm wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:37
What is so attractive about a lump sum? If you took that amount in percentage terms you would get paid it every subsequent year, not just a one off.

They're fobbing you off anyway, the £1500 is just the 5% they offered as the "best and final offer" for 2022.
The £1,500 lump sum is attractive for me as I'd instantly invest it.
And watch its value be eroded by inflation?

Lump sums are just bribes, they make us all poorer ultimately.
roadrunner bill
Posts: 399
Joined: 18 Oct 2018, 09:03
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by roadrunner bill »

the elites at royal mail are obsessed with money, power and control....... f***ing only human.... what a sad bunch they are.. they know s**t..
RTP
Posts: 863
Joined: 22 Apr 2011, 14:24
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by RTP »

It's quite pathetic that we are into early evening and still nothing has been mentioned on sick pay etc.
iHateD2Ds
Posts: 539
Joined: 16 Apr 2008, 16:33

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by iHateD2Ds »

4:30 last letter in December!
DonkeyOT
Posts: 70
Joined: 04 Mar 2023, 15:48
Gender: Female

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by DonkeyOT »

iHateD2Ds wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 18:28
4:30 last letter in December!
And if it is, then it will be my last (ever) letter.
smok3y666
Posts: 729
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 10:47
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by smok3y666 »

norris9 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:58
norm wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:37
What is so attractive about a lump sum? If you took that amount in percentage terms you would get paid it every subsequent year, not just a one off.

They're fobbing you off anyway, the £1500 is just the 5% they offered as the "best and final offer" for 2022.
The £1,500 lump sum is attractive for me as I'd instantly invest it.
£1500 less tax & NI
TopperGas
Posts: 3273
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by TopperGas »

smok3y666 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 18:37
norris9 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:58
norm wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:37
What is so attractive about a lump sum? If you took that amount in percentage terms you would get paid it every subsequent year, not just a one off.

They're fobbing you off anyway, the £1500 is just the 5% they offered as the "best and final offer" for 2022.
The £1,500 lump sum is attractive for me as I'd instantly invest it.
£1500 less tax & NI
That's also going to apply to any pay offer we get?
DonkeyOT
Posts: 70
Joined: 04 Mar 2023, 15:48
Gender: Female

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by DonkeyOT »

smok3y666 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 18:37
norris9 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:58
norm wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 17:37
What is so attractive about a lump sum? If you took that amount in percentage terms you would get paid it every subsequent year, not just a one off.

They're fobbing you off anyway, the £1500 is just the 5% they offered as the "best and final offer" for 2022.
The £1,500 lump sum is attractive for me as I'd instantly invest it.
£1500 less tax & NI
Less c£600 for the shafted 25 hour outcasts.
smok3y666
Posts: 729
Joined: 21 Dec 2008, 10:47
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by smok3y666 »

Tweet
See new Tweets
Conversation
The CWU
@CWUnews
Tomorrow at 7pm we will be live to you to let you know exactly where we are in the Royal Mail Group dispute.

You’ve trusted your union all the way through this dispute. You know we have your backs and we have yours.

Round up every single colleague.

#WeAreStillHere
marroc327
Posts: 10
Joined: 23 Oct 2022, 10:43
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by marroc327 »

:Applause
curleigh wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 10:58
Got to put this to the members..what good is striking...ARE YOU MAD !!!! the business is on its knees ffs
CamPostie
Posts: 178
Joined: 17 Jan 2022, 18:56
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by CamPostie »

That’s a bloody awful pay offer (both of them).

But what’s worse - RM would want the CWU to put both offers up to the membership knowing full well;

1.) It’d split the vote between the two offers and ‘no deal’.

2.) That a lot of members would be lured by the bigger lump sum with option B even though that’s by far the worse of the two.

At least with option A the 6% from April 2023 would apply to overtime and pension contributions etc and in theory compound the following years 2% up a bit.

I would say we should be looking for at least;

• £2,000 lump sum payable immediately
• 5% from 2023
• 5% from 2024

I know that’s not much better but it’s in the ballpark range of what RM are showing is available minus their accounting tricks.

One further point - I think the previous ‘final offer’ was potentially better because it would have forced the company to come to the table again in October.
curleigh
Posts: 22
Joined: 25 Oct 2022, 20:55
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by curleigh »

CRIBMAD wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 11:09
it will not be put to the members as no deal was agreed !
What gives them the right to reject this deal without putting to the members...we're in a democracy!!!!
curleigh
Posts: 22
Joined: 25 Oct 2022, 20:55
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by curleigh »

rambo1 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 14:14
The deal above isn't actually bad and if the CWU don't put this to vote they're probably signing our P45.
The deal on pay with the largest lump sum equates to 14% over the next two yrs or 16% if you include the 2% we have had already. With inflation set to fall to 3% by 24 it's not a million miles away from keeping up with inflation over that 3yr period.
The 500 lump sum option would equate to just over 10% so not as good as the biggest lump sum option.
Incidentally both options you end up on same basic wage after 2 yrs whichever way round you take the 2% and 6% .

No compulsory Sundays.
Existing allowances not touched.
No later starts for a year.

The Union has to put this to a vote IMHO.
💯absolutely..if not I'll be pulling my subscription