worktotime wrote:to be honest who cares and what difference does it make what they bring in , clocking in and out etc or how there expect you to work as you still have a start and finish time regardless ,
I would rather not start my delivery at my start time and finish it at my finish time.
What's really at stake here is the indoor workload and what that will mean to the outdoor workload.
worktotime wrote:to be honest who cares and what difference does it make what they bring in , clocking in and out etc or how there expect you to work as you still have a start and finish time regardless ,
I would rather not start my delivery at my start time and finish it at my finish time.
What's really at stake here is the indoor workload and what that will mean to the outdoor workload.
It's fairly tied in with MCs as to do that they'd need to automate a lot of what currently gets done manually in MCs
worktotime wrote:to be honest who cares and what difference does it make what they bring in , clocking in and out etc or how there expect you to work as you still have a start and finish time regardless ,
I would rather not start my delivery at my start time and finish it at my finish time.
What's really at stake here is the indoor workload and what that will mean to the outdoor workload.
It's fairly tied in with MCs as to do that they'd need to automate a lot of what currently gets done manually in MCs
And if it does eventually become automated then a lot of MC jobs are gone.
worktotime wrote:to be honest who cares and what difference does it make what they bring in , clocking in and out etc or how there expect you to work as you still have a start and finish time regardless ,
I would rather not start my delivery at my start time and finish it at my finish time.
What's really at stake here is the indoor workload and what that will mean to the outdoor workload.
It's fairly tied in with MCs as to do that they'd need to automate a lot of what currently gets done manually in MCs
And if it does eventually become automated then a lot of MC jobs are gone.
Can't see them ever automating it all, there's not enough flats any-more to really be able to justify sorting them on a machine.
clashcityrocker wrote:Where are the " the trials have been stopped because they don't work" brigade?
This LTB isn't going to be a contender for a clear English award is it!! Very hard to determine what the CWU is trying to say here. I think RM are really desperate in search of any cost savings still but they are barking up the wrong tree on this one.
The views I express here are mine alone and do not represent the views of Royal Mail Group.
It is very clear......after the initial trials completed further trials were needed to evaluate further new methods developed using the data from the first trials. These second trials have now concluded and the Union and RMG are now in the process of evaluating this new data with the results and conclusions to be broadcast to us all later.