LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
No. 152/17
13th March 2017
Dear Colleagues,
Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
Branches and Representatives are advised that the union has been approached by the business regarding a proposed trial of a new recruitment process in partnership with the Manpower Employment Agency, primarily for the delivery function.
Listed below are the proposed locations and a summary of the trial, inclusive of the terms and conditions that will apply.
A trial in three geographies:
East - Redhill, Derby, Ipswich, North West London
West- South Coast East - Warrington, Wolverhampton
North – North West Scotland, Sheffield North, Darlington, Durham
New recruits will be sourced from the Manpower Employment Agency instead of being directly recruited by Royal Mail.
These new recruits will be paid by the agency for the first 8-12 weeks, at a rate believed to be minimum wage, although when directly asked the actual pay rate the response was not clear.
There will be a review of the individual by the DOM in the Delivery Office at the 8 week stage from commencement of employment to establish whether “either party” wishes to continue employment.
The potential for full Royal Mail pay terms and conditions at the 12 week stage, along with a substantive contract of employment.
The CWU view this trial as wholly unacceptable and believe that not only is it in direct conflict with our agreements but is an affront to decent employment terms and conditions for working people.
In essence we believe that this trial is an attempt by the company to cover up its completely inadequate recruitment processes currently in place, rather than ensure that they are fit for purpose. It is also our considered opinion that this is a direct attempt to save money and circumnavigate the principles of recruiting new entrants to the business in line with our agreements.
It should also be noted that this proposed trial is and remains un-agreed with the CWU and that any attempt by the business to apply this un-agreed method of recruitment should be challenged by local Representatives, with immediate action sought to maintain the status quo in line with the terms of the national IR Framework Agreement and brought to the urgent attention of the appropriate National Officer
It is therefore essential that this LTB is discussed with local Representatives (especially in the trial sites named above) and they are advised to go to immediate disagreement insisting that the vacancies are recruited directly on Royal Mail contracts and RM terms and conditions. Equally they should demand that the status quo (in respect of not using this new Manpower approach) is maintained until the disagreement has been dealt with.
Any attempt by the business to ignore the terms of the IR Framework will be deemed as executive action and the appropriate action taken by all means necessary to defend our National Agreements.
The CWU believe that this un-agreed initiative is in conflict with our legally binding agreements and we will be considering our next steps in regards to the legal status of the trial should the business deploy via executive action.
Any enquiries in relation to this LTB should be addressed to the DGS(P) Department quoting reference 24000.
Yours sincerely
Terry Pullinger
Deputy General Secretary (Postal)
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72658
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
worktotime
- Posts: 2862
- Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
- Gender: Male
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
if its against the cwu agreement why allow it at all ? 
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72658
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
worktotime wrote:if its against the cwu agreement why allow it at all ?
They aren't. If the CWU don't agree they go to disagreement, its the process.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
Slippery slope this particular issue,who knows where it will lead. Needs stopping before it starts.
This much trumpeted legally binding thing,is about as worthless as the binding itself.
This much trumpeted legally binding thing,is about as worthless as the binding itself.
-
slinder123
- Posts: 261
- Joined: 25 Oct 2014, 14:44
- Gender: Female
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
and its not just that cwu know the agreements up and down the country have for a long time been s**t on and done nothing about it they have had loads of reports but put it back to local reps because they cant make a stand no wonder the membership is frittering away i just wish we had a bob crow bless him he had the guts to stand up for his men not let them be s**t on from great heights day in day out 
-
jetblack
- Posts: 974
- Joined: 15 Apr 2011, 12:54
- Gender: Male
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
I'm liking this Terry Pullinger bloke. He's spot on again - though of course I realise he's not acting alone.
Stop this RM proposal now - or welcome to our future.
Stop this RM proposal now - or welcome to our future.
Good security means trying to limit the damage a Trusted role can do
-
worktotime
- Posts: 2862
- Joined: 14 May 2010, 20:47
- Gender: Male
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
why put it on then ? and leave it to local reps to deal with and put it in the waste of time ir framework ,why cant the powers above just go to disagreement no argument .TrueBlueTerrier wrote:worktotime wrote:if its against the cwu agreement why allow it at all ?
They aren't. If the CWU don't agree they go to disagreement, its the process.
-
rubberbond
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: 24 Aug 2014, 16:03
- Gender: Male
LTB 152/17 - Royal Mail and Manpower Recruitment Trial
I notice that the trials aren't taking place in areas of high employment/problematic recruitment areas, Surrey,etc. Funny that, wonder why not.