“1st class ,all parcels, all tracked and all specials will be delivered every day Monday to Saturday” - they certainly will on singleton duties, as will everything as there is not a plan for these types on duties.Martin Walsh wrote: ↑22 Feb 2025, 07:391st class ,all parcels, all tracked and all specials will be delivered every day Monday to Saturday.
Non priority will be delivered every other day Monday to Friday.
If you do double prep then this will be removed from your duty along with other indoor tasks and given to a part timer to increase their hours up to full time.
Mondays and Tuesdays will be heavier then now so long and short attendances will no longer will be required.
The model does not work with absorption.
The call rate increases from 48-% to the high 70’s.
The work which will increase will be mainly walk sorted / sequenced items.
Each of the improved attendance patterns will in exchange for more days off work slightly lengthen the days your at work.
The true degree of the impact will need to be tested in the pilots.
“Non priority will be delivered every other day Monday to Friday” - singleton duties will be delivering these items every day. Paired duties will not be delivering them every other day. Statements like this are false and destroy our confidence in the process.
“If you do double prep then this will be removed from your duty along with other indoor tasks and given to a part timer to increase their hours up to full time” - other than a possible increase in contract hours there is zero benefit for workers. One possible outcome is that both workers will spend longer outdoors on duties that cannot be completed now. Without a greater explanation you are simply inflaming the anger members feel.
“Mondays and Tuesdays will be heavier then now so long and short attendances will no longer will be required” - this implies that every day will be of equal length. The variation in shift lengths does not only affect Monday and Tuesday. Some members have a variation in shift lengths every day. Workers do not believe what you are saying.
“The model does not work with absorption” - workers have been told that absorption or lapsing doesn’t exist anymore. Everything is now workload. Of course the experiment does not work with absorption but neither does it address duties that cannot be completed.
“The call rate increases from 48-% to the high 70’s” - you need to be specific here Martin because you are referring to a specific experiment. This call rate does not reflect the workload of singleton duties or the combined duties delivered by one worker.
“The work which will increase will be mainly walk sorted / sequenced items” - this is a very specific type of work, letters. It does not mean all the work will be walk sorted or sequenced.
“Each of the improved attendance patterns will in exchange for more days off work slightly lengthen the days your at work” - condensing the working time by lengthening the duty span, resulting in additional time off, is no recompense for longer duties. This also severely limits the duty span options.
“The true degree of the impact will need to be tested in the pilots” - the impact of the regulators demands can be simulated on paper Martin. The CWU keeps on boasting about local reps already modelling the attendance patterns even though they are not part of the experiment. Members already know the impact of the CWU’s plans and it is not what they want.