BT paid everybody up to change the culture . For some reason Johnson wasn't popular .madelin4 wrote:Would it not be easier for R Mail to offer all its perm 40 hour people redundancy and then that would be it sorted? i would assume that the queue would be long so then they just take it down the ones with most years get it first? or would it be cheaper to go the other way as in less years first?norbet colon wrote:The orders from on High is "It will & it must be 60/40% " so it's obvious RM want the Dutch model. It's treat 'em mean , keep 'em keen with TC's/AG's, the old Royal Fail model and divide & rule . :cfo :lfo. Been there with another big Union in a now botched privatized industry. Discipline on any little thing to avoid paying out or paying traveling time under Redundancy Resettlement Allowance .I sympathise, it's not nice .madelin4 wrote:This is why they want rid of us perm 40 hour people, we are now a thing of the past!! its not right that we are under constant pressure and worry about our jobs.fedup postie wrote:and they say that flexability does not mean not knowing where you are from one day to the next!
Leighton made a queue to Wembley Stadium quip about Redundancy in that first appalling "letter" to staff. Royal Fail got their fingers burnt paying off paying up their more top heavy than Jordan , a unheard of 15 layers of Management , the hangover from jobs for the boys in the 90's . Royal Fail wouldn't be able to massage the figures and cite so called "miraculous "turnarounds .
I think RM want rid of FT staff by stealth to quote a Hell-fail propaganda plant -"I really "feel" for senior staff as the job will change out of all recognition ".