http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/676a334c-b78f ... ab49a.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
hopefully the link above takes you to the ft story, well if it does , my question is, If we are so defunct/so out of date/living in the past/of little use in this day and age/snail mail/luddites/more opportunities to use alternative methods, why are so many complaining about the action that has taken place and any possible future action?
Also do we need public support?
just a couple to get you going.
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Royal Mail's rivals in demand before strike
-
bogstandard
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16
Royal Mail's rivals in demand before strike
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
-
bogstandard
- Posts: 1074
- Joined: 08 Nov 2007, 06:16
Re: Are we so defunct?
checked the link it does hoorah,
a future in IT awaits me.
a future in IT awaits me.
Confused... You won't be, after the next episode of. SOAP
-
DirtyHarry
- Posts: 5051
- Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
- Gender: Male
- Location: London
Re: Are we so defunct?
We were supposed to be defunct after the 2003 strikes, then again after the 2007 strikes. Rags like the FT will still trot out the same tired old nonsense when I'm long pushing up daisies.
No, I don't believe that having the support of one of the most self-centred, selfish, societies in the western world, is of any importance to our struggle.
No, I don't believe that having the support of one of the most self-centred, selfish, societies in the western world, is of any importance to our struggle.