ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Disabled woman challenges Royal Mail over exemption

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72596
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Disabled woman challenges Royal Mail over exemption

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

http://www.ryeandbattleobserver.co.uk/l ... 4067674.jp

A disabled Hastings woman is seeking a judicial review of plans to axe her local post office, claiming the proposals discriminate against her.
In the High Court, Judy Brown will challenge plans to exempt the Royal Mail from laws requiring public bodies to promote equality for the disabled.

Her husband, Jonathan Coe, said it was an "outrage" that the service had been cut from the list of
tens of thousands of public bodies subject to the rules.

Business Secretary John Hutton - now overseeing the highly-controversial closure programme of 2,500 post offices - exempted Royal Mail from the Disability Equality Duty (DED) in 2006.

Around 45,000 public bodies are covered by the DED which is meant to ensure they pay 'due regard' to the promotion of equality for disabled people in every area of their work.

A spokesman for the Department for Work and Pensions said: "The Royal Mail group is still legally required to ensure that all its services are accessible to all disabled people and that it does not discriminate against disabled people in any aspects of its work, in line with the Disability Discrimination Act.

"There is nothing whatsoever in this case that reduces those obligations.

"This particular case rests on specific technical legal arguments about whether certain aspects of the Disability Equality Duty - a legal duty to actively promote equality of opportunity for disabled people - apply to the Royal Mail Group.

"We believe we have applied the law correctly."

Speaking about Mrs Brown's case, he added: "The Administrative Court Judge found no arguable case against the Department for Work and Pensions. However, the claimant's request for an oral hearing of her application for permission will take place on May 12 and we will await the outcome of this."
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.
BELIAL
Posts: 6758
Joined: 15 Jun 2007, 17:33
Gender: Female
Location: Nowhere

Post by BELIAL »

Don't get sick, don't get disabled.you're just an expensive waste of space,and we ain't gona carry you.On the plus side ,genetic testing might be able to identify you at birth: we could deal with all those showing a propensity to underperformance at an in vitro stage, think of the profit implications
TrueBlueTerrier
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR
Posts: 72596
Joined: 30 Dec 2006, 10:29
Gender: Male
Location: On my couch

Post by TrueBlueTerrier »

BELIAL wrote:Don't get sick, don't get disabled.you're just an expensive waste of space,and we ain't gona carry you.On the plus side ,genetic testing might be able to identify you at birth: we could deal with all those showing a propensity to underperformance at an in vitro stage, think of the profit implications
Ahh - Adam or Allan has decided to join us I see.
All post by me in Green are Admin Posts.
Any post in any other colour is my own responsibility.
If you like a news story I posted please click the link to show support Any news stories you can't post - PM me with a link
My sharing of news articles should not be interpreted as an endorsement or condemnation of any particular viewpoint or the issues presented. I share them solely for informational purposes.