http://www.cityam.com/289029/influentia ... royal-mail" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Two influential shareholder advisory groups have advised investors to oppose the new Royal Mail chief executive’s pay which they describe as excessive.
Long-serving chief executive Moya Greene is standing down to be replaced by Rico Back, head of Royal Mail subsidiary GLS.
Shareholder adviser group Glass Lewis recommended investors oppose Royal Mail's remuneration report because the base salary of incoming boss Back is 16.8 per cent higher than Greene’s.
Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) also criticises Back’s salary and also attacks Greene’s “excessive” termination payments.
A Royal Mail spokesperson said: “We have sought to ensure that Rico Back and Moya Greene’s overall fixed cash remuneration – their base salary, pension entitlements and benefits – are broadly the same. So, Rico Back’s annual salary is higher than Moya Greene’s to compensate for the halving of the cash pension allowance he would have received were this the same as the pension allowance Moya Greene received.”
Glass Lewis said that it tended to view high fixed pay levels “with skepticism”.
“We believe shareholders should question the appropriateness of the increase. In particular, we note that an increase to base salary has a compounding effect on the amount of short- and long-term incentives granted to an executive, since such awards are often granted as a fixed percentage of base salary,” they said.
Royal Mail said: “It is worth noting that the potential increase in Rico Back’s variable pay is subject to meeting stringent performance conditions. The remuneration committee has committed to ensure that the performance conditions are suitably challenging. In the event that this extra pay is awarded, significant shareholder value would have been created.”
Royal Mail said Greene’s termination payments were fixed from the period when it was still under public ownership.
Royal Mail was floated in 2013 in what was the biggest UK privatisation since the 1980s.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Influential shareholder advisory groups oppose Royal Mail boss's pay packet
-
TrueBlueTerrier
- FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
- Posts: 72658
- Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
- Gender: Male
- Location: On my couch
Influential shareholder advisory groups oppose Royal Mail boss's pay packet
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
-
Celgar
- Posts: 2795
- Joined: 01 Nov 2017, 17:11
- Gender: Male
Influential shareholder advisory groups oppose Royal Mail boss's pay packet
RM - "stringent performance conditions" = caning the **** out of the workforce.
The views I express here are mine alone and do not represent the views of Royal Mail Group.
-
BELIAL
- Posts: 6758
- Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
- Gender: Female
- Location: Nowhere
Influential shareholder advisory groups oppose Royal Mail boss's pay packet
Snouts in the trough. And the mafia rolls on while the workforce lose their pensions etc. Job in progress, how low will you go?
Bye