My post office was selling them on Saturday, the ones with the bold 1 like a large letter.Lounge Lizard wrote:Because First Class definitive stamps with a large '1st' in the top left, rather than the usual small '1st' in the lower left, were sold for a limited time after being issued in August 2006 when Pricing In Proportion was introduced.matthewbutler wrote:How do you know it's 5 years old?Lounge Lizard wrote:Reuse any envelope, yes, but cut out an unfranked five year old stamp from another envelope and glue it on, NO.swintonpostie wrote:so in being green and reusing an envelope it has cost her £1.12 , next time buy a pack of envelopes for a pound then you will have some spare for next time ! and theres no point trying to be green when virgin media and dominos pizza are practically decemating the rainforests on there own
ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE
ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!
Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
-
MGB
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 21 Jan 2012, 20:21
- Gender: Male
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
There's still a bold '1st' on all the "1st Large" stamps but not on the ordinary "1st" stamps for under 240 x 165 x 5 mm and less than 100g.matthewbutler wrote:My post office was selling them on Saturday, the ones with the bold 1 like a large letter.Lounge Lizard wrote:Because First Class definitive stamps with a large '1st' in the top left, rather than the usual small '1st' in the lower left, were sold for a limited time after being issued in August 2006 when Pricing In Proportion was introduced.matthewbutler wrote:How do you know it's 5 years old?Lounge Lizard wrote:Reuse any envelope, yes, but cut out an unfranked five year old stamp from another envelope and glue it on, NO.swintonpostie wrote:so in being green and reusing an envelope it has cost her £1.12 , next time buy a pack of envelopes for a pound then you will have some spare for next time ! and theres no point trying to be green when virgin media and dominos pizza are practically decemating the rainforests on there own
-
MGB
- Posts: 106
- Joined: 21 Jan 2012, 20:21
- Gender: Male
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
Yes, this was the normal was 46p now 60p ones. I'll take a photo of them on a sheet in the PO book if you likeLounge Lizard wrote:There's still a bold '1st' on all the "1st Large" stamps but not on the ordinary "1st" stamps for under 240 x 165 x 5 mm and less than 100g.matthewbutler wrote:My post office was selling them on Saturday, the ones with the bold 1 like a large letter.Lounge Lizard wrote:Because First Class definitive stamps with a large '1st' in the top left, rather than the usual small '1st' in the lower left, were sold for a limited time after being issued in August 2006 when Pricing In Proportion was introduced.matthewbutler wrote:How do you know it's 5 years old?Lounge Lizard wrote:Reuse any envelope, yes, but cut out an unfranked five year old stamp from another envelope and glue it on, NO.swintonpostie wrote:so in being green and reusing an envelope it has cost her £1.12 , next time buy a pack of envelopes for a pound then you will have some spare for next time ! and theres no point trying to be green when virgin media and dominos pizza are practically decemating the rainforests on there own
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
Go on then. That's what this forum needs, a few more pictures.matthewbutler wrote:Yes, this was the normal was 46p now 60p ones. I'll take a photo of them on a sheet in the PO book if you likeLounge Lizard wrote:There's still a bold '1st' on all the "1st Large" stamps but not on the ordinary "1st" stamps for under 240 x 165 x 5 mm and less than 100g.matthewbutler wrote:My post office was selling them on Saturday, the ones with the bold 1 like a large letter.Lounge Lizard wrote:Because First Class definitive stamps with a large '1st' in the top left, rather than the usual small '1st' in the lower left, were sold for a limited time after being issued in August 2006 when Pricing In Proportion was introduced.matthewbutler wrote:How do you know it's 5 years old?Lounge Lizard wrote:Reuse any envelope, yes, but cut out an unfranked five year old stamp from another envelope and glue it on, NO.swintonpostie wrote:so in being green and reusing an envelope it has cost her £1.12 , next time buy a pack of envelopes for a pound then you will have some spare for next time ! and theres no point trying to be green when virgin media and dominos pizza are practically decemating the rainforests on there own
-
TeeferTiger
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 13:56
- Gender: Female
- Location: Welsh Wales
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
Current 1st/60p stamps

Current 2nd/50p stamps


Current 2nd/50p stamps

Does this rag smell of chloroform to you?
-
Stormproof
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: 07 Jul 2007, 21:03
- Gender: Female
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
Theres a Jubilee stamp out aswell


So keep on moving, moving, moving your feet
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
Keep on shuf-shuf-shuffling to this ghost dance beat
Just keep on walking down never ending streets
Illegitimi non carborundum
-
TeeferTiger
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 13:56
- Gender: Female
- Location: Welsh Wales
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
Are they ever going to update her face on them? lol
Does this rag smell of chloroform to you?
-
Lounge Lizard
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 9458
- Joined: 06 Aug 2007, 21:54
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
No, because the Queen likes this version, first used in 1967, so much she won't have any other.TeeferTiger wrote:Are they ever going to update her face on them? lol
-
TeeferTiger
- EX ROYAL MAIL
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 13:56
- Gender: Female
- Location: Welsh Wales
Re: Dear Royal Mail, I am not a thief
Well, I like the photo I had on my first driving licence and passport, but they still wanted an updated one after 10 years! Who does she think she is?!Lounge Lizard wrote:No, because the Queen likes this version, first used in 1967, so much she won't have any other.TeeferTiger wrote:Are they ever going to update her face on them? lol
Does this rag smell of chloroform to you?