ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Talks have ended - no agreement : Added RM's improved offer to 1st post

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Grads75
Posts: 97
Joined: 07 Apr 2022, 16:25
Gender: Female

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by Grads75 »

ReturnToSenderrr wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 10:37
Talks with CWU conclude without agreement

After 11 months of talks, including mediation by Sir Brendan Barber and Acas, we are deeply concerned that our talks with CWU have concluded without an agreement.

Where did we get to in the talks?

We thought we were making progress. The CWU seemed to understand the serious financial situation we are in.

They seemed to recognise that change is needed. We understood that agreement was within touching distance, and we were hopeful that the CWU would finally put a deal to its members.

We made substantial efforts to reach an agreement, including making a number of further improvements to our offer. These improvements were all based on feedback from the CWU.

As we continued talks late into last night, whilst we had made progress on a number of issues, the main sticking point was new contracts for new starters.

These contracts were introduced last year, and we had offered to level up over five years. The CWU did not accept this proposal.
The offer

Some of the improvements we made in the recent talks include:
Pay - We increased our pay offer, and extended the offer until April 2025. We offered two options to the CWU:
o Option A: 10% three year pay deal, plus £500
- 2% pay rise from April 2022 (already paid), 6% from April 2023 plus a lump sum of £500, 2% from April 2024
o Option B: 10% three year pay deal, plus £1,500
- 2% pay rise from April 2022 (already paid), 2% from April 2023 plus a lump sum of £1,500, 6% from April 2024
- Plus achieving pay parity for new starters over a five year period

Allowances – We said that all allowances would remain for existing employees
Profit share – We proposed a significant profit share arrangement for employees, so that we all benefit when we get Royal Mail back to profitability
Later start times – We amended our proposal so that start times in delivery offices would move 60 minutes – 90 minutes later (instead of our original proposal of up to three hours for everyone), with a last letter delivery time of 4.30pm. We also said that no start time changes would happen until March 2024, to give everyone time to adjust
An independent review of conduct cases led by a senior lawyer

These improvements are designed to reduce the impact on you, whilst ensuring the business can transform and survive. This builds on other improvements we have made earlier in the talks, including:

Job security - Commitment to no Compulsory Redundancy for the life of the agreement
Sunday working – Remains voluntary and we keep the Sunday Premium for existing employees

Where do we go from here?

In the end, the CWU were unable to agree to the change needed to ensure the future of this company.
There is nothing left to give.
We urge the CWU to agree the deal, and put it to a vote.
That is in the best interests of Royal Mail, our customers and all our employees.

Simon Thompson
Chief Executive Officer

Zareena Brown
Chief People Officer

Ricky McAulay
Operations Development Director
Announce strikes if still no movement go ahead with strikes it's gone beyond pay now anyway it's been more about rm lack of respect for employees terms and conditions if it goes bust it goes bust statutory redundancy pay
Splappy_McSplap
Posts: 226
Joined: 02 Sep 2009, 13:55
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by Splappy_McSplap »

koolishy67 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 15:38
Option B please
Doesn't that work out at £500 less?
claystones
Posts: 329
Joined: 02 Mar 2010, 23:34
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by claystones »

where are they finding this money all of a sudden they didnt have any last week cant believe a word they say
redlen
Posts: 1331
Joined: 21 Dec 2021, 12:05
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by redlen »

Royal Mail have previously stated they have funding in place on acceptance of the agreement
Kenfandango
Posts: 690
Joined: 19 Oct 2021, 16:40
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by Kenfandango »

Didn't the CWU tell us about a week ago that all the cries of "but they're doing it already" are false, and they alone have been holding back the tide?
Now RM are openly saying they have already implemented the new contracts for new starters last year, which makes the union look like they either A) lied about how much they've stopped or B) never gave a hoot about new starters in the first place....
redrobbo
Posts: 48
Joined: 13 Jul 2009, 05:52
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by redrobbo »

I'd like to know what exactly did the cwu propose maybe these terms offered by RM should be put to the members and then we can vote yes or no , in our office we already start at 7.30, 8.00 on Tues it used to be 5 but the union agreed to later start times with RM I'd like to know what times other offices start the changes to sick pay I agree with there's far too many glass backs milking it I definitely don't agree with annualised hours option B the better of a shite offer we deserve more but if RM are in financial trouble maybe that's the best deal we can get Sunday working stays voluntary
parforthewalk
Posts: 149
Joined: 10 Feb 2013, 17:23
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by parforthewalk »

redlen wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 15:59
Royal Mail have previously stated they have funding in place on acceptance of the agreement
But where is the money coming from?

I do agree with the suggestion that it's put to the 'membership' to vote either yay or nay, with the union not endorsing it.

For what It's worth, on what I've read & seen re the 'deal' to quote the line in 'dragons den' I'm out! :wave
needadvice
MDEC
Posts: 244
Joined: 20 Jun 2012, 23:39
Gender: Female

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by needadvice »

rubberbond wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 14:59
fredtheegg wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 14:13
cockneyrebel wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 13:48
Guys all of you quoting £1,500 and £500 it wont be
Those 2 amouts will be subject to 20% tax
Its same as Christmas bonus and other lump sums offered to striking workers
All lump sums subject to tax
It’s basically £1200 after taking of 20% tax
You forgot to deduct National Insurance, which is effectively just another income tax, can’t remember what the rate is.
14% nat insurance. 20% tax. So basically it's a grand for full timers
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by guardianangel »

77SAMPOST77 wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 10:50
Not good enough ,
minimum week long strikes required .
DO NOT DO 1 OR 2 DAY STRIKES THEY ARE POINTLESS .
DO NOT DO SATURDAY STRIKES THEY ARE ALSO POINTLESS .
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by guardianangel »

hans solo wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 10:44
Pay offer shite
Get the strike dates up now CWU
No more f***ing about
2% already imposed .£500 lump sum and 6% for next year
That’s a massive pay cut in real terms
Forget about 2024 we will be carved up by then
:Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1235
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

Wasn’t the “best and final offer” 9% over 2 years. Now it’s 10% over 3 :no no
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by guardianangel »

We had a massive yes vote for strikes ,nothing has changed call them now,its not our fault they nicked all the money,ricky simon and zareena do the right thing resign you will never move this company forward without the workforce ,ALL OUT !!!
guardianangel
Posts: 1782
Joined: 21 Feb 2020, 19:40
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by guardianangel »

Clappedoutpostie wrote:
05 Apr 2023, 16:27
Wasn’t the “best and final offer” 9% over 2 years. Now it’s 10% over 3 :no no
Exactly its worse ,strike now and start preparing for another ballot to carry it on towards xmas.
pieoftheday
Posts: 1829
Joined: 11 Mar 2010, 16:43
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by pieoftheday »

Who the hell would trust a letter with the CEO's name to it?
miles_peters
Posts: 295
Joined: 19 Jul 2014, 12:29
Gender: Male

Re: Talks have ended - no agreement

Post by miles_peters »

its a scam and very scary for us all if that offer as it is gets through