heapsy wrote: ↑23 Jul 2024, 19:36
Just wondering, is there any point in paying into the AVCs for the new pension? I don't intend to go beyond 60. 3 years away, and I don't intend to take my pensions early. So is it worth paying AVCs for less than 3 years, if they then end up being taxed?
It looks likely the lump sum including the booster will provide the majority of the 25% tax free amount when taking the RMCPP pension. Therefore I assume any AVC's that take you over 25% would be paid as a UFPLS, as they are at the moment.
Assuming a basic rate taxpayer and using just the contributions paid and no investment growth:
When you access the money either as a UFPLS or after transferring, £25 of each £100 will be tax free, with the remaining £75 being taxed at 20%, which is £15. So you'll still see £85 in your pocket, but that will have only cost you £72 net, when factoring in tax relief and PSE.
Even if you max out your AVC payments(within PSE), the amounts of money involved aren't going to be massive, but that increase from £72 to £85 still represents an 18% increase on your cash - not bad for a 2-3 year investment!
You then have the choice to take the easy profit or leave it invested and hope returns provide a bigger pot.
Hyrrokkin wrote: ↑23 Jul 2024, 21:40
Pondering the same question - although i have more time to serve !
I have a SIPP - thinking of increasing contributions to that after the current AVC's finish in October.
You might still have the same tax implications via your SIPP, depending on other income at the time. But as you won't be benefiting from PSE, each contribution will have cost you more. It might only be 8p in the pound, but that will mount up over time.
There's also the option to transfer AVC's out, which might be more flexible and tax efficient for some.