ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Ofcom - Reforming the postal service so it delivers what people need

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
Playmail
Posts: 221
Joined: 24 Oct 2023, 13:21
Gender: Male

Ofcom - Reforming the postal service so it delivers what people need

Post by Playmail »

https://www.ofcom.org.uk/post/royal-mai ... eople-need

  • Ofcom sets Royal Mail new backstop delivery targets to protect people from long delays
  • Changes made to Second Class letter deliveries to protect the universal service
  • Ofcom to review affordability of post amid concerns over stamp prices
UK postal users will have extra protections against long delivery delays, under reforms to the universal service announced today by Ofcom, which will enable Royal Mail to improve reliability and support a sustainable service.

Why reform is needed
Since 2011, Royal Mail has been required under the universal service obligation to deliver First and Second Class letters six days a week. But in that time, the number of letters sent each year has more than halved. With fewer letters being delivered to each house on a given round, the cost of delivering each letter has increased, and Royal Mail has lost hundreds of millions of pounds in recent years.[1]

Urgent reform is needed for the universal service to survive. To put the service on a more sustainable footing, to prevent people from paying higher prices than necessary, and to push Royal Mail to improve reliability, Ofcom has today made changes to the obligations imposed on the company.

This follows public consultation with thousands of people and organisations – including consumer groups, unions, small businesses, public services, Royal Mail and the wider postal industry, as well as postal users directly – from right across the UK.

We have also launched a review of pricing and affordability, which will consider concerns that many people and organisations have raised about stamp prices. We plan to consult on this next year.

Natalie Black, Ofcom’s Group Director for Networks and Communications, said: “These changes are in the best interests of consumers and businesses, as urgent reform of the postal service is necessary to give it the best chance of survival.

“But changing Royal Mail’s obligations alone won’t guarantee a better service – the company now has to play its part and implement this effectively. We’ll be making sure Royal Mail is clear with its customers about what’s happening, and passes the benefits of these changes on to them.

“As part of this process, we’ve been listening to concerns about increases in stamp prices. So we’ve launched a review of affordability and plan to publicly consult on this next year.”

What reform will deliver
Our research suggests that affordability and reliability are more important to people than speed of delivery, but they value having a next-day service available for when they need to send the occasional urgent item. Royal Mail will therefore continue to be required to deliver First Class letters the next working day, Monday to Saturday, and there will continue to be a cap on the price of a Second Class stamp.

However, people have told us that most letters are not urgent, and they do not need six days a week delivery for the majority of letters. So, from 28 July, we will allow Royal Mail to deliver Second Class letters on alternate weekdays – still within three working days of collection – Monday to Friday.[2]

We estimate Royal Mail could realise annual net cost savings of between £250m and £425m with successful implementation of this change, enabling it to invest more in improving its delivery performance. We have told Royal Mail to hold regular meetings with consumer bodies and industry groups to hear about the experiences of people and businesses as it implements these changes.[3]

Our research also shows that small reductions in Royal Mail’s delivery targets would continue to meet people’s needs. Maintaining the current targets – which are more stretching than comparable European countries – would carry higher costs which would need to be recovered through higher prices.

So, we are making small changes to Royal Mail’s existing delivery targets – for First Class mail from 93% to 90% delivered next-day, and for Second Class mail from 98.5% to 95% delivered within three days. These new targets are high by international standards.[4]

However, many people have experienced long delays where letters have taken weeks to arrive. To address this issue, we have set Royal Mail new enforceable backstop targets so that 99% of mail has to be delivered no more than two days late.
Playmail
Posts: 221
Joined: 24 Oct 2023, 13:21
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by Playmail »

Looks like ofcom have agreed 3 day uso
TopperGas
Posts: 3460
Joined: 13 Feb 2021, 22:46
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by TopperGas »

It seems that OFCOM have totally ignored the fact the trials/pilots are hopelessly failing, a good response from the CWU but you sense they are just being totally ignored:

OFCOM ANNOUNCEMENT ON ROYAL MAIL USO: UNION RESPONSE

Responding to today’s announcement that OFCOM have indicated support for a change to the USO obligation for Royal Mail, CWU General Secretary Dave Ward said: “The CWU recognises that Royal Mail now operates in a permanently changed world of communications and accepts the need for change to the specification of the Universal Service Obligation (USO).

“The sustainability of the USO is our utmost priority, and we have long called for reforms that benefit both customers and postal workers in order to enable investment in new growth areas and secure the long-term future of Royal Mail.

‘However, Royal Mail has been trialling these changes in delivery offices across the country and there are clear problems on the ground.

‘These changes are not a ‘one-stop solution’ for the problems in the postal service - the real culprit behind these issues is Royal Mail’s inability to properly recruit and retain staff, which has led to workloads piling up in delivery offices and vital letters being left behind.

‘The new owners of Royal Mail must ensure that the culture of mismanagement and inferior pay and conditions for new staff does not continue under their leadership.

“The CWU has reached an agreement with the new owners that guarantees no compulsory redundancies and the levelling up of new entrant’s terms and conditions as a result of this change.

“In addition, we need to see the government intervene with Ofcom, who have failed in their duty as a regulator, and ensure that there is a level-playing field when it comes to regulating parcel courier giants like Amazon.

“It is in the interest of customers and postal workers that these changes are implemented in the right way, and the CWU will be at the heart of this.

“We will continue working with both the new owners of Royal Mail and the government to ensure that we are all able to benefit from a reliable, more innovative and sustainable postal service for generations to come.”
qwerty2
Posts: 2077
Joined: 30 Jun 2009, 00:42
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by qwerty2 »

Playmail wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 07:27
Looks like ofcom have agreed 3 day uso
Only 2nd class!!!
Gary55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jun 2021, 21:02
Gender: Male
Location: london

Re: Ofcom

Post by Gary55 »

Royal Mail is only second class!
Chelseablue
Posts: 2212
Joined: 19 Aug 2013, 14:33
Gender: Female

Re: Ofcom

Post by Chelseablue »

OFCOM not fit for purpose
Gary55
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 349
Joined: 29 Jun 2021, 21:02
Gender: Male
Location: london

Re: Ofcom

Post by Gary55 »

Pissofcom
dazzler123
Posts: 479
Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by dazzler123 »

Chelseablue wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 09:38
OFCOM not fit for purpose
That was clear when they stated no evidence of proritising parcels over mail
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3211
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by Acca Dacca »

dazzler123 wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 15:39
Chelseablue wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 09:38
OFCOM not fit for purpose
That was clear when they stated no evidence of proritising parcels over mail
True on a technicality though

A tracked letter takes priority over a non tracked parcel
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
dazzler123
Posts: 479
Joined: 11 Oct 2021, 17:36
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by dazzler123 »

Acca Dacca wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 15:47
dazzler123 wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 15:39
Chelseablue wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 09:38
OFCOM not fit for purpose
That was clear when they stated no evidence of proritising parcels over mail
True on a technicality though

A tracked letter takes priority over a non tracked parcel
No its not true when frames nationwide are bursting with mail that should be delivered whilst parcels are clear
Acca Dacca
Posts: 3211
Joined: 16 Aug 2009, 17:13
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom

Post by Acca Dacca »

dazzler123 wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 15:55
Acca Dacca wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 15:47
dazzler123 wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 15:39
Chelseablue wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 09:38
OFCOM not fit for purpose
That was clear when they stated no evidence of proritising parcels over mail
True on a technicality though

A tracked letter takes priority over a non tracked parcel
No its not true when frames nationwide are bursting with mail that should be delivered whilst parcels are clear
Tracked parcels take priority over non tracked parcels though

For as long as a tracked letter gets prioritised over a non tracked 2d parcel they can say that parcels arent prioritised

Its sneaky but its true

Thats why the argument should have been rephrased to 'tracked items are being prioritised over non tracked letters' rather than give them the out by saying just ''parcels''
If you tolerate this, then your paid break will be next
Mr Rush
Posts: 3297
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 14:27
Gender: Male

Re: Ofcom - Reforming the postal service so it delivers what people need

Post by Mr Rush »

TopperGas wrote:
10 Jul 2025, 07:46
“The CWU recognises that Royal Mail now operates in a permanently changed world of communications and accepts the need for change to the specification of the Universal Service Obligation (USO).”
Why didn't the union agitate for dropping Saturdays years ago when it would have made a difference? Is it because that would have meant a one-sixth drop in membership but as 20,000 chucked it after the strikes and the service is permanently understaffed it now makes no difference to their coffers?
The machine stops.