ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Pay talks 2022 discussion, news, LTB's RMCtv and all BUSINESS RECOVERY, TRANSFORMATION AND GROWTH AGREEMENT chat
Clappedoutpostie
Posts: 1232
Joined: 05 Nov 2021, 21:46
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by Clappedoutpostie »

k979aaa wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 16:06
Working to rule will require a ballot never say this to a manager you could be sacked for it just saying it say instead" I will perform to the standards and regulations of the terms I am employed by in my contract."
I believe you can have a vote locally to work to rule if you follow the correct procedure. The CWU should have also put this on the ballot paper nationally.
Dogbone1510
Posts: 47
Joined: 30 Aug 2018, 08:31
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by Dogbone1510 »

I got done by Simon and his cronies as had 1 week holiday then caught covid so now have missed out on 4 weeks holiday about 600 I contacted hi. On workplace and he is basically hiding behind the wording of the policy no legal at all I usually work.about 6 hrs a week.
so when it gets busy I'm finishing on my time I advise all.others to do the same but they won't.
k979aaa
Posts: 12578
Joined: 03 Sep 2007, 19:14
Gender: Male
Location: THE NORTH

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by k979aaa »

Clappedoutpostie wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 17:25
k979aaa wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 16:06
Working to rule will require a ballot never say this to a manager you could be sacked for it just saying it say instead" I will perform to the standards and regulations of the terms I am employed by in my contract."
I believe you can have a vote locally to work to rule if you follow the correct procedure. The CWU should have also put this on the ballot paper nationally.
How would that work? As every ballot paper is non traceable nor office defined!
postieblueshirt
Posts: 1241
Joined: 01 Oct 2019, 22:05
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by postieblueshirt »

postslippete wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 17:23
postieblueshirt wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 14:15
i agree lets face it the cost of living as it is there strategy will be to starve us out and they will win in the end,theres no attempt whatsoever to stop this strike.rm it seems couldnt care less.

Simon has a very good pokerface and Royal Mail are bluffing right now so that they can get the best possible deal. As a veteran of previous strikes, this is exactly what Royal Mail do. They propose all sorts of demands that they know won't get accepted in the vain hope that they can make a few stick and offer us a measly pay increase in return. So its really a case of the lesser of the two evils - either they need to reduce or get rid of some of their proposals or offer more money to postal workers.

There is a lot of FUD right now. Royal Mail can introduce agency workers, they can say that they have a plan to deal with the strikes, that letters will suddenly be delivered 3 days a week because Royal Mail only paid £400 million to shareholders and recorded a £311 million profit last year. But now all of a sudden the company is losing £1 million a day and will go bankrupt and we will all lose our jobs etc etc etc. Royal Mail is awash with cash - don't let anybody tell you any different!! Unlike many other companies that really suffered during the pandemic, Royal Mail didn't and it has always had a very healthy balance sheet.

It is in Royal Mail's interests to reach an AGREEMENT. Because while they try and 'starve us out' as you call it, the company will lose business, the shareholders lose confidence and unfortunately when that happens it usually ends with the resignation or sacking of Simon Thompson. Perhaps he knows this and thats why he's already pocketed his bonus while he's had the chance. Maybe he will also scoop up thousands of pounds worth of cheap shares if they get any lower like Rico Back did!
Appreciate the reply I've been out on every strike since 1995 do you not get the feeling this one is a bit different.pokerface or not I think they couldn't give a f@ck at the moment they want a trial run at agency delivering there strategy.hope I'm wrong but this feels different.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Clappedoutpostie wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 17:25
k979aaa wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 16:06
Working to rule will require a ballot never say this to a manager you could be sacked for it just saying it say instead" I will perform to the standards and regulations of the terms I am employed by in my contract."
I believe you can have a vote locally to work to rule if you follow the correct procedure. The CWU should have also put this on the ballot paper nationally.
You would need your branch to authorise a rule 13 ballot.
At the moment that's highly unlikely.
To be honest what's being described on here would not be a work to rule but an overtime ban.
A work to rule is completely different and pretty complicated to organise and supervise.
Only dead fish follow the current
Rapido123
Posts: 34
Joined: 04 Mar 2022, 13:25
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by Rapido123 »

We did this when they brought in shared vans, we did it off our own backs as we thought delivery’s were to big.In on time, had our break, used trolleys and returned to office on time unable to complete.Duties were then reduced in size, as I remember we stood together. This was done without union involvement, we were doing the job properly not working to rule.
redrobbo
Posts: 48
Joined: 13 Jul 2009, 05:52
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by redrobbo »

Same is happening in my office postie's running round their delivery working through breaks not booking overtime coming in before start time then moaning cos they have to lapse unless we all start doing the job properly we'll never hit rm where it hurts
twoloops
Posts: 1960
Joined: 24 May 2017, 20:52
Gender: Male
Location: Sheffield

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by twoloops »

All big companies employ a small amount of fruit loops & retards, without them companies like RM would not exist, look around your office I can guarantee you can roll those names off your tongue without thinking to hard, they usually work in the callers office on a Sunday, take their empty bags home, work their day off, have like 40/50 days holiday owning them from years ago, been here since school, sadly that’s what we are dealing with, posties that feel honoured to work for RM.
Wolf91
Posts: 506
Joined: 06 Sep 2018, 17:22
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by Wolf91 »

twoloops wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 19:56
All big companies employ a small amount of fruit loops & retards, without them companies like RM would not exist, look around your office I can guarantee you can roll those names off your tongue without thinking to hard, they usually work in the callers office on a Sunday, take their empty bags home, work their day off, have like 40/50 days holiday owning them from years ago, been here since school, sadly that’s what we are dealing with, posties that feel honoured to work for RM.
Saddos we call them - and yes we have a few :thumbup
SpacePhoenix
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 11878
Joined: 12 Nov 2008, 17:03
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by SpacePhoenix »

Rapido123 wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 19:16
We did this when they brought in shared vans, we did it off our own backs as we thought delivery’s were to big.In on time, had our break, used trolleys and returned to office on time unable to complete.Duties were then reduced in size, as I remember we stood together. This was done without union involvement, we were doing the job properly not working to rule.
Trouble is these days "doing the job properly" by most of an office is likely to be construed by RM as being unofficial industrial action unless it has been balloted for
jessicarabbit
Posts: 605
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
Gender: Female

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by jessicarabbit »

How can taking your breaks and using the designated equipment and not working past your finishing time be considered unofficial industrial action? I personally have been doing this for years but the whole reason this never catches on is because every individual has different circumstances and feels like they can't turn down ot for fear of not getting a permanent contract or coming in early as they feel they need to finish on time to hide their own inefficiency or just want a bit of extra money or time to themselves. It's the reason we don't ever do work to rule.
postslippete
Posts: 4031
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by postslippete »

Woody Guthrie wrote:
14 Aug 2022, 18:39
A work to rule is completely different and pretty complicated to organise and supervise.

Just as well the managers didn't go through with that one then :chuckle
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by Woody Guthrie »

How can taking your breaks and using the designated equipment and not working past your finishing time be considered unofficial industrial action?
Pretty much anything that looks like it is organised and not spontaneous and individual choice can be considered as industrial action.

It's only really an issue if the union is implicated.

Wildcat industrial action still happens though it used to be more common but you have to be careful because the legal protection isn't as solid.
Only dead fish follow the current
jessicarabbit
Posts: 605
Joined: 05 Nov 2009, 19:57
Gender: Female

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by jessicarabbit »

I don't presume to know everyone's personal circumstances. The do your job poster and the working for free stops 10 people getting made full time in your office poster are still on the notice board upstairs in the canteen where no one goes now because they all skip their breaks before going on delivery. It's as much about personal pride for me. I don't know what the answer is....I just need to get a decent IHR package when my feet finally give up and then I'm afraid it's every man for themselves. This dispute feels different and more scary than the others I've had the privilege of taking part in.
tmac
Posts: 163
Joined: 15 Jan 2009, 15:25
Gender: Male

Re: Why we might have to work to rule in the longer term

Post by tmac »

We have the runners in our place , come in early run around don't take there meal relief. They are all guys in there 30/40 . I don't think they will have a job to go to if they keep on.