ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

BREAKING NEWS

Latest Royal Mail and CWU news.This is an open forum.
PrestwickPostie
Posts: 208
Joined: 29 Sep 2007, 12:33

Post by PrestwickPostie »

CWU announced the strike dates last monday ... so in theory they never gave Royal Mail the full 7 days notice .... another blunder by Billy Hayes :lfo :cfo
Adam Crozier is Peter Mandelson's rent boy
doorstep it
Posts: 80
Joined: 20 Sep 2007, 18:29
Location: HA4

Post by doorstep it »

does that mean Tues delivery strikes are still on ?
DIGNITY. UNITY. STRENGTH.
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

Post by lovejoy »

Macca wrote:
madelin4 wrote:so it all mite be called off!!!! then we wud have to re-ballot members? :mad
Would there have to be another ballot??? :shock:


:cfo :lfo
No even if and thats a big if there is a problem with the issuing of the notice the union would simply have to name more dates. Wouldn't be very professional though would it!!!
arsenalbob
EX ROYAL MAIL
Posts: 338
Joined: 17 Jun 2007, 15:34

Post by arsenalbob »

you can picture the scene right now at the tuc. crozier with his mobile glued to his ear waiting for the high court answer. if he gets his injunction he will produce his piece of paper with all the strings again
meweavy
Posts: 473
Joined: 10 May 2007, 11:07

Post by meweavy »

arsenalbob wrote:you can picture the scene right now at the tuc. crozier with his mobile glued to his ear waiting for the high court answer. if he gets his injunction he will produce his piece of paper with all the strings again
if he gets his way,does that mean we wouldnt even be able to go on strike by law?he could just get the high court to pass law over any strike action..
dogfood
Posts: 388
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 19:16

Post by dogfood »

If the 7 days notice has not been served surely this would only effect Mondays action which could be withdrawn and recommenced on the following Monday.

As posted earlier desperate measures by desperate men who have no way of saving face.

As I have always said the indefensible is just that and as long as we all hold out this will eventually become apparent to the two tw*ts.

Typical bully boy tactics when someone stand up to bully, the bully runs of crying to his daddy. In this case some doddering old c*nt with a wig.
robd
Posts: 510
Joined: 31 Jan 2007, 12:03
Gender: Male
Location: Yorkshire

Post by robd »

The statutory immunity of trade unions from liability for inducing breach of contract when calling on members to come out on strike or to take other industrial action depends on the union having the support of a ballot. Further, whenever they undertake a ballot concerning proposed industrial action trade unions must give at least seven days notice to the employers of all members entitled to vote, complying with the specific requirements set out in TULRCA 1992 ss.226, 226A and 234A, Failure to comply with these requirements will mean that the unions concerned will forfeit their statutory immunity (see notes at Trade union matters/immunity from civil action in certain cases ). This happened to the Union of Construction Allied Trades and Technicians in a High Court case heard in November 2003 in which Willerby Holiday Homes Ltd won £130,000 damages from UCATT after that union had failed to give the required seven days formal notice of its intention to ballot, did not correctly ballot everyone in the union and did not give the statutory seven days' notice before bringing members out on strike (note in Contract Journal on Willerby Holiday Homes Ltd v UCATT, Dec 2003).

Looks like Crozier could be going after the unions funds.
meweavy
Posts: 473
Joined: 10 May 2007, 11:07

Post by meweavy »

dogfood wrote:If the 7 days notice has not been served surely this would only effect Mondays action which could be withdrawn and recommenced on the following Monday.

As posted earlier desperate measures by desperate men who have no way of saving face.

As I have always said the indefensible is just that and as long as we all hold out this will eventually become apparent to the two tw*ts.

Typical bully boy tactics when someone stand up to bully, the bully runs of crying to his daddy. In this case some doddering old c*nt with a wig.
:Very Happy that last bit was funny.
Spartacus
Posts: 533
Joined: 23 Jun 2007, 16:41
Location: Wales

Post by Spartacus »

Any one still think we will win this dispute playing by the rules?

An all out stoppage is the only way to stop the destruction of our jobs.
Delivery

Resistance is fertile
Navy Bob
Posts: 32
Joined: 10 Oct 2007, 13:03

Post by Navy Bob »

Yes there would have to be another ballot,and the way I see things there will be a very different result this time
terrace
Posts: 154
Joined: 01 Jun 2007, 18:32

Post by terrace »

Leighton obviuosly wants to break the CWU then.Can't get his way so resorts to raiding Union funds.Has shown his true colours at last.I wonder how the talks are going?
Last edited by terrace on 12 Oct 2007, 15:58, edited 1 time in total.
Macca
Posts: 108
Joined: 12 Jul 2007, 17:00

Post by Macca »

lovejoy wrote:
Macca wrote:
madelin4 wrote:so it all mite be called off!!!! then we wud have to re-ballot members? :mad
Would there have to be another ballot??? :shock:


:cfo :lfo
No even if and thats a big if there is a problem with the issuing of the notice the union would simply have to name more dates. Wouldn't be very professional though would it!!!
Phew!!! Thanks for that, and your right, its not very professional :oops: If this is indeed another screw up, then someone at headquarters needs to be sacked or kept out of harms way :sad: , because this has happened before!!! :mad


:cfo :lfo
lovejoy
Posts: 1255
Joined: 30 Apr 2007, 12:59

SMOKESCREEN

Post by lovejoy »

meweavy wrote:
dogfood wrote:If the 7 days notice has not been served surely this would only effect Mondays action which could be withdrawn and recommenced on the following Monday.

As posted earlier desperate measures by desperate men who have no way of saving face.

As I have always said the indefensible is just that and as long as we all hold out this will eventually become apparent to the two tw*ts.

Typical bully boy tactics when someone stand up to bully, the bully runs of crying to his daddy. In this case some doddering old c*nt with a wig.
:Very Happy that last bit was funny.
There is nothing wrong with the notice i hear. Royal Mail are using that to make the union look silly. It is the unofficial stuff that is causing the problems! Royal Mail are saying the issues people have walked for are part of the national dispute therefore it annuls the ballot and they can attack our funds. Lets wait and see!!!
robmacca
Posts: 257
Joined: 29 May 2007, 17:10
Gender: Male
Location: England

Post by robmacca »

Looks like RM are pooing themselves 'cos of the growing back log!

Maybe RM want to stop the new strike dates by claiming we were on strike when the notice was issued.


How much more desperate can they get?
United We Stand
chayoliver
Posts: 243
Joined: 16 Jul 2007, 11:24

Post by chayoliver »

RM have seen the state of all the backlogged mail thats in the system and are panicking because people are posting what they should have posted last weekend now and with next weeks strikes will cause absalutely mayhem and they know it, so this is just an attempt to delay the strike to get on top of the back log. So CWU you know what to do counter their claims and F*CK em :nana :nana
No Surrender