ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Royal Mail needs to cost-cut to deliver growth

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72733
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Royal Mail needs to cost-cut to deliver growth

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.scotsman.com/business/royal- ... -1-3780258" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

CUT-THROAT price wars in the parcel delivery market are set to make Royal Mail focus even harder on cost-trimming to underpin future earnings, its boss stressed yesterday.

Moya Greene, Royal Mail’s chief executive, said the group’s competitors, including DPD, Yodel and Hermes, had all added capacity despite the collapse of City Link last Christmas and Whistl’s recent decision to quit doorstep deliveries in three UK cities.

The group cut operating costs by 1 per cent in the year to end-March 2015, including a reduction of 5,500 workers from the UK payroll. Profit margins at Royal Mail lifted 40 basis points to 7.9 per cent, driven by tight cost control.

Greene, unveiling an underlying operating profit before restructuring costs up 6 per cent at £740 million, said: “Our trading environment remains challenging, but we are now poised to step up the pace of change to drive efficiency… while maintaining a tight focus on costs.”

Royal Mail said its management reorganisation programme delivered cost benefits of £42m, and it was expected to deliver savings of £80m a year from 2015-16.

Greene said that it had been a tough year and highlighted the threat posed by the roll-out of Amazon’s delivery network, which is expected to have an impact on Royal Mail’s targets for parcel delivery growth.

The chief executive said: “The parcels and letters markets in the UK remain highly competitive.”

Royal Mail’s UK business saw flat revenues at £7.76 billion, with underlying profits up 1 per cent to £615m.

The group said parcel volumes were up 3 per cent, with a better performance in the second trading half, while addressed letters were down 4 per cent.

Richard Hunter, head of equities at Hargreaves Lansdown Stockbrokers, said: “Royal Mail has posted numbers which indicate measured progress in a treacherous environment.

“Whilst the exit of both City Link and Whistl may have removed some of the competition, it also serves to underline how tough this sector can be.

“Meanwhile, the competitive threat of Amazon looms large, with Royal Mail recognising that there will be an impact to its business.”

City analysts estimate Royal Mail’s share of the UK parcels market is 39 per cent, compared with TNT on 8.6 per cent, DPD on 7.2 per cent, Yodel on 6.5 per cent and Hermes on 6.1 per cent.

Revenues at Royal Mail’s GLS business, operating in Europe and the Republic of Ireland, grew 7 per cent to £1.65bn, with underlying profits up 6 per cent to £115m.

Greene said eligible full-time employees who had received an allocation of 729 free shares in the privatisation of the former state-owned group in 2013 were in line to have received £250 in dividend payments by the end of July.

Dave Ward, general secretary-elect of the Communication Workers Union, said: “These results have been delivered by improving productivity and the hard work of postal workers. Those workers have shown they have supported the need to change to build growth in the business.

“However, we also recognise the note of caution that there remains a structural decline in the letters market of 4 per cent. Therefore, the union again calls on the regulator Ofcom to recognise this clear fact and to stop blindly increasing the competition in the sector.”

Greene said trading in the current financial year was in line with expectations, but overall performance would hinge on the key Christmas period.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
teesdale
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 430
Joined: 24 Nov 2007, 16:31

Re: Royal Mail needs to cost-cut to deliver growth

Post by teesdale »

£42 million increasing to £80 million per year after getting rid of the excess managers who used to plague our floors. Very good the Scotsman for getting excellent facts. Weaselly c***s now do the same job at Bristol Mail Centre for £160 less per week than the numpties that went extinct.
5plusbonusball
Posts: 1136
Joined: 12 Jan 2012, 20:50
Gender: Male
Location: up north of watford

Re: Royal Mail needs to cost-cut to deliver growth

Post by 5plusbonusball »

BIG savings to be made by culling dims doms and linos , only need a couple of coaches on the floor between 6 and 10 , no need for all these sat on their pcs all day.
Always said it. Moya , come and see exactly what they do all day , besides printing and laminating and colouring in , i'm buggered if I know! :Very Happy
Why are lino's paid full-time ??
GT750rider
MAIL CENTRES/PROCESSING
Posts: 216
Joined: 25 Nov 2011, 16:57
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail needs to cost-cut to deliver growth

Post by GT750rider »

Dave Ward, general secretary-elect of the Communication Workers Union, said: “These results have been delivered by improving productivity and the hard work of postal workers. [u]Those workers have shown they have supported the need to change to build growth in the business.
[/u]

Supported ? No, bullied into it more like.....
Fatboyslim
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 117
Joined: 30 May 2010, 10:27
Gender: Male

Re: Royal Mail needs to cost-cut to deliver growth

Post by Fatboyslim »

I cannot see it personally. I have been in this job long enough - to see waste on an industrial scale.

I always remember when I had my initial training. There was a 'manager' walking about. Nobody knew what his job title/what he actually did. When he went on leave - nobody covered his 'job'. Do you know what? It's still going on today. Time and time again you see failed managers stumbling from one project to another. This company must be haemorraging millions keeping them all in employment. While they turn the screw on OPG's even further. I have never known a company they needs so many projects completing. Go down to your local MC. It's rife.

And when it's challenged. All you hear - it's a separate budget.