ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Two weeks into resign - people being moved off duties they signed for

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
postman_jack
Posts: 78
Joined: 06 Mar 2010, 18:26
Gender: Male

Two weeks into resign - people being moved off duties they signed for

Post by postman_jack »

I know that RM managers can put us any job they want but we just had a resign and already people are being moved off the duties they signed for. What is the guidance on this? Or is it just the case of the latest Royal Mail buzz word "OPERATIONAL NEEDS". If thats the case why not get rid of duty holders and just have an office of reserves
rehabron
Posts: 1372
Joined: 01 Jul 2012, 18:43
Gender: Male

Two weeks into resign - people being moved off duties they signed for

Post by rehabron »

postman_jack wrote:I know that RM managers can put us any job they want but we just had a resign and already people are being moved off the duties they signed for. What is the guidance on this? Or is it just the case of the latest Royal Mail buzz word "OPERATIONAL NEEDS". If thats the case why not get rid of duty holders and just have an office of reserves
Seems another case for a disagreement to be lodged and the IR Framework to come into operation
postslippete
Posts: 4194
Joined: 14 Jul 2014, 16:27
Gender: Male

Two weeks into resign - people being moved off duties they signed for

Post by postslippete »

I can understand staff being moved around in the event of staff sickness. For example, 2 drivers who regularly work together - and one of them being moved to accommodate a non-driver. But they should be asked first, rather than just assuming it's acceptable. In our office, the dom moved regular staff holders off their duty just to lapse the delivery - if that's "operational needs" then it's my "operational need" to work to time, including taking a loop or two off my own duty.
On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world.