An excellent post at Lenin's Tomb, on Channel 4's recent, dreadful commentary on the Royal Mail, and on the response of the pseudonymous postal worker Roy Mayall to the progamme. As Lenin points out, Mayall's book Dear Granny Smith is a wonderful read. It's a great companion piece to Capitalist Realism, in fact, and anyone who has enjoyed Capitalist Realism's account of the immiseration of public service labour will get a lot from Dear Granny Smith .
Read more here: http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/011491.html
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Modernisation, not neoliberalisation
-
Roy Mayall
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 16:46
- Gender: Male
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Modernisation, not neoliberalisation
Good article, and I think that the message about what "modernisation" really means, will hit home hard when the majority of the British public become aware that the £400-500million that has been wasted on the latest technology, which will further reduce the manual workforce, will mean even later deliveries of mail than the public currently suffer.
I've never fallen for the "modernisation" clap-trap, I just wish the same could be said for the CWU. A more robust antagonism in the face of Royal Mail's idiotic plans since the comedic 2007 business plan was announced, would, I suggest, have been the order of the day.
I've never fallen for the "modernisation" clap-trap, I just wish the same could be said for the CWU. A more robust antagonism in the face of Royal Mail's idiotic plans since the comedic 2007 business plan was announced, would, I suggest, have been the order of the day.
-
Roy Mayall
- Posts: 236
- Joined: 10 Oct 2009, 16:46
- Gender: Male
Re: Modernisation, not neoliberalisation
Been reading the work of Dr Michael Hudson which I would recommend. http://www.michael-hudson.com/ It's mainly based in America, but it applies here too. He's suggesting that the current economic model is a return to a new economic feudalism. That makes us the new serfs. It certainly feels like that at times.
-
Yahoorsur
- Posts: 512
- Joined: 02 Jul 2007, 08:52
- Gender: Male
- Location: Dunfermline
Re: Modernisation, not neoliberalisation
Roy Mayall wrote:Been reading the work of Dr Michael Hudson which I would recommend. http://www.michael-hudson.com/ It's mainly based in America, but it applies here too. He's suggesting that the current economic model is a return to a new economic feudalism. That makes us the new serfs. It certainly feels like that at times.
Thats the guy who was quoted in the guardian message boards,re your Dispatches reply,at the moment im reading Deepening Debt Crisis: The Road to Debt Peonage ,got to admit,loads of big words and terms that i dont understand but one quote from him sticks out like the sore thumb,it's for everyone who has ever got an email from Nigeria or elsewhere
'The one sure mark of a con, though, is the promise of free money'.
Hope all posties remember this in the coming weeks
The more you know, the worse it gets.
-
borders
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: 11 Sep 2007, 09:10
Re: Modernisation, not neoliberalisation
very good article on K-Punk, especially like this part ----Roy Mayall wrote:An excellent post at Lenin's Tomb, on Channel 4's recent, dreadful commentary on the Royal Mail, and on the response of the pseudonymous postal worker Roy Mayall to the progamme. As Lenin points out, Mayall's book Dear Granny Smith is a wonderful read. It's a great companion piece to Capitalist Realism, in fact, and anyone who has enjoyed Capitalist Realism's account of the immiseration of public service labour will get a lot from Dear Granny Smith .
Read more here: http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/011491.html
"There was an implicit class distinction here: the experts were allowed to speak for themselves and to offer an "overview", whereas the postal workers were like anthropological specimens, trapped unawares by the camera, and not given a chance to explain their actions or what had motivated them. (Why weren't Hooper, Pirie, and DeCarteret filmed secretly in their offices? Seeing them planning the running down and carve-up of the Royal Mail with Mandelson - that's the kind of undercover camera show I'd like to see ...) Well, shock horror, the casual workers had a casual attitude to work; told by their bosses that "Granny Smith [i.e. public service] doesn't matter any more", they act with a contempt towards the concept of public service" ...
"why should it just be the bankers, politicians and the idle rich who get all the best things ? we demand a standard of living for our members that enables them to share in the fine wines and times that the likes of Cameron and his Eton buddies take for granted " - the late great Bob Crow RIP.
-
norbert
- Posts: 3027
- Joined: 15 Jan 2008, 01:46
Re: Modernisation, not neoliberalisation
and it's exactly what our " masters " in Brussels want , turning the clock back 200 + yearsRoy Mayall wrote:Been reading the work of Dr Michael Hudson which I would recommend. http://www.michael-hudson.com/ It's mainly based in America, but it applies here too. He's suggesting that the current economic model is a return to a new economic feudalism. That makes us the new serfs. It certainly feels like that at times.