Letter to Branches
No. 892/2011
Ref: LR/FH/DGN
Date: 25th October 2011
To: All Branches
Dear Colleague
Harassment in the Workplace
The CWU cannot stress enough the importance of being able to continue to demonstrate in a constructive manner to members that we take harassment issues in the workplace very seriously. The CWU maintains its zero tolerance position on Bullying and Harassment.
Our CWU harassment and bullying helpline, is available 24 hours a day 7 days a week. There is also an HCD1 form, which were both introduced as a result of the joint EOC/CWU framework agreement.
It is vitally important that Branch Secretaries maintain a proactive stance which will enable CWU headquarters to monitor patterns vis-à-vis bullying and harassment. Where this has been done before we have been able to liaise with the Postal or Telecom departments with a view to an appropriate NEC person being allocated into that region to investigate any claims.
Just to act as a reminder the 24-hour helpline number is 0800 107 1909.
A blank copy of the HCD1 form is also attached with this LTB for your use and we would recommend you save this electronically or copies are made as appropriate.
Any enquiries please address to the Equal Opportunities Department.
Yours sincerely,
Linda Roy
Assistant Secretary
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72478
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
steven100
- Posts: 1391
- Joined: 09 Aug 2009, 12:35
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
The article should read LTB 982/2011 Managers harrassing employees in the Workplace.
-
General Mannerheim
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: 14 Dec 2007, 13:10
- Gender: Male
- Location: Stalag 17
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
Yeah they take it VERY seriously

Royal Mail managers.....about as popular as a t.urd in a swimming pool!
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
The DDA/Equality Act demands action,NOT words......adjustments NOT Occupational Health referrals.Case No:2505901/09
Royal Mail is an Equal Opportunities Employer..It discriminates against everybody.
-
paranoid-android
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 24 Feb 2010, 09:17
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
steven100 wrote:The article should read LTB 982/2011 Managers harrassing employees in the Workplace.
-
Lincox
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
Has anyone successfully lodged a claim of B&H against a Manager?
-
boogyman
- Posts: 161
- Joined: 17 Mar 2011, 17:29
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
I PUT ONE IN MONTHS AGO AND STILL NOTHING DONE ABOUT IT! THEY MUST ALL PISS IN THE SAME POT! ( ANGRY POSTIE!)Lincox wrote:Has anyone successfully lodged a claim of B&H against a Manager?
-
brothermagrew
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: Shares a border with England to the south.
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
It is essential that all branches log all harassment complaints made to them so that these can be recorded into the CWU National Harassment Complaints Database. Did you for instance complete the (HCD)1 form? Have you made further inquiries as to whether your branch has duly logged your complaint? For more information contact the Equal Opportunities Department on 0208 971 7238 or Linda Roy, Assistant Secretary for the department and Equality Officer.boogyman wrote:I PUT ONE IN MONTHS AGO AND STILL NOTHING DONE ABOUT IT! THEY MUST ALL PISS IN THE SAME POT! ( ANGRY POSTIE!)Lincox wrote:Has anyone successfully lodged a claim of B&H against a Manager?
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
-
Lincox
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
From what I gather BrotherM most B&H Claims against managers are being thrown out by HR and converted to Grievance Claims. Apparently this does not have such an impact on the company in terms of how it looks as a business and the way it treats it,s staff.
-
brothermagrew
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 16:38
- Gender: Male
- Location: Shares a border with England to the south.
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
Appreciate your insight into this matter Lincox and thanks for enlightening me. Any thoughts to the CWU National response if any to this issue? As to the way it treats it's staff I take it that you have fully familiarised yourself with LTB 869/11 and in particular:
Eventually, the intention is to directly link 25% of managers' bonuses to what the staff say about how they are treated.
Eventually, the intention is to directly link 25% of managers' bonuses to what the staff say about how they are treated.
"Today’s workplace has become heartless and soulless. Employees are seen as units of labour, automatons, functionaries, objects for achieving designated tasks, and as costs to be minimised."
-
Lincox
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 3485
- Joined: 09 Jan 2008, 18:07
- Gender: Male
Re: LTB 892/2011 Harassment in the Workplace
Well BM it seems that unless a manager has been witnessed using foul language at you or attacks you physically, then anything else is down to procedural issues. ie Grievance, even though the actions of these managers in blatantly missusing/ misinterpreting the 2007/2010 Agreements and other company procedures against individuals is a form of victimisation/harrassment.
Any form of poll whether it,s Mori or anyone else is only as good as the questions that are asked and the way they are asked, so I do not see how this will improve relationships with cwu members, as managers will continue to use bullying tactics against individuals who do not or cannot stand up to them.
As for 25% of bonuses being based on how staff say they are treated. What a non starter. Sounds like this is a way for Royal Mail to cut Managers Bonuses. (Not that I am against this) but so open to abuse on both sides. CWU should be insisting on a code of conduct for managers. All complaints against a manager to be scrutinised by CWU Area Rep and Upper Line Manager to determine whether this is a Grievance Case or B&H before submitting. If there are any acts of intimidation, victimisation then this should automatically be considered as harrasment case.
Any form of poll whether it,s Mori or anyone else is only as good as the questions that are asked and the way they are asked, so I do not see how this will improve relationships with cwu members, as managers will continue to use bullying tactics against individuals who do not or cannot stand up to them.
As for 25% of bonuses being based on how staff say they are treated. What a non starter. Sounds like this is a way for Royal Mail to cut Managers Bonuses. (Not that I am against this) but so open to abuse on both sides. CWU should be insisting on a code of conduct for managers. All complaints against a manager to be scrutinised by CWU Area Rep and Upper Line Manager to determine whether this is a Grievance Case or B&H before submitting. If there are any acts of intimidation, victimisation then this should automatically be considered as harrasment case.