ANNOUNCEMENT : ALL OF ROYAL MAIL'S EMPLOYMENT POLICIES (AGREEMENTS) AT A GLANCE (Updated 2021)... HERE

ANNOUNCEMENT : PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE NOT ON FACEBOOK AT ALL!

Why I voted YES

Got a question for a CWU Rep? And all CWU related matters.
deadbox
Posts: 357
Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51

Why I voted YES

Post by deadbox »

This is why I voted yes......Whats your excuse ?

Royal mail business plan over the next 5 years :
Take 9 F/T postmen , make the first 2 redundant ,make the next 6 part time, leaving 1 full time job out of 9.
On top of this give the postmen 2.5% (£8) increase,however remove night duty allowance,remove driving allowance, deliver 5 lots of door2door items but only get paid for 3 of them leaving the postie about £20-£30 p/w worse off.
Add in a further £350 Million in savings in the first year.
Add in a £400 - tax local bonus if targets are met.
Add in a £400 - tax national bonus if targets are met.
( but nobody know what the targets are )
Cover 20% of another delivery for FREE if someone is off sick / on holiday.
Less collections from boxes.
Mail to arrive another 2 hours later than now.
Fewer Post Offices for the public to use.
Fund Mr. crozier's £1 Million wage ( one of the highest paid civil servants ).
PENSION : RM took a 15 year cont. holiday but members still paid in every week - leaving a £3.3 Billion black hole (now members have to accept lower benifits / increased cont.)
All this for a basic of £252 take home pay
Thats why I backed industial action
Vulcan
Posts: 87
Joined: 24 May 2007, 13:48

Post by Vulcan »

Well said Deadbox, I concur absolutely. You are a 'Bon Eouf'
Happily Retired.
deadbox
Posts: 357
Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51

Thanks

Post by deadbox »

Thank you VULCAN

But I can confirm that I'mm not "Bon Eouf" , I'mm most definatly hetrosexual
IWW Fellow Worker
Posts: 3644
Joined: 30 May 2007, 14:27
Gender: Male

Post by IWW Fellow Worker »

What a great post.
The Industrial Workers of the World. The union whose members never scab!

"The working class and the employing class have nothing in common."
DirtyHarry
Posts: 5051
Joined: 13 May 2007, 23:16
Gender: Male
Location: London

Re: Why I voted YES

Post by DirtyHarry »

deadbox wrote:This is why I voted yes......Whats your excuse ?

Royal mail business plan over the next 5 years :
Take 9 F/T postmen , make the first 2 redundant ,make the next 6 part time, leaving 1 full time job out of 9.
On top of this give the postmen 2.5% (£8) increase,however remove night duty allowance,remove driving allowance, deliver 5 lots of door2door items but only get paid for 3 of them leaving the postie about £20-£30 p/w worse off.
Add in a further £350 Million in savings in the first year.
Add in a £400 - tax local bonus if targets are met.
Add in a £400 - tax national bonus if targets are met.
( but nobody know what the targets are )
Cover 20% of another delivery for FREE if someone is off sick / on holiday.
Less collections from boxes.
Mail to arrive another 2 hours later than now.
Fewer Post Offices for the public to use.
Fund Mr. crozier's £1 Million wage ( one of the highest paid civil servants ).
PENSION : RM took a 15 year cont. holiday but members still paid in every week - leaving a £3.3 Billion black hole (now members have to accept lower benifits / increased cont.)
All this for a basic of £252 take home pay
Thats why I backed industial action
Picky , 'aint ya ? :Very Happy :wave

Only joking , :dance Great post, well put, mate. :Applause :Applause :Applause
deadbox
Posts: 357
Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51

Feel Free.......

Post by deadbox »

Please feel free to copy this post and put it into the public domane.....If we can get this sort of message over to the public then many of them will support us in our action.......most people dont have a clue as to what RM offer was......they just see "2.5% from RM" and "27% rise from the greedy postmen" in the media.....I try and tell all my customers that RM are giving £8 in one hand and taking £30 in the other.....all that before we've made any NEW savings on top of the efficencys that we've all had to put up with....( 400 hours out of my office recently - 10 less F//T jobs )
ROCKY
Posts: 2801
Joined: 03 Dec 2006, 13:18

Post by ROCKY »

WHY DONT WE TRY GETTING THE LOCAL RAGS ON BOARD E MAIL THIS SIE TO YOUR LOCAL PAPER AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS THEY DONT HAVE THE POLITICAL CONNECTIONS OF THE BIG BOYS BUT THEY CAN BE NEUTRAL AND DRAW THEIR OWN CONCLUSIONS MAYBE GIVE SMALL TIME PRESS THERE OWN GROUPING AFTER ALL WE ARE BIG NEWS NOW
heapsy
Posts: 2930
Joined: 02 Jun 2007, 23:40
Gender: Male
Location: Drinking with Gangsters

Re: Why I voted YES

Post by heapsy »

deadbox wrote:This is why I voted yes......Whats your excuse ?

Royal mail business plan over the next 5 years :
Take 9 F/T postmen , make the first 2 redundant ,make the next 6 part time, leaving 1 full time job out of 9.
On top of this give the postmen 2.5% (£8) increase,however remove night duty allowance,remove driving allowance, deliver 5 lots of door2door items but only get paid for 3 of them leaving the postie about £20-£30 p/w worse off.
Add in a further £350 Million in savings in the first year.
Add in a £400 - tax local bonus if targets are met.
Add in a £400 - tax national bonus if targets are met.
( but nobody know what the targets are )
Cover 20% of another delivery for FREE if someone is off sick / on holiday.
Less collections from boxes.
Mail to arrive another 2 hours later than now.
Fewer Post Offices for the public to use.
Fund Mr. crozier's £1 Million wage ( one of the highest paid civil servants ).
PENSION : RM took a 15 year cont. holiday but members still paid in every week - leaving a £3.3 Billion black hole (now members have to accept lower benifits / increased cont.)
All this for a basic of £252 take home pay
Thats why I backed industial action
Great post mate, brilliant!
cjp
Posts: 110
Joined: 10 Mar 2007, 15:40
Location: burslem

Post by cjp »

Same reason as deadbox except they want a minimum of 400 hours in cut from our office.

Well put by the way :Applause :Applause :Applause :Applause
deadbox
Posts: 357
Joined: 27 May 2007, 11:51

400 hour cut

Post by deadbox »

cjp , we had a 400 hour cut in our office afew month's ago....with the promise of a bonus of " £200 - £300 "......Like suckers most people voted for it......months and months went by...still no bonus......then it came......£66 (minus tax / NI cont. ) came to about £48.

Now they want top make further savings in the office

You know that they say " you can't do enough for a good boss "

Now is just " YOU CAN'T DO ENOUGH " !!!!!!!!
Vulcan
Posts: 87
Joined: 24 May 2007, 13:48

Re: Thanks

Post by Vulcan »

deadbox wrote:Thank you VULCAN

But I can confirm that I'mm not "Bon Eouf" , I'mm most definatly hetrosexual
'Bon Eouf' means 'Good Egg' which is what you are! :coolr
Happily Retired.