ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Structural vs table top revisions

Latest news, comm's, LTB'S, and discussion on 'The pathway to change'.
postmanzach
Posts: 505
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 15:01
Gender: Male

Structural vs table top revisions

Post by postmanzach »

Why do some offices get selected for structural revisions and not table top?

With the table top revisions it’s being based upon the weighted items per work hour, but I haven’t heard this mentioned once with our structural revision, and when I have requested to see the figures they said they haven’t got them yet. Perhaps will see them today and I can stop thinking something strange is going on!

How accurate and agreed upon is geo route?
postmanzach
Posts: 505
Joined: 18 Jul 2011, 15:01
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by postmanzach »

Also I had no idea about geo route until this started. I been telling people don’t rush around because of pda actuals you will end up with a bigger round, but now it seems that’s bollocks. We looked at some rounds close to 6 hours on the geo route but the postie is a “runner” gets it done closer to 4- 4.5, the manager has said it’s fine to leave it he is simply fast.
Marshamp11
Posts: 437
Joined: 06 Aug 2018, 16:38
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Marshamp11 »

postmanzach wrote:
25 Mar 2021, 05:54
Also I had no idea about geo route until this started. I been telling people don’t rush around because of pda actuals you will end up with a bigger round, but now it seems that’s bollocks. We looked at some rounds close to 6 hours on the geo route but the postie is a “runner” gets it done closer to 4- 4.5, the manager has said it’s fine to leave it he is simply fast.
So what happens if there is a repick and the runner doesn't get or want it. Just accuse the OPG who ends up on it that they are to slow I suppose.
citypostie
Posts: 884
Joined: 08 Apr 2009, 19:42
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by citypostie »

Marshamp11 wrote:
07 Apr 2021, 18:57
postmanzach wrote:
25 Mar 2021, 05:54
Also I had no idea about geo route until this started. I been telling people don’t rush around because of pda actuals you will end up with a bigger round, but now it seems that’s bollocks. We looked at some rounds close to 6 hours on the geo route but the postie is a “runner” gets it done closer to 4- 4.5, the manager has said it’s fine to leave it he is simply fast.
So what happens if there is a repick and the runner doesn't get or want it. Just accuse the OPG who ends up on it that they are to slow I suppose.
That's exactly what would happen because geo route says it's doable using all the data and average pace they put into it
shayanboon
Posts: 58
Joined: 26 Feb 2012, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by shayanboon »

Have had a third party group session with "troubleshooter" asked if geo route being used not this year. :hmmmm
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4234
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Martin Walsh »

Every Office will have a structural revision within the next 3 years.

For now the plan is a maximin of 400 offices will have a structural revision where your indoor will be based on IWT and your outdoor will be based on geo route. This will be then calculated to WIPWH and will determine your year 2 and 3 reviews/ revisions.

For the other 886 Delivery Offices they will do a table top revision using WIPWH depending on the category they were in at 27-30 2019. This is then updated by the traffic of 2020.
shayanboon
Posts: 58
Joined: 26 Feb 2012, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by shayanboon »

Thanks for the reply, obviously we are still not singing from the same hymn sheet as this third party seemed pretty certain this was further along the three year process also not quite sure the Rep is following the prescribed method of revision in assessing PDA OA in conjunction with the DOM.
Or are we not meant to be aware of PDA usage.
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4234
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Martin Walsh »

PDA OA is not a revision tool. Either for a table top or structural revision.

All revisions are in year 1 of a 3 year flight path.

The only need for looking at the PDA OA is if the geo route says this block of flats or a street takes you an hour and you believe it takes 90 mins the PDA OA can verify that.
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3167
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Acca Dacca »

What does a tabletop revision entail compared to a structural? Does tabletop trigger an office resign?
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Martin Walsh
Posts: 4234
Joined: 19 Sep 2007, 20:12
Location: neverland

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Martin Walsh »

The difference is that the table top revisions give each office a target revision hours after their productivity improvement. In the vast majority of offices there is not going to be significant change so in the majority of offices there will not need to be a full resign as the criteria for resign under the way forward would not have been triggered.

For example out of 886 offices due a table top

304 offices have more work hours in their revision hours after their productivity improvement than they did in 2019.

299 offices have between 1 hour and 50 hours less than in 2019 after their productivity improvement.

9 offices have the same hourage after their productivity improvement.

154 offices have between 51 hours to 100 hours less than in 2019 after their productivity improvement.

The remainder are the bigger units with over 4000 hours in and those offices who have seen less traffic in 2020 than in 2019 due to inner city businesses having to work from home , or have airports which have largely closed , or have universities which have seen a decline in Mail. We have agreed a resolution for those offices within the agreement.
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3167
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Acca Dacca »

Appreciate the reply Martin thank you
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
shayanboon
Posts: 58
Joined: 26 Feb 2012, 21:43
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by shayanboon »

Thanks again, getting mixed messages in regards Geo Route and use of.
PDA OA, with seen documentation for the DOM, it is their responsibility to review all walks and to implement improvements to those regularly going over and source more work for those regularly going under hours. As submitted on other posts this is with the minimum of disturbance.
Grumpyoldmailman
Posts: 810
Joined: 24 Nov 2019, 22:29
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Grumpyoldmailman »

What happens if the headcount needed after the revision is less than the current headcount?
Cucumber
Posts: 1052
Joined: 09 Dec 2018, 10:24
Gender: Female

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Cucumber »

Grumpyoldmailman wrote:
27 Apr 2021, 23:01
What happens if the headcount needed after the revision is less than the current headcount?
A question I would like to know the answer to also. Offices are currently being run on overtime, even without covid reasons.
Any member of staff that have left ours in the past 5-6 years has caused no increase in contracted hours for the rest. Plenty of full time staff have left, not one part time member given a FT contract.
Planning a revision on 'Joe likes a bit of overtime' simply shouldn't be happening in my view.
Woody Guthrie
Posts: 5166
Joined: 29 Sep 2018, 20:47
Gender: Male

Re: Structural vs table top revisions

Post by Woody Guthrie »

Just like any revision the MTSF comes into play if there are surplus hours.
How likely that is will depend on how well staffed your office is going into the revision.
Only dead fish follow the current