ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Any Outputs from This?/Hayes speech:24/9/07

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
freespeech
MDEC
Posts: 762
Joined: 28 Jun 2007, 16:35

Any Outputs from This?/Hayes speech:24/9/07

Post by freespeech »

News
24 September 2007
DEFENDING POSTAL SERVICES

Fringe Meeting

Monday 24th September 6 – 8pm

Forestdale Suite, Wessex Hotel, West Cliff Road

Chair: Jane Loftus, CWU President

Speakers: Billy Hayes, CWU General Secretary
Dave Ward, CWU Deputy General Secretary
Sadiq Kahn MP
Michael Connarty MP

Discussion around the current postal dispute within Royal Mail. There will be the opportunity to ask questions on the forthcoming industrial action.
User avatar
POSTMAN
SITE ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 32724
Joined: 07 Aug 2006, 03:19
Gender: Male

Post by POSTMAN »

From his Blog.

GENERAL SECRETARY’S SPEECH FOR THE CWU FRINGE MEETING

FORESTDALE ROOM, WESSES HOTEL
WEST CLIFF ROAD, BOURNEMOUTH

In 2004 Allan Leighton floated the proposal to distribute 51% of the shares in Royal Mail.

His proposal to privatise Royal Mail was opposed by the CWU.

________________________

We had a serious campaign around our “Serving Qualityâ€
I Wrote-During Covid-Which is still relevant now
It's good to get these types of threads, the ridiculous my manager said bollox, so we can reassure ourselves that while the world is falling apart, Royal Mail managers are still being the low-life C***S they have always been.
My BFF Clash
The daily grind of having to argue your case with an intellectual pigmy of a line manager is physically and emotionally draining.
genesis
Posts: 220
Joined: 29 May 2007, 21:04

Post by genesis »

There is a good article by billy hayes on socialist review magazine
Go to socialist worker paper. Click on socialist party ,click on socialist review
september issue and its there.
Edward Hunter
Posts: 678
Joined: 23 May 2007, 22:30

Post by Edward Hunter »

Interesting stuff postman. Thanks for posting that.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Post by dvbuk55 »

It is a pity it was at a fringe meeting.

It is a pity he wasn't on National TV - but then he isn't a charismatic leader - what do the public see when he appears on TV?
The next time we elect someone we should ensure he is a Blair like figure - like him or loath him, he held sway at public meetings, he had the common touch. I always likened him to Bill Clinton - who, although he was a bit of a lad, was much loved by the American people.
norbet colon
Posts: 914
Joined: 29 May 2007, 19:56
Location: elsewhere

Clintstone

Post by norbet colon »

dvbuk55 wrote:It is a pity it was at a fringe meeting.

It is a pity he wasn't on National TV - but then he isn't a charismatic leader - what do the public see when he appears on TV?
The next time we elect someone we should ensure he is a Blair like figure - like him or loath him, he held sway at public meetings, he had the common touch. I always likened him to Bill Clinton - who, although he was a bit of a lad, was much loved by the American people.
Clinton was basically a c**t , there's a lot of very nasty things that happened , did the same things as Bush but apparently he had a electric presence & the yanks wern't bothered about Monica , his wacky baccy ;as long as the country appeared to be run well. There was a arrangement with him & Hilary , she was prepared to turn a blind eye so she could get ahead.
dvbuk55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 16650
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:17
Gender: Male

Re: Clintstone

Post by dvbuk55 »

norbet colon wrote:
dvbuk55 wrote:It is a pity it was at a fringe meeting.

It is a pity he wasn't on National TV - but then he isn't a charismatic leader - what do the public see when he appears on TV?
The next time we elect someone we should ensure he is a Blair like figure - like him or loath him, he held sway at public meetings, he had the common touch. I always likened him to Bill Clinton - who, although he was a bit of a lad, was much loved by the American people.
Clinton was basically a c**t , there's a lot of very nasty things that happened , did the same things as Bush but apparently he had a electric presence & the yanks wern't bothered about Monica , his wacky baccy ;as long as the country appeared to be run well. There was a arrangement with him & Hilary , she was prepared to turn a blind eye so she could get ahead.
Hilary was and still is an ambitious and clever woman. Monica was a working class strumpet. Clinton was a charismatic leader and so was Blair, that's not to say everything they did was right BUT put them in front of an audience and they worked them. Image is all in this media led society. I would prefer the image of the CWU to be associated more with Rocky than Billy Bunter.